AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


Dying in a black hole and the 2029 Asteroid


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 03:07 PM by Dewm0nster


Ten years prior planning eh?
We should have started two weeks ago.
If we're going to get hit- We're going to get hit.
All these "Plans" are just a load of bull.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 05:12 PM by theflashor


well we best hope, because if its on a collision course we are all pritty screwed,. you really think they could divert sumit like that i doubt it very much...

And even if they tryed it, it would be a first and failure would not be an option if you get my drift.

who says it dont get pulled of course by another planet or sumit else due to gravity.. and it hits us first time. They must think thats a possibility but do you think we would hear of it i doubt that....

We just have to wait n see :S

Peace......



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 05:19 PM by theresult


reply to post by theflashor



that is the point.. wait and see.. = we dont know..

Now the being dead in the black hole thing is very stupid..

i have shown what would happen based on our theory of life / understading..

I dont know what will hit us when but im guessing we will and we wont have a clue untill its infact about to hit..

ie DOOMSDAY.. i never worry about that becouse its the same as being alive and dieing.. pointless




   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 05:19 PM by theresult


reply to post by Dewm0nster



and thankyou

for your comments befor




   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 05:25 PM by Revolution-2012


Originally posted by Dewm0nster
Ten years prior planning eh?
We should have started two weeks ago.



Do you even know what the plans entail????


God. You are very uneducated. The physics behind their plan is much more than possible, they are accurate.

For instance.

You're the batter I'm the base ball.

The baseball is going towards you.
Half way towards the batter a marble flying at a high velocity strikes the baseball square in the middle.

The baseball is not going to hit you, because over the next several feet it's going to veer off.

Asteroids have many different ways of being prevented. None of which are like "Armageddon" but they are very scientifically plaused and highly possible with something along the lines of a 80-90% success rate. If we can't stop an asteroid from hitting us by 2020 than we are just being idiots because we have enough hidden technology to probably evaporate a asteroid by now.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 05:53 PM by theflashor


LOL in your theory, u got evidence to back that up?.. Past case example, no thought not its all theory. They have never tryed anything like it before. In other words they DONT KNOW if it would work or not!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 11:03 PM by Dewm0nster




Do you even know what the plans entail????


God. You are very uneducated. The physics behind their plan is much more than possible, they are accurate.

For instance.

You're the batter I'm the base ball.

The baseball is going towards you.
Half way towards the batter a marble flying at a high velocity strikes the baseball square in the middle.

The baseball is not going to hit you, because over the next several feet it's going to veer off.

Asteroids have many different ways of being prevented. None of which are like "Armageddon" but they are very scientifically plaused and highly possible with something along the lines of a 80-90% success rate. If we can't stop an asteroid from hitting us by 2020 than we are just being idiots because we have enough hidden technology to probably evaporate a asteroid by now.





First, the "Hidden technology" line doesn't aid in proving your point. Second, you can't "Evaporate" and asteroid- Maybe you meant a comet. Sometimes "Uneducated" people make mistakes like that.

There are "Theoretical" ways of detering bodies from striking Earth- None of which are currently implemented on a scale that could be considered "Useful".

Unless you have a link? A source to an actual program in existence, designed for this very purpose- In effect today?

If you wanted to change an objects trajectory- You wouldn't strike it head on, either.

And, on a side note, where you wrote "Scientically plaused"- "Plaused" is not a word.

Sincerely,
An uneducated poster.


[edit on 11-1-2009 by Dewm0nster]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 11:09 PM by Jbird


Ok Folks. More On Topic less personal sniping Please



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>

















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.032 seconds
Page processed in 0.045 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.