Too bad about the photograph of the guy with the cheap fur rug on his back. The flaps are very apparent. A lack of respect for whoever they're hopint to fool - they're too cheap or lazy to even bother with photoshop.

This kind of cheap hoaxery makes discussing the possibility of a still extant Megatherium (sp?) or giant sloth difficult.

The whole thing is reminiscent of the footage of an ape-like man that was circulating as proof of Yeti. A couple of the guys working on costumes when they were shooting the 1967 Planet of the Apes movie came forward years later admitting they'd done it for fun.


Mike F

looks like all 4 are just the same stuffed creature taken from different locations.
Just a prank.
but again I am bo giant Sloth expert.

Originally posted by mmiichael


Too bad about the photograph of the guy with the cheap fur rug on his back. The flaps are very apparent. A lack of respect for whoever they're hopint to fool - they're too cheap or lazy to even bother with photoshop.

This kind of cheap hoaxery makes discussing the possibility of a still extant Megatherium (sp?) or giant sloth difficult.

The whole thing is reminiscent of the footage of an ape-like man that was circulating as proof of Yeti. A couple of the guys working on costumes when they were shooting the 1967 Planet of the Apes movie came forward years later admitting they'd done it for fun.


Mike F

thanks Mike but I was the one who connected these two together I may be wrong and those pictures may be a hoaxed Bigfoot but again I ask why make it look like anything but a bigfoot?

Originally posted by SLAYER69

I was the one who connected these two together I may be wrong and those pictures may be a hoaxed Bigfoot but again I ask why make it look like anything but a bigfoot?

I have done a fair amount of photography analysis. If someone is good and tries it's almost impossible to spot changes. But this looks like it was shot with a 50 mil lens, and the figure is a guy with a 4 foot long fur carpet attached to the his forehead. You can see the texture and the outline.

About a 5 foot 6 human figure with human running body language. As the photographer was so close (30 ft max) and was able to get perfect focus and lighting conditions, why couldn't also get a shot of even the side of the animals face?

Slothful?


Mike F

It could be now advanced intelligence sloths doing false flag disinformation to deflect attention from themselves.

Bet no one can disprove that.


Mike F

well all the hype and hubbub aside ,I do think think it possible for something like this to exist they used to exist,their relatives exist, and I would settle for on that was somewhat smaller than the Giant one


no really entirely possible it's a big jungle

I still haven't found the video I have been looking for of an official search in northern South America

Everybody check around for me please

I have to tell this story. My brother and a few friends around 1975-77 were joy riding about 2:00 am in Chattsworth New Jersey which is in the Pine barrens. It's about 40 square miles of pine tree wilderness. They just
got their drivers licenses. About 50 yrds. down the road, a beast about 20 ft. tall walking on 2 feet, black fur with the head shaped like a bull crosses the road. The only thing it could be would be a Giant Gound Sloth. It's also one explanation for the Jersey devil. They are supposed to be vegetarian and are probably nocturnal or they would be seen much more often.

I cant believe people cant clearly see its a bear damnit! An american grizzley!

On the last photo you can kinda see a 4th claw on its right paw pointing inwards but its somewhat faded.

The third to last photo has a clear image of a grizzlies' pointed snout dark brown nose and eyes.

The two last photos i can see what your getting at but its probably just a tatty old bear with tatty matted fur.

The giant sloth died out long ago and may i say thank god with claws like those!

[edit on 25-2-2009 by NamiraNerd]