I have seen a link in you tube to a new electricity creating device made..get this now! Made of MAGNETS..and in australia. yep oh and spinning bearings etc..

So what a better way to creat power?! Or keep it a simple rig. Get stainless steel plates. Make an HHO unit, figure out magnetic repulsion/attraction techniques yourself. And everyone just take like one or two years and convert your houses to this genius earth and liberty freindly idea.

The magnets create electricity for the HHO, the HHO crerates electricty, and gas if needed.

Dont mess with HHO though or electricity if you dont know what your doing, it can be a hazard.

But if you make more than a car batteries worth, it becomes more dangerous. So in my theory, i have my unit undercground. And equipped with meters etc.. away from structures as well and marked like a gas line would be.

Perhaps if we spread out, created a free society of science and drive (motivation) and got over our religion, our politicis. It would take us into new realms of perception, and fulfill the words of many drunks and rock stars of our history.



[edit on 8-1-2009 by Blue Flowers]

So with this muppet in charge of GISS, does anyone actually believe their models or temperature series any longer?

Given the level of advocacy that Hansen engages in, IMO it would be foolish to assume that GISS really produces unbiased scientific results. It is no wonder that the longer time goes on, the cooler past temperatures get using the GISS algorithms, funnily enough ensuring an increasing warming trend over time...

Hansen should stick to armwaving about his models and stay out of the political arena. After all, NASA scientists should be scientists and not advocates.

Originally posted by ExamineAllViews
This thread wouldn't be a troll's attempt to fuel some good old "Anti-Americanism" sentiment would it?

Please don't try and overthink my motivation. Getting it wrong would make your attempt look foolish.

I saw a news title that was, quite frankly, hilarious. I've never seen Australia accused of destroying the world before.

I don't care who made the accusation. In this case it's a NASA scientist, go figure. One hot-air agency accusing us Aussies of making too much hot air.

good things c02 is what plants breath and the more we have, the more plant life we have.. which means we have a smaller food crisis.. 98% of greenhouse gasses are water vapour aka clouds

our temperature has more to do with solar radiation than man mad gasses.. we contribute one percent at most..

look at the other planets in our solar system

look at the polar ice caps which grew 33% this year.. look at the coldest winter in 25 years worldwide this year

Take your criticism back to your own god-damn country.

Australia is destroying all life on Earth

G-d darn Army of cloned Kangaroos has had us on the run for years now where i'm stationed, they have terrible aim with an assault rifle but you should hear the screams of my men... as they get boxed in the balls by a Roo... it's sickening...

I've seen the vids that have leaked out from the Australian camps... Not Pretty

Big Roos smoking entire pieces of Coal, apparently the coal gets them high, i've seen them take bullets and barely notice... they feed on our troops, no captives, just lunch... heard rumors of medical experiments and worse...

Australia is indeed a menace

Originally posted by mopusvindictus
Australia is destroying all life on Earth

G-d darn Army of cloned Kangaroos has had us on the run for years now where i'm stationed, they have terrible aim with an assault rifle but you should hear the screams of my men... as they get boxed in the balls by a Roo... it's sickening...

I've seen the vids that have leaked out from the Australian camps... Not Pretty

Big Roos smoking entire pieces of Coal, apparently the coal gets them high, i've seen them take bullets and barely notice... they feed on our troops, no captives, just lunch... heard rumors of medical experiments and worse...

Australia is indeed a menace

I would be more affraid if or when the koalas will teamup with the Big Roos. I don't want to make anybody paraiond, but I am wondering if the koalas and the Big Roos had any ideas to what happened with Harold Holt.

Let's get real. Population has little to do with this. The reason Australia emits so much 'per person' is because of our industry. Aluminium smelting that often has a dedicated powerplant. You don't like it? Dont buy Aluminium. I'm sure that will bode well with NASA.

Originally posted by nerbot

Originally posted by watch_the_rocks
Australia releases 326,757 tonnes per year of CO2.
The U.S. releases 6,049,435 tonnes per year.

BUT....

U.S. population: 300,000,000

Australia population: 21,000,000

Australia has about 15% the population of the U.S. but releases about 3.5% more emissions.

Fact is....BOTH countries emit TOO much don't they?

Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black (from soot!)

Uhhh.... maybe my math is wrong. But America emits 1751% more emissions than Australia, not the other way around . 5.4% THE Emissions of America.

[edit on 9/1/2009 by C0bzz]

I hate to tell you this.
But some third world country's burn old tires to get power.
Burning coal in a modern country with the emission filtering policies is alot less harmfull than some situations where there is even more people doing it more.
Although its still harmful.

I bet money this guy is just trying to get picked from some committee or position in the Oboma League.

It is just a kiss up letter and Australia is an easy target without much political backlash.

Those poor climate-crisis alarmists. When will they get a life and stop trying to scare people over problems that do not exist. Over the centuries Earth has endured many real events like volcano eruptions, huge quakes and floods. Yet the planet is still here and thriving. Earth will survive us and does not need to be saved.

First it was over-population, then it was the coming ice age, now it's global warming. If people are the problem, stop passing gas or commit mass suicide...do it for the planet!

Enough crisis-mongering!

This is one of those false premise arguments. Here we are debating emissions, but the tech which could make the whole world green is being deliberately supressed.

PROTIP: If someone talks about the environment, but doesn't mention hemp in the same speech, the are lying. So the NASA dude who wrote the article is, at best, uninformed.

Hemp could solve at least 70 per cent of the worlds enviro-problems, including deforestation, polluting plastics and a load of other things.

But they get us arguing about these false figures.

NASA

Never
A
Straight
Answer

Come on people, this is NASA! Disinfo is their business.

There does seem to be a lot of news coming out of OZ being put out for public consumption here in the USA though. Wonder what’s up with that? Time will tell.