|
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 02:45 PM by Darthorious
|
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
reply to post by Darthorious
Hey come on now. You do know about PSYOPS , black ops, "mind wars" and the like? This site exposes a hell of a lot of that stuff. Why would any
secret organization divulge any of there ideas and plans to the public? Have they ever?
I think this is a very basic form of mind control at the least, and on another level I see it as a way to police free thinking blogs, especially any
that oppose the agency/ies in question. Moral must be kept high, for if the people inside these organizations knew real public sentiment, well they
probably wouldn't be there to implement such 'flow charts'.
I guess you can now call me paranoid (even though I don't believe I am). I am simply exposing as much as "I" see that doesn't seem right for a
free society, that prides itself on a free way of thinking and living (and i'm not saying you or anyone else here is against this free way of
thinking).
wZn
Ya I know about them, was in the AirForce too long not to know about them and meet people and in fact had a friend tell me about some stuff he himself
was assigned to. It's just when you have two pics of this and one has one number and email and then the second one has completely different
information it lends it self to skepticism.
Plus it looks like it was either heavily edited in some of the boxes as they have quite a bit more pixelation than some of the other ones. Could just
be a compression gone bad too. No way to know.
But considering real contact info. would only give away the agency that made it not who posted it so they would be safe no matter what the contact
info was.
To me looks more like a college type flow chart for an internet class or assignment.
Normally with something like this if it's planed on being printed off in the military and handed out normally they use all black ink with shades of
gray to save money because color prints would become extremely expensive.
And of course the fact there is no AirForce seal on it. Every piece of paperwork I sent or received including class room instruction material we were
required to place an AirForce seal on it. If you didn't the higher ups would get quite upset with you.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 02:47 PM by secretagent woooman
|
The Air Force probably would need a flow chart to explain how to read the flow chart, they sure are hyped up on regimentation!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 02:59 PM by Darthorious
|
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by Darthorious
Actually, the phone number is listed as:
ome > Contact Us ... Air Force Public Affairs Agency Trademark Office 1690 Air Force Pentagon Washington, D.C., 20330-1690 703-696-1158 or DSN
426-1158 ...
It is the general switchboard for the US Air Force Public Affairs Agency
There is two of them the first one has a gmail account with a cell phone listing.
The second has replaced that one with the information you posted above.
Multiple versions of the same document with different contact information is just proof it has been manipulated.
Edit: A little more research and I find this second listing is to the office that answers questions about the AirForce Insignia and what it can or
can't be legally displayed on, and also helps to police anyone using an AirForce insignia for personal gain or advertisement not approved by the
AirForce oh the irony.
The link so you can look and see yourself if you like.
Link
[edit on 8-1-2009 by Darthorious]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 03:01 PM by musselwhite
|

reply to post by greeneyedleo
ha ha ha. "stop it." sure, ok, no problem! ha ha ha. that's a good one. i for one believe it's going on as we speak. there is no
trolling here. you disprove the military is not monitoring threads. btw, how is it you have so much time on your hands. do you sit at a 'puter all
day monitoring what is being said on this board? your always quick, real quick.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:10 PM by jerico65
|
Originally posted by musselwhite
as usual, you are seldom in agreement with anything posted regarding covert military operations.
And just what do you know about anything that has to do with covert military operations? Because if you do, you'd have signed a NDA and wouldn't be
yapping about them on this forum.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:21 PM by jerico65
|
Originally posted by musselwhite
more]ha ha ha. "stop it." sure, ok, no problem! ha ha ha. that's a good one. i for one believe it's going on as we speak. there is no
trolling here. you disprove the military is not monitoring threads. btw, how is it you have so much time on your hands. do you sit at a 'puter all
day monitoring what is being said on this board? your always quick, real quick.
So, she answers quick. Big freakin' deal. She has better spelling and grammar than you do.
And she has to disprove that the military isn't monitoring things? Where's your proof that they are? I honestly think the military has better things
to do. They aren't waiting by a console, staring at the screen, just waiting for musselwhite to post.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:29 PM by KyoZero
|
And of course the fact there is no AirForce seal on it. Every piece of paperwork I sent or received including class room instruction material we were
required to place an AirForce seal on it. If you didn't the higher ups would get quite upset with you.
Well I totally agree it looks like BS but this statement isn't exactly true. I've had plenty of materials that never had the symbol. Official
documents yet but many AF Forms, IMT Forms, classroom materials, and many Power Point things without it. At least it isn't true everywhere in the
AF...
regardless...those charts look...ridiculous
-Kyo
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:41 PM by blupblup
|
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Ah! As usual you resort to snide personal comments about me. I'm telling you now - stop it. You don't know me. You don't know what I know and
believe. I share what I choose to share and do not share all that I know or believe - on any topic.
And if I see something that could be wrong - I deny ignorance by participating in said discussion and providing evidence to support my position. At
least im mature enough to say that if im found to be wrong, I will own up to it.
Do you have anything to add to this thread other then personal attack? Can you prove or disprove the legitimacy of this topic and the image posted?
Please, show us your research and proof, we are waiting for it, as im sure you didnt just stop by to attack me personally
Absolutely brilliant post.
