She probaly got tired of risking her neck for what amounts to securing the oil fields over there for the oil industries over here.
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
Originally posted by mystiq
Originally posted by Cynic
Many here in Canada, including myself, believe she must be returned to face whatever fate she has made for herself. Follow the link below to todays' story in the Globe and Mail, and read the comments attached to it. While unfortunate, the fact that she is female and now has a Canadian born infant is of no consequence IMHO
She must get the boot, now.
www.theglobeandmail.com...
I would offer her sanctuary in my home and charge anyone who showed up with treason because so far, I don't like what they're doing in my country. I don't stand for heartless crap. Wanting to live and be free from militia is not a crime, but is a very important signal that she is growing up, evolving and waking up.

Citing a source defining how aggressive the military should be during war? That's not the argument here. It's how aggressive the US should be. We shouldn't have a standing army in the first place, but there's nothing that says we can't, just that we "ought not" to. How the military wages it's war is determined by laws in place regarding Geneva, Hague, and our laws as well.
The short item I wanted to point out was that, if the Iraq war didn't have a declaration of war from Congress, then the President can not wage said war. Congress only has the power to declare war. If they do not, then waging a war is illegal. Without that declaration from Congress, even if they fund the war, they are illegally providing funds to wage an illegal war, which then can be argued that being sent to an illegal war is not a lawful order, those giving said unlawful orders default on the contract.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by Midav
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution "
That is precisely what she is doing by refusing to fight in an Undeclared War of Aggression (illegal under the Nuremburg Laws, 1949).