ufo skeptics - your understanding of ufos, please?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 10-1-2009 @ 01:00 PM by Nohup
Originally posted by elliotuk90
What do you think these crafts are?


Well, I'm not entirely sure they can be classified as "crafts" until somebody actually pops one open and everybody sees that they are a vehicle or probe of some sort. Until then, we can only really say they are some kind of "thing."

Anyway, short answer: I don't know.

Longer answer: Things flying around in the air is only a tiny fraction of the total "UFO experience." The actual experience includes an incredibly wide assortment of other phenomena, including stuff that is simply downright baffling and unexplainable. Time distortion or "displacement," stuff fading in and out of reality, psychic stuff, etc. Or the odd way several different responsible people can witness the same thing but come up with widely varied descriptions, as if they're all seeing something different. That's a puzzler.

People have a tendency to focus on the stuff like flying saucers because it's easier for them to put them into some kind of intellectual context they can deal with. "Alien spaceships" is probably the least imaginative of all the possible answers to this stuff.

One huge clue to the phenomenon is the continuing lack of good, solid proof (of anything) in spite of the huge volume of credible witnesses, radar tracks, and occasional physical trace evidence. What would cause this?

After pondering this for a couple of decades, I, and a number of other folks here, suspect that it all might be related to some unknown and subtle aspect of reality and the way we perceive it. The way we understand space and time is very limited. So these UFO things -- along with various ghosts and monsters and angels and aliens other stuff -- could possibly represent some kind of shift in reality or perception. A "shadow" of something from the future, or a different reality. A manifestation of our own consciousness brought into semi-reality in some way. A glimpse of a dream cooked up subconsciously by a lot of people. Or the consciousness of some super entity we're incapable of comprehending.

Not they they're illusions or pure hallucinations. More like... not quite entirely real as we understand reality, or transiently real. Physically real, but only for a few moments.

But this is extremely difficult to test and prove. We don't really even have good words to use to try and describe it. The best we can do is use a lot of fuzzy words cribbed from metaphysics. And because of this, we're having a hard time functionalizing our study of this stuff.

And, therefore, the best answer we have is: "I don't know."



reply posted on 10-1-2009 @ 05:12 PM by Majorion
reply to post by ArMaP




I think we can forget about this thread going anywhere..


Agreed ArMap

This debate has been beaten to death more often than not. Simply put.. skeptics are people who find the evidence to be lacking. And The middle types like myself find some evidence of things to be compelling and thus coming to my own conclusions about things that could be considered ridiculous to skeptics. And then there are the believers.. well.. too many scam artists and disinformation drive these people nuts, they are taken advantage of by the interconnected whackos in UFOlogy because they have a need to believe complex.

Maj


reply posted on 10-1-2009 @ 05:43 PM by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by elliotuk90



From the OP:


Hi, even though i am a firm believer in ufos being inteligently controled and not originating from earth...


See, wrong from the start.
UFOs are from earth.

Like who saw them, earth people.
Where were they seen, on earth.

Thinking otherwise makes you think too much.

What else you got.



reply posted on 11-1-2009 @ 12:06 PM by jackphotohobby
I don't want to get into a debate, this is just my opinion and you're welcome to yours, I'm not here to evangelise, or challenge people. Life's too short .

I'm a sceptic; I think UFOs are the following:

  • Misidentified aircraft; conventional, secret and military
  • Space related; space debris of extraterrestrial or terrestrial origin (space junk, bolides etc.), satellites, potentially military space programs
  • Weather phenomena causing optical distortion of objects at a distance
  • Unknown but potentially explainable phenomena with rational explanations

The extraterrestrial theory is possible but unlikely, I think, because of the distances involved (bar finding a hidden advanced civilisation in this solar system). If there is extraterrestrial life it would need to travel at the speed of light or beyond. Without that they'd have to have exceptionally long lives, or suspended animation and people that recognise them when they return hundreds (or thousands) of years later. Space is big. I think there's probably intelligent extraterrestrial life, but it is likely the case that we're so spread out from each-other that real-time communication is impossible or improbable.

But...

If it turns out that breaking (or even approaching) the speed of light is possible for large complex objects such as a space craft, then it could be possible. The question then becomes how such an advanced species could advance to the degree of breaking the speed of light – but not have similarly advanced stealth technology that is incredibly reliable. Similarly the computing power available to such a species would be phenomenal; they could accurately simulate a solar system, species included (hello The Matrix). Unless they made the leap to faster than light technology but somehow didn't make similar advances elsewhere – a highly unlikely situation.

I don't think people are reliable witnesses. I don't mean that in a negative way and I mean all people, myself included. Because we're not perfect recording devices. Our perception and memories are subject to many factors that aren't necessarily within our control. Take the famous (and damn cool) checkershadow illusion:

web.mit.edu...

If I didn't know that was an illusion and someone asked me if A & B were the same colour, I would emphatically state NO. But I'd be totally wrong. If I didn't know A & B were the same colour I would remember it as different colours. It wouldn't be my fault, and I would be telling the truth.

So, in summary, I think UFO reports are often true. I think a small minority of people are attention seeking and/or in it for financial gain/social status. But I think it is highly unlikely UFOs are alien.

[edit on 11-1-2009 by jackphotohobby]


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 11:10 AM by rickyrrr
reply to post by converge



I don't think it is fair to say that "there are no pictures of alien beings" There are many pictures of alien beings that have no means of being authenticated as real, but are assumed to be fake. Then there are other pictures of alien beings that are very obviously fake or that the person involved in their creation has come forward and positively identified them as fake.

I am always interested in uncovering who has hoaxed a picture, as this should not be an impossible task. But in the end, whatever remains remains unauthenticated, leaving it up to the viewer to decide for themselves what their opinion might be.

-rrr
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 27 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 190 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 8 hours ago, 80 replies