Could not have put that better at all, and really could have used this in the past.
WTG G.E.L.  
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:43 PM by watchZEITGEISTnow
|
reply to post by jerico65
Just want to know if you believe in disinfo agents at all? If so what types of disinfo do you believe has been spread on ATS and by whom? Thanks.
Also I'd like to hear from greeneyedleo about the same question.
Thanks for your responses.
wZn
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:46 PM by thefreepatriot
|
this should be front page
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:47 PM by watchZEITGEISTnow
|
While everyone is patting themselves on the back. I notice the diversion is in process here. So to all those that believe this particular chart to be
bunk, that's fine. However rather than rubbing each others egos ....
how about some constructive input from those people, like the question I just asked Jericho65 and greeneyedleo.
That would be great to know if any of the debunkers of this thread open up on what they think/know about disinformation agents and when this has been
applied? eg. Gulf of Tonkin
big smooches too you all
wZn
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:51 PM by blupblup
|
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
Why are people debunkers because they disagree with you?
I know my questions are a little difficult for you, as you seemed to ignore the last one i asked you TWICE.... but can you answer that?
I think that there may well be, probably are, on some level in some areas of the media, dis-info agents... I'm sure nobody would argue that.
Your ENTIRE premise is that if somebody disagrees with what you say, then they are a disinfo agent?
yet you result to personal digs and skip out of any questions you can't answer... perhaps Doth Thou Protest Too Much?
[edit on 8/1/09 by blupblup]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:55 PM by seagull
|
 
Good afternoon people.
The back and forth personality conflicts stop as of right now.
The issue, and I remind you because certain folks seem to have forgotten,
is: Paid disinfo agents... we have your proof right here!
Let's keep that in mind shall we? Thanks.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:58 PM by blupblup
|
reply to post by seagull
We are not angry, just debating.
There is no proof to discuss
But we are getting to the reasons the OP believes people are dis-info agents.
He is just about to tell us all... there is no malice here, just banter.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 05:07 PM by watchZEITGEISTnow
|
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
I think that there may well be, probably are, on some level in some areas of the media, dis-info agents... I'm sure nobody would argue that.
[edit on 8/1/09 by blupblup]
Thanks for that, now anyone else?
wZn
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 05:16 PM by jerico65
|
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Just want to know if you believe in disinfo agents at all? If so what types of disinfo do you believe has been spread on ATS and by whom? Thanks.
As BlupBlup said, it's probably safe to say that there are disinfo guys out there. Are there here? I don't know. I don't think anyone would know.
But is that original flow chart some sort of "Disinfo blueprint"? I think GEL proved that it wasn't.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 05:18 PM by blupblup
|
Exactly.. the thread wasn't about whether we thought there were or were not agents...
It was your absolute proof there were?
So your questioning is actually off topic.
I thought we were getting somewhere too?
[edit on 8/1/09 by blupblup]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 05:19 PM by watchZEITGEISTnow
|
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Just want to know if you believe in disinfo agents at all? If so what types of disinfo do you believe has been spread on ATS and by whom? Thanks.
As BlupBlup said, it's probably safe to say that there are disinfo guys out there. Are there here? I don't know. I don't think anyone would know.
But is that original flow chart some sort of "Disinfo blueprint"?
Awesome. Now we're getting somewhere. Thank you for your reply too.
wZn
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 05:25 PM by ziggystar60
|
I have always thought that if someone would place a disinfo agent in a forum like this, it would not be a "debunker" or a "skeptic". It would be a
"believer".
Someone who drowned grains of truth in absolutely outrageous and idiotic claims that could very easily be prowen wrong or false. In that way they can
discredit conspiracy theorists in general. You know, like the people wearing tin foil hats. They sure have made ufologists a laughing stock in the
main stream media and in the eyes of the average person...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 05:30 PM by Jay-in-AR
|
I am working under the assumption that this flier is real. I'm not going to banter back and forth on the veracity of the claim. That is just a way to
filter the topic.
The point I was trying to make was that if this thing was real, then yes, certainly the soldiers are being used to disinform people. Why? Because the
average soldier doesn't have a clue as to the bigger picture of anything the military does. I know this. I am a vet myself.
I remember just after 9-11, the government gave us training on how to conduct yourself during a media interview just in case a reporter asked for your
thoughts... We were given strict guidelines on exactly what we could say, or not say. Even came with color print-outs NOT TOO DISSIMILAR from the one
we are now questioning. The military will try to put a friendly face (one like this  ) on anything they do. No matter how grotesque or inhumane it
may be.
There are many reasons why this is so, by the way. And good ones.
I never once said that I thought the military should stop giving guidelines to people posting on the internet. In fact, in a lot of cases, I think it
is a good thing. I would only be concerned if the military had its minions outright lie.
And to the poster above who implies that I called military personnel unwitting fools, that is simply not true. As, by proxi, I would be saying the
same thing of myself.
I met many, many BRILLIANT people in the military... Even we "grunts" aren't as dumb as the rest of the servicemen would have you believe.
My only concern is the overall situation. I have become so far disassociated with the military it isn't even funny. That being said, I will never
speak ill of the troops. Nay, only their handlers.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |