It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Colonel
That's right. Blame Clinton. That's the default answer to anything forthe repugnant.
It seems that some find it to be an impossibility that the truck bomb was able to do that damage.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Ok, so tell me Affermative Reaction, do you really think that Timothy McVey was the lone conspiritor in the bombing in Oklahoma?
It seems that some find it to be an impossibility that the truck bomb was able to do that damage.
In addition, why were other devices taken from the building.
There are a number of incidents in where the US government has allowed attacks for political reasons.
Pearl Harbor for one.
The Maine?
I find it hard to believe that with all the information out there that you could possibly have such steadfast resolve about the issue like you are Bush's duck hunting pal.
Originally posted by Amuk
It seems that some find it to be an impossibility that the truck bomb was able to do that damage.
I know a bit about demolitions and have a problem with this. A lot more than the twin towers, at least they were possible.
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Ok, so tell me Affermative Reaction, do you really think that Timothy McVey was the lone conspiritor in the bombing in Oklahoma?
It seems that some find it to be an impossibility that the truck bomb was able to do that damage.
In addition, why were other devices taken from the building.
There are a number of incidents in where the US government has allowed attacks for political reasons.
Pearl Harbor for one.
The Maine?
I find it hard to believe that with all the information out there that you could possibly have such steadfast resolve about the issue like you are Bush's duck hunting pal.
What the HELL does McVey having co-conspirators have to do with anything??? I guess that's just a beginning little tit to suck on to sway one from the rest of your post.
Other devices taken from the building? Show me one, just ONE, CREDIBLE SOURCE for that preposterous claim. That is so far out there it's almost too ridiculous to comment on.
Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen? Get real. Again, real sources for these idiotic claims, and no, rense.com is FAR from credible.
The problem with "all the information out there" is that you and crack pots like the colonel use farcical, whimsical sites for your "information". the problem is, none of it can be verified. "A reliable source", isn't good enough. Hard cold facts are. Barring that, you just make it up. "The government has been holding pieces of other devices found at the Oklahoma City bombing to cover up Alien involvement." Sorry....I don't buy the bullshiite you are shoveling, and thankfully, people with brains and common sense don't either.
And my "steadfast resolve" about the issue has nothing to do with any like, dislike, or connection with GWB...it has to do with absolutely despising lying gasbags who have nothing better to do than slander what they do not like. It's political dirty pool, plain and simple. The release of Clarks bull#, flip-flopping book is timed for political reasons, to assist his best friend who just happens to work for the DNC. This so called "bi-partisan commission" is bullshiite as well, and is being used by the democrats on the board to pontificate and make speeches when ever they are on live TV. Condi Rice threw it back in their faces, and since she did such a great job, in another thread, Kentucky Fried Colonel has accused her of perjury, making his claims sound like fact. What a crock. Fact is, every one of his statements is bull#....his opinion, stated as fact.
Call me what you will, but whenever I see people spreading crap, I have an overwhelming desire to open the window and let the stink out.
[Edited on 10-4-2004 by Affirmative Reaction]
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
OK, so since you think that people who believe all the information out there is true are lying garbage spreaders, wouldn't you be of the same ilk?
You believe all the conspiracy information is bogus or lies right?
How can that be possible? How can all the information out there be bogus?
Fact is, is that there has to be truth out there somewhere in the middle. I'm not saying I believe everything, but currently am in the middle of investigating a number of events in the past decade or so, and some interesting things have come up.
Anyway, I find it rediculous that you could cast out a wealth of information because some are bad or lies.
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Originally posted by Colonel
No, blame Bush is the answer from your putrid mouth for everything, KFC. Fortunatly, only moronic peckerwoods like yourself actually believe the claptrap you spew all over this board. But hey, let's break it down, buttnuggitt...
Buttnugget? Peckerwood? Look, you need to stop living your "Deliverance" fantasies and get with the topic.
1993 - First attempt to blow up the WTC....who's watch???
Clinton...what did he do???
Nothing....
Lie. Clinton was just in his presidency and what DID he do. He went after the perpetrators, caught them, and served them justice. They're in prison right now. Where are the guys that plotted 9/11?
