Can God create an object so heavy that even He cannot lift it?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 06:09 PM by Kaifan
reply to post by ps1klon3



Yes and no

God is the rock?

Wasn't this the subject of another thread a while ago?



reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 07:00 PM by ps1klon3
Originally posted by Lightmare
"Can God create an object so heavy that not even he can lift it?"

No offense but that is a really stupid question. Experience tells me that people who ask such stupid questions are usually trying to bait religious people into a debate.

There are two possible answers to the question. Yes he can or No he can't.

Either way, the point of the question is to get an answer which states that either God cannot create the object, or God cannot lift the object. Either way, it is meant to be understood as something that God cannot do...a concept which violates the doctrines of the religious.

At this point the person asking the question, usually someone who has a problem with "organised religion", begins the usual anti-religious rhetoric which usually consists of something like... "A HA!!! I knew it was all just a bunch crap that someone made up so they could control everything!!!" ...which usually ends up being a debate between the religious and the non-religious, both sides shouting insults at each other, and both sides failing to convert their opponents to their point of view. Nine times out of ten, it usually ends up being more trouble than its worth.

"Can God create an object so heavy that not even he can lift it?"

Before I can answer your question I must first ask you one of my own.

Why would God attempt to do such a pointless task?

[edit on 1/6/2009 by Lightmare]


Speaking from a religious stand point - nothing God does is pointless. It has a reason and a purpose. This is generally a question that I get from somebody who is non-religious and seem the think that "if he is all powerful, then can he?". I asked this question looking for a way to answer it with either a yes or a no with an explanation of why. Furthermore by stating "Experience tells me that people who ask such stupid questions are usually trying to bait religious people into a debate." You immediatly assumed that I was a non-religious person, which you cannot possibly know. Also, speaking from a religious standpoint, I was looking for a way to address this kind of question from someone who is unbiased, knowledgeable, and can back up any claims made as to yes He can or no He cant. If you cannot come to a yes or a no answer WITH proven evidence, then why reply as this post was meant for an answer. You have already shown that you cannot even do such a simple task as that. Oh, and by the way, I dont have a problem with organized religion.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 07:42 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Lightmare



Fundamentalists would probably say (and I think may have already said above) that the question is faulty because their god can create an infinitely large rock and also lift it. I would say the opposite. I think the rock conundrum shows that the concept of omnipotence is what is faulty. That is why I would disagree with Lightmare when he says that it would be a "pointless task" for a god to attempt. Would it not at least prove, Lightmare, that the concept of omnipotence is not as illogical, impossible and wildly contradictory as it seems?


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 08:03 PM by ps1klon3
reply to post by badmedia



Look at the definitions of each:
1: an unstoppable force is a force in which nothing can stop
2: an immovable object is an object in which nothing can move

Object and Force are 2 completly different things.

[edit] - To be more clear, an object is something that has mass or takes up space whereas Force is that which can cause an object WITH mass to accelerate (move).

[edit on 6-1-2009 by ps1klon3]


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 08:08 PM by badmedia
Originally posted by ps1klon3
reply to
post by badmedia



Look at the definitions of each:
1: an unstoppable force is a force in which nothing can stop
2: an immovable object is an object in which nothing can move

Object and Force are 2 completly different things.


But are they really different? Is the object not a force? Is there not a force that makes it as such?

And does the force not treat something the same way an object would? As if an object was hitting you?

Does each not occupy a "space" as per the question of them being in the same space?

Seems to me, it's just that you can see the object, and you can't see the force. Only thing that really makes them different as far as I can tell. Kind of like putting a light on a car at night, and calling it an object, then turning the lights off and calling it a force. You get hit by either - same result.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 08:16 PM by ps1klon3
reply to post by badmedia



Ah, I edited my last post to be more clear.

Object - has mass and takes up space
Force - force is that which can cause an object with mass to accelerate.

[edit on 6-1-2009 by ps1klon3]


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 01:38 PM by Grandma
reply to post by ps1klon3



God is a spirit. He doesn't need to move. He is after all God, The Almighty, The Maker of Heaven and Earth, The Creator of all things above and below.

To me the question is mute.


Peace,
Grandma
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



I Am Christ-The Almighty!
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags
The Pope\'s Advice for ATS (and others)
  Posted 15 days ago with 10 member flags
God\'s Judgment on homosexuality.
  Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
The Bringer of Light
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags
Christ! My Hero!
  Posted 4 days ago with 9 member flags
WTF just happend to me?
  Posted 2 days ago with 9 member flags
End of the world, You should start paying attention! WW3
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags
Van Gogh\'s "Starry Night"
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags