January 21, or 22 crisis, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 06:00 PM by Curious_Agnostic
I don't recall Powell saying the exact date, but I just found this article:
bretthenebery.wordpress.com...
I don't know the site, or how reliable it is.

edit - Oh, wait, I remember it now. He did say that, but I guess most people have concluded something similar to the post above.

Also, Obama becomes president on the 20th, not the 21st.



[edit on 1/6/2009 by Curious_Agnostic]


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 06:56 PM by slicobacon
reply to post by statickitt3n



The war is bad enough but the earthquakes at Yellowstone have me more worried. As you said though Powell and Cheney have a date nailed down -so that precludes a natural disaster. I hope the US stays out of the Israeli mess, we need to work on taking care of our own house.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 07:47 PM by statickitt3n
Originally posted by slicobacon
reply to
post by statickitt3n



The war is bad enough but the earthquakes at Yellowstone have me more worried. As you said though Powell and Cheney have a date nailed down -so that precludes a natural disaster. I hope the US stays out of the Israeli mess, we need to work on taking care of our own house.


To be honest, for me it was a toss up between the war or Yellowstone as being the crisis that was being spoken of. I have been paying close attention to the activity at Yellowstone, and it really concerns me.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 09:09 PM by BSndsMPBlk47
It seems to me that anytime within a few weeks of Inauguration Day (January 20th) would be a great time for the 51st state of USreal to bomb Iran, causing anti-ship missiles purchased from Russia and China to be fired at Usreal ships, destroying a large chunk of our Navies. I suppose Venezuela could chime in for disastrous results. If Iran was to receive a massive U.S. attack, then perhaps we could destroy the missiles before they are even launched.

So I don't think the "crisis on January 21st or 22nd" will be Israel/Iran, nor can I see it being Yellowstone.



In order for an Obama-led false flag event to occur he needs his team in place I would think. As for the New World Order Cabal sending him a message goes, I don't think so:

1) He received $750 million in donations. Where did that come from? Homeless shelters? I doubt it. He must be considered reliable by the powers-that-be.

2) He is planning on bringing in familiar faces, giving us a Clintonesque administration (minus the oral sex of course).



So I see only two possibilities. One is that there is something about Obama so scary that some country (Russia? or China?) does not want him in. This person who went to school in Indonesia and probably had an Indonesian passport would have been an idea recruit as far as "intelligence" agencies such as the CIA are concerned. As a forum member going by the moniker ProtoplasmicTraveler opined:

Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Travel to Pakistan in 1981 could have only included one of two things for an extended period as Americans were barred from entry which is why he travelled on his Indonesian Passport. One he was either studying the Quran at an Islamic Madras or he was working as an intelligence officer on behalf of an intelligence agency. The CIA and FBI have both long been desperate for Arab and Muslim agents that can infiltrate into Arab and Muslim countries and groups here in our country. They place a premium on such recruits and look for them specifically at College Campuses.


He would have to be pretty scary since we have already had Trilateralists and Bonesmen in the White House. Both Bushes were probably spooks too.

This scenario makes sense since a nation or other large organization could be expected to wait and see if Obama is actually allowed to take office.



The other possibility is that the purpose of a crisis on January 21 or 22 is to create a great eight year "honeymoon" period during which he can get whatever he wants past Congress. Congress will give him what he wants -- and who he wants in top positions requiring Congressional approval.

This senario makes sense too. Who can blame a President that has only been in office one or two days?



[edit on 6-1-2009 by BSndsMPBlk47]


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 09:35 AM by BSndsMPBlk47
Originally posted by BSndsMPBlk47

...I see only two possibilities. One is that there is something about Obama so scary that some country (Russia? or China?) does not want him in. This person who went to school in Indonesia and probably had an Indonesian passport would have been an idea recruit as far as "intelligence" agencies such as the CIA are concerned. As a forum member going by the moniker ProtoplasmicTraveler opined:

Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Travel to Pakistan in 1981 could have only included one of two things for an extended period as Americans were barred from entry which is why he travelled on his Indonesian Passport. One he was either studying the Quran at an Islamic Madras or he was working as an intelligence officer on behalf of an intelligence agency. The CIA and FBI have both long been desperate for Arab and Muslim agents that can infiltrate into Arab and Muslim countries and groups here in our country. They place a premium on such recruits and look for them specifically at College Campuses.


He would have to be pretty scary since we have already had Trilateralists and Bonesmen in the White House. Both Bushes were probably spooks too.

This scenario makes sense since a nation or other large organization could be expected to wait and see if Obama is actually allowed to take office.



The other possibility is that the purpose of a crisis on January 21 or 22 is to create a great eight year "honeymoon" period during which he can get whatever he wants past Congress. Congress will give him what he wants -- and who he wants in top positions requiring Congressional approval.

This senario makes sense too. Who can blame a President that has only been in office one or two days?



[edit on 6-1-2009 by BSndsMPBlk47]


I keep coming up with more possibilities. It is possible that the desired outcome is the perception that Obama is being tested or that there is something in his past that makes foreign nations or organizations particularly fearful and/or angry. What people on the left (and some isolationists and libertarians on the right) are lead to think regarding Obama's past may be more important than the reality itself from a political perspective. Likewise what everyone else is lead to believe -- that Obama is being tested -- may also be more important than the reality itself from a political perspective. Consequently, the desired outcome -- the rip in the fabric of the nation being worsened -- will have been achieved.

This is especially true if the crisis is a terrorist attack or the result of a false-flag operation. Obama is just as tested if it occurs January 19th (too late for the lame duck to do anything) or Febuary 5th as he would be if it was to occur on the 22nd. The only thing I can think of that changes in this case is perception.

Whether you are a Muslim terrorist who hates American freedoms so much you want to create an omnipotent consecutive-term president or a government agent looking for the same outcome, January 21st or 22nd is perhaps the ideal time after all.

[edit on 7-1-2009 by BSndsMPBlk47]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 113 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 88 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 63 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 54 replies