1995
April 19, Oklahoma City...who's President?
Billy Boy...and he did.....nothing???
Lie. Timothy McVeigh is dead. He got justice. Others are incarcerated
1996
June 25, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, Khobar Towers blown up...a good friend of mine is killed
Who's on duty?
Clinton...what did he do?
Nothing....
I'm not sure. Have tyo research this.
1998
Aug. 7, Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Our embassies are blown to hell...I get to go in and help clean up the mess...
who's the prez?
Clinton
and what's he do? Lob a few missles at nothing....
He was doing his job trying to get the perpetrators but was hampered by you repugnants and your multimillion dollar investigation into fellatio. Every move he made in stopping terrorists was considered "Wagging the Dog" to detract from Monica, so stop LYING.
Oh, you so conveniently ommitted the near catasphrophic 2000 Millineum Attack in NY and in Seattle which he foiled.
2000
Oct. 12, Aden, Yemen USS cole blown up
On the pike, Clinton...does...again...nothing...
Lie. Clinton had a plan of attack for theose that did the Cole and handed it over to the Bush administration ---if you watched the Condi Rice Hearings. THe Bush Admin did...nothing.
2001
Sept. 11, New York City, Arlington, Va., and Shanksville, Pa...Saudi whacko's attack...who's on duty? Bush....what's he do? Kicks the SHIITE out of Afganistan, then goes after THE MOST BRUTAL regime on the earth at the time...what happens???
Suadi whacko attack so why doesn't he go after Saudi Arabia? Why hasn't he caught Osama as Clinton did with the other terrorists mentioned? Why is Bush allowing the Bin Laden's to exit the US before questioning? You automoton.
[Edited on 11-4-2004 by Colonel]
Originally posted by Colonel
Lie. Clinton was just in his presidency and what DID he do. He went after the perpetrators, caught them, and served them justice. They're in prison right now. Where are the guys that plotted 9/11?
Yeah, everybody lies but you, right mealy mouth? You are so full of Shiite, but then, Clinton needs all the apologists he can get. He had EIGHT YEARS to do something�.he did nothing. If he had, none of what is going on right now would have happened.
LIE! Clinton got a blind cleric. Wow, did he have to use a seeing eye dog to get the blind guy? The Pakistani�s got Ramsi Yousef. The guys who plotted 9/11 are either in liquid form ( the hijackers) in custody (Khalid Shaikh Mohammed) or hiding out in the moutain caves of Afganistan eating their donkeys.
Lie. Timothy McVeigh is dead. He got justice. Others are incarcerated
Even I don�t think McVey acted alone. There were MANY more conspirators. And oh, LIE! Only one is incarcerated. Clinton didn�t go after the rest because he was afraid that America would look at him poorly because it was domestic terrorism. He left it at the two, so it would look like a couple of extreamist whackos.
1996
June 25, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, Khobar Towers blown up...a good friend of mine is killed
I'm not sure. Have tyo research this.
Research all you want, bucko�Actually, I�ll tell you what he DID do about this. He fired an Air Force General. Made him a scape goat. That�s the legacy of the clinton era military. His favorite thing to do was to pass the buck, place the blame on an individual, regardless of wether they could have impacted the system, and impale them. Just ask the family of the Airman who commited suicide after he was railroaded after an F-15 crash in Germany. Yeah, Clinton was the king of morale boosters. The reason all he ever did was lob cruise missles is that he didn�t have the confidence of the military. Wow...pass the buck...place the blame...that sounds just like you, Ken-tacky Fried Kernal!
He was doing his job trying to get the perpetrators but was hampered by you repugnants and your multimillion dollar investigation into fellatio. Every move he made in stopping terrorists was considered "Wagging the Dog" to detract from Monica, so stop LYING.
Oh, you so conveniently ommitted the near catasphrophic 2000 Millineum Attack in NY and in Seattle which he foiled.
