AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


A demolition goes wrong. Compare this video with the fall of WTC7




Topic started on 7-1-2009 @ 12:07 PM by g210b


Just found.

Check this video: Demolition Goes Wrong

www.metacafe.com...

That is a controlled demolition that went wrong.

Do you notice how the falling building after the initial blow left to itself slows down to a stand still?

That's what a buildings structure and material does: It eats up the energy which causes a slowing in the collapse speed in this case even to a stand still.

Now question yourself: Why did WTC 7 'self collapse' not even to the slightest look like that?



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more 9/11 Conspiracies topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:24 PM by newagent89


What was the building made out of? Was it a tube within a tube? How long was it burning or was it ever on fire? Why was it demolished? Had it sustained damage prior to falling?

Why didn't it look like WTC7? Because it was not WTC7. You might say that WTC was a successful unplanned demolition but it was not controlled at all.

Besides, that massive vertical gash would have seriously screwed up any explosive wiring inside and if there was a conspiracy it would not make any sense because they could not have known what kind of damage would have been caused to the building and the wiring by the WTC falling because of the tumbling chaotic nature of its collapse.

[edit on 7-1-2009 by newagent89]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:40 PM by g210b


The buildings and the circumstances are not the same.
The nature laws however are the same.

So why does one Builidng show a slow down as seen and by physical laws to expect and the other one shows no slow down at all?

Why did WTC 7 'self collapse' not even to the slightest look like that?

Just that this were 2 different buildings and circumstances leading to the collapse does not answer that.



   copyright & usage 















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.016 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.