What was the building made out of? Was it a tube within a tube? How long was it burning or was it ever on fire? Why was it demolished? Had it sustained damage prior to falling?

Why didn't it look like WTC7? Because it was not WTC7. You might say that WTC was a successful unplanned demolition but it was not controlled at all.

Besides, that massive vertical gash would have seriously screwed up any explosive wiring inside and if there was a conspiracy it would not make any sense because they could not have known what kind of damage would have been caused to the building and the wiring by the WTC falling because of the tumbling chaotic nature of its collapse.

[edit on 7-1-2009 by newagent89]

The buildings and the circumstances are not the same.
The nature laws however are the same.

So why does one Builidng show a slow down as seen and by physical laws to expect and the other one shows no slow down at all?

Why did WTC 7 'self collapse' not even to the slightest look like that?

Just that this were 2 different buildings and circumstances leading to the collapse does not answer that.