Doing his job trying to get the perps? WHAT!?? Dude, besides being one of the biggest liars on this bord, you are delusinal. The opposite is true. He made a weak attempt to send a few FBI guys over to try to distract attention AWAY from his domestic problems. He made NO moves to stop terrorism, he did nothing but HAMPER efforts. And don�t tell me I�m lying about this, dinkus, because I WAS THERE! During the Clinton years, so much money and resources was diverted from intelligence gathering efforts, that we lost what the CIA estimates to be over 90% of our HUMINT resources. Billary wanted to go all satalite.
As far as the Millineum attack, Clinton had absolutly NOTHING to do with thwarting that. It was one alert boarder guard doing her job, and quite well I might add, that caught the moron trying to cross into the US from Canada. So�STOP LYING!!!
Lie. Clinton had a plan of attack for theose that did the Cole and handed it over to the Bush administration ---if you watched the Condi Rice Hearings. THe Bush Admin did...nothing.
Sorry, again, you twist and turn, like a hung criminal in the wind. No plan was presented, and I challenge you to prove Dr. Rice ever said any plan about the Cole was presented by Clinton. Bottom line, you continue to, in this and other threads, present your whacko opinions as fact. Nothing to back anything u, but you present them as the truth. Sorry, but as is plainly evidenced, you are the fulli of shiite�try again. And I notice you in no way tried to answer my last point...cant lie your way out of that one, can you...
Originally posted by Colonel
Does it bother any of you how these people just get on this board and LIE?
Originally posted by ReelView
I suggest no one believe anyone else. Just do your own objective research via web searches and research on your own. Lookup �9-11 Hoax�, �9-11 staged�, �9-11 Faked� for the web portion.
I used to be very Hawkish on 9-11. My view was the US should tell every country get rid of terrorists or else. If we are every attacked again then we'll nuke you if we think your involved.
I thought that way cause I ran the numbers:
I figured the return on investment for the "Terrorists" was at least 100,000 to 1. For every dollar they invested (food, lodging, training, travel) they made $100,000 US dollars in profit (so to say). We cannot sustain a war like that folks. We can�t beat those odds.
I know am fully confident that 9-11 was a Hoax, a staged event.
Originally posted by Colonel
DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: I think there are four. One is the fact that standard operating procedures for dealing with possibly hijacked airplanes were not followed on 9/11. Those procedures call for fighter jets to be sent out immediately upon any sign that a plane may have been hijacked. These jets typically get to the plane within no later than 15 minutes anywhere in the United States. And on that day, there were four airplanes that went for a half-hour or more after they were hijacked without jets intercepting them.
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Yeah, everybody lies but you.
No, just repugnants.
LIE! Clinton got a blind cleric. Wow, did he have to use a seeing eye dog to get the blind guy? The Pakistani�s got Ramsi Yousef. The guys who plotted 9/11 are either in liquid form ( the hijackers) in custody (Khalid Shaikh Mohammed) or hiding out in the moutain caves of Afganistan eating their donkeys.
Yeah, he got a blind cleric---the spiritual leader of those terrorists. Just like the Iraelis took o ut that other cleric who was the spiritual leader of Hamas! You're such a moron. Who did Bush get? Did he get anybody? Have the perpetrators been brought to justice?
HAMBURG, Germany (CNN) -- The only suspect convicted in the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States has been released from a German jail, pending a retrial.
www.cnn.com...
WHERE ARE THE REST OF THE SUSPECTS! WHERE'S OSAMA!
Even I don�t think McVey acted alone. There were MANY more conspirators. And oh, LIE! Only one is incarcerated. Clinton didn�t go after the rest because he was afraid that America would look at him poorly because it was domestic terrorism.
I see you and Clinton are buddies being that youknow somuch about him and his reasons for doing #. You are such a backwater fool.
He made a weak attempt to send a few FBI guys over to try to distract attention AWAY from his domestic problems. He made NO moves to stop terrorism, he did nothing but HAMPER efforts.
You see how the repugnant operates. ANY attempt to stop terrorism is a weak attempt if done by Clinton---even if it succeeds. Yet, this president has brought "none to justice" and claims that he's the war president like he's in some damn movie and being the backwater dunce that you are, you fall for it.
