Just a quick clarification, in the US military you sign up for 8 years regardless on your initial contract. However many years active and the
remainder inactive reserve. Just semantics I suppose...
Now for my 2 cents...
The way I see it, the contract is just a legal agreement between the individual and the military... you agree to follow lawful orders of those above
you in rank in return for certain benefits.
What most people don't do, is read the fine print of the contract. They tend to listen to the sugar coated stories the recruiters tell them and
stare at the dollar signs waved in front of them...
Now on the first part above, is that you agree to follow lawful orders of those above you.... well as shown in many threads here on ATS, the legality
of the Iraq war is in serious doubt. The conduct of some members of our military over there has been reprehensible. There are accusations of war
crimes floating around. It's even been questioned if we're even "defending" America at all... You can find these topics with a quick search of
ATS...
With that said she can make a case that the US government itself is breaking terms of the contract... I don't think the case would go very far... but
still...
Still further along you take an oath of enlistment... where you swear to protect and defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic...
It can be argued that even then she (and technically all US military) has been forced to break the oath, which then causes the government itself to
be an enemy....
Now.... this is assuming that both wars are wrong and illegal... however if the conspiracies are completely wrong then all this can be disregarded.
I sleep now. possibly edit tomorrow for content.