Australia 'destroying life on Earth', page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 08:58 AM by nixie_nox
reply to post by ExamineAllViews


Agreed.

And here, whoever the person is, is opening the door for Austrailians to lead the way, be the leaders, have the economic advantage of the green race by developing alternative energy. AU is also one of the richest nations on Earth and has a rich culture. You have so many advantages and opportunities.And the response is, I will drink and burn styrofoam. Wow, what leadership.


Considering the Great Barrier Reef is a huge tourist attraction for you, it would be in your best interest to keep it.


Actually, what this guy is saying makes me wonder if AU possibly has a very large coal deposit. The US right now contains most of the world's coal. If we used it as a primary source, we could be self sufficient.

Either that, or the way AU is located on the planet has a far more profound effect then other continents. Size isn't everything.

But coal is a dirty nasty business from cradle to grave. And no one wants it.

From mining, to processing, to burning and disposing, it is terrible. As someone who grew up near coal towns, it's catastrophic effects can be felt for a long, LONG time, even after the mine is closed.


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 11:43 AM by pteridine
reply to post by Blue Flowers


You said: "The magnets create electricity for the HHO, the HHO creates electricty, and gas if needed."

The only problem with this scheme is the arithmetic. You are getting more energy out than you are putting in. Electrolysis of water is nothing new and is 80% efficient at best. Why not just use the magnets to make electricity and skip the electrolysis?

BTW, "HHO " is a complete scam.


reply posted on 25-1-2009 @ 06:35 AM by woogleuk
reply to post by tezzajw


woaaah mate, i respect what your saying, but a couple of a-bombs dropped in hostile action are nothing compared to testing of the bloody things, but when the british (and im british) wanted to test them, the aussies agreed to let them do it pretty much on their soil, it was wrong, but we learn by our mistakes, thats why we dont test them now.


reply posted on 25-1-2009 @ 06:56 AM by woogleuk
reply to post by Obliterated


Obliterated, what are you talking about? The Vietnamese and koreans are sending dog meat to McDonalds, thats snoopy and spot your eating man.


reply posted on 25-1-2009 @ 07:04 AM by Obliterated
reply to post by woogleuk


But our maccas wrappers say 100% Australian Beef. We are huge in the beef supply business. We have lots of cows.

I can't believe NASA space people are blaming us for stuff. Who the hell do these people think they are? They should go back to trying to find aliens and leave our cows alone.

As for the coal thing... Nothing beats a coal BBQ with 100% Australian beef chops!

Sorry, I have to defend my country but I don't know what people are talking about, so i'm just saying stuff to divert attention from the real issue (the cows) and make people hungry.



reply posted on 25-1-2009 @ 07:14 AM by Master Shen long
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by Obliterated


Obliterated, what are you talking about? The Vietnamese and koreans are sending dog meat to McDonalds, thats snoopy and spot your eating man.


I fear your stupidity is only exceeded by your flouride intake...... You will find very few dog eaters in the Asia nowdays, 95% of Asians frown upon this act.


reply posted on 25-1-2009 @ 07:37 AM by woogleuk
reply to post by Master Shen long


Dude i was joking, i know that, i have the faces of death videos, i can watch them and eat my dinner, but the dog thin turns my stomach, i know its different now, but still................
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^