And don�t tell me I�m lying about this, dinkus, because I WAS THERE! During the Clinton years, so much money and resources was diverted from intelligence gathering efforts, that we lost what the CIA estimates to be over 90% of our HUMINT resources. Billary wanted to go all satalite. [i/]
Whatever.
As far as the Millineum attack, Clinton had absolutly NOTHING to do with thwarting that. It was one alert boarder guard doing her job, and quite well I might add, that caught the moron trying to cross into the US from Canada. So�STOP LYING!!!
Colonel: That's right, liar. Don't give the president credit when his people stop a MAJOR attack on our soil but blame him when an attack does occur but on someone else's watch---namely a lazy repugnant. So, can you tell jme why Clinton freely gave his documents on his efforts against terrorism to trhe Commission and Bush is trying to hide it---AS HE ALWAYS DOES, "SMART GUY?"
Sorry, again, you twist and turn, like a hung criminal in the wind. No plan was presented, and I challenge you to prove Dr. Rice ever said any plan about the Cole was presented by Clinton.
From Colonel:
KERREY: Well, I think it's an unfortunate figure of speech because I think, especially after the attack on the Cole on the 12th of October, 2000, it would not have been swatting a fly. It would not have been -- we did not need to wait to get a strategic plan.
Dick Clarke had in his memo on the 20th of January overt military operations. He turned that memo around in 24 hours, Dr. Clarke. There were a lot of plans in place in the Clinton administration -- military plans in the Clinton administration.
In fact, since we're in the mood to declassify stuff, there was -- he included in his January 25 memo two appendices -- Appendix A: "Strategy for the elimination of the jihadist threat of al Qaeda," Appendix B: "Political military plan for al Qaeda."
So I just -- why didn't we respond to the Cole?
KERREY: Why didn't we swat that fly?
RICE: I believe that there's a question of whether or not you respond in a tactical sense or whether you respond in a strategic sense; whether or not you decide that you're going to respond to every attack with minimal use of military force and go after every -- on a kind of tit-for-tat basis.
By the way, in that memo, Dick Clarke talks about not doing this tit-for-tat, doing this on the time of our choosing.
I'm aware, Mr. Kerrey, of a speech that you gave at that time that said that perhaps the best thing that we could do to respond to the Cole and to the memories was to do something about the threat of Saddam Hussein.
That's a strategic view...
www.cnn.com...
[Edited on 11-4-2004 by Colonel]
[Edited on 11-4-2004 by Colonel]
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Other devices taken from the building? Show me one, just ONE, CREDIBLE SOURCE for that preposterous claim. That is so far out there it's almost too ridiculous to comment on.
Perhaps a lot of the information out there is crap. I'm not some conspiracy nut who hates Bush. Hell, I even voted for him. But sometimes there is enough information out there to make you question the things you believe. Here is a credible source:
An analysis of raw news footage and reports in the immediate aftermath of the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City, Okla., shows local television reporters stating repeatedly that two additional, sophisticated, undetonated explosive devices were found by investigators on the scene. The television reports raise questions about the official government version of events that an "extremist" and his friend acted alone, using a Ryder rental truck and a 1,200-pound ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, or ANFO, bomb to destroy the face of the building.
More
[Edited on 10-4-2004 by Affirmative Reaction]
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
Other devices taken from the building? Show me one, just ONE, CREDIBLE SOURCE for that preposterous claim. That is so far out there it's almost too ridiculous to comment on.
Perhaps a lot of the information out there is crap. I'm not some conspiracy nut who hates Bush. Hell, I even voted for him. But sometimes there is enough information out there to make you question the things you believe. Here is a credible source:
An analysis of raw news footage and reports in the immediate aftermath of the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City, Okla., shows local television reporters stating repeatedly that two additional, sophisticated, undetonated explosive devices were found by investigators on the scene. The television reports raise questions about the official government version of events that an "extremist" and his friend acted alone, using a Ryder rental truck and a 1,200-pound ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, or ANFO, bomb to destroy the face of the building.
More
[Edited on 10-4-2004 by Affirmative Reaction]
I had planned on having a number or other things to put out to you, but my network is AFU so I will have to do it tomorrow.
I am not trying to prove that all this DID happen, but rather that it is possible and warrents further scrutiny.