reply to post by SonicInfinity
Well you are overlooking the fact that I watched your cartoon, and considered it before coming to the conclusion that it was a writer poking fun at
conspiracy theorists.
The Aglet thing was so obviously untrue that it clued me in, hence the "gut feeling" that I was left with that dissuaded me from pursuing the matter
further.
One has a limited amount of time and energy as a human. It is wise to use discrimination or discernment to narrow down the things one chooses to
spend ones time on. If I had just completely turned a blind eye, I would have stopped the moment I saw Superman on the screen. I didnt, I watched
it, drew a conclusion and thats that.
If you actually do pursue every single claim, no matter how fantastical as your rebuttal of me seems to indicate, you must be a very busy person. All
those unicorns, Flying Spaghetti monsters and such to research....
[edit on 6-1-2009 by Illusionsaregrander]