Originally posted by jerico65
reply to post by Double Eights
How do I figure? Easy, when some troop decides to take the advice of some anti-war protester and deserts, when he gets caught, what happens? He goes
to prison; the protester doesn't.
So it's easy to scream and yell that the troops should just tell their officers they aren't going, but they aren't going to do the time for the
crime.
Like I said, the soldiers have a DUTY to uphold the Constitution. If you don't want to do such, DO NOT ENLIST. Once you sign that line, confirming
your oath to defend and uphold the Constitution, you are required to do such. NOT following said oath is a breach of contract, which is A CRIME.
So, which is it? Follow the unlawful orders and break your oath, or refuse to go and prove that the order is unlawful?
The soldiers also have the tools needed to defend their position that the war is unconstitutional, and thus following the orders to deploy to Iraq
would be unlawful.
You are making the soldiers out to be the victims, when in reality, they are committing a crime in the first place if they go to Iraq.