2012 mass hoax?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 08:39 PM by drsmooth23
2012 hoax?


Click on add a comment and you can see where mindcarnival posted something that isnt showing up, possibly becase of a global "ignore"or something similar..... here is the text, and i hope he/she didnt porposefully remove it, if so, u2u me and ill remove this
------------------------------------------------------
mindcarnival

posted on 5-1-2009 at 21:25

what if all the talk about 2012 is preparation for the staging of a 2012 scenario. No god or supernatural just a worldwide hoax to trick and scare people for some kind of worldwide agenda. Maybe its the apocalypse. The bible(and other stuff relating to 2012 and whatnot) has beeen around since forever, who knows maybe the leaders of the recent past and now have read it and asked Is that possible? So have we. But were not working behind the scenes deciding that. Perhaps the technology we use can be used against us as an illusion. Technology is cool but most of us don't know much about it if it means researching and advancing it. Then again for what purpose?


HAIL BUSH!

[edit on 5-1-2009 by drsmooth23]

[edit on 5-1-2009 by drsmooth23]



reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 09:40 PM by drsmooth23
reply to post by BASSPLYR



I agree with you about people not wanting to talk about some thing because you dont make alot of friends by 'knowing it all', thats for sure, haha. My biggest thing is this;

Two scenarios of the worst case kind when talking about the end days;

A: some people are wiped out
B: all life is wiped out

both lead you to a general, "my time is up; F-it" philosophy, but you must never become complacent, like, im gonna just sit back and ride this out. because with (A) alot of these people will be screwed because they are drunk* or whatever. As long as you look at an apocalyptic event like "yeah, i can get through this", then i think we'll be just fine. i personally would like to go down kicking, or copulating, actually.






*and just to clarify, you can still be drunk and a bad 'donkey' apocalyptic like Bruce Campbell at the same time!! haha!


reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 09:42 PM by drsmooth23
reply to post by BASSPLYR



As far as fads go, yeah, i kind of see it, but its kind of like a nerd fad like a rubicks cube or something, haha.

I dont hear much about it in the candyshop/mainstream,

but thats why im here posting, because I enjoy it.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:07 AM by matth
reply to post by TSOM87



I see where you're coming from, but I don't think that the comparison to Y2K is a smart comparison, even though I've heard/seen it be used a lot.

When you eliminate all of the BS surrounding Y2K, the just of it was that we as a collective group panicked and freaked out over a hypothetical computer glitch that was hypothetically supposed to destroy our planet via nuclear bombs going off without warning and all computer systems crashing due to this hypothetical glitch. It was never explained how exactly something like this could happen simply because the year on a computer went from 1999 to 1901, but that didn't matter, because our fear based society jumped right on the bandwagon and started crapping our pants over the issue.

So, because of that fact, I don't blame anybody for thinking 2012 will be nothing more than Y2K. The problem is, and what people fail to remember, is that that MSM/big business didn't invent 2012 to sensationalize the possibility of the end of the world for profit, like they did with Y2K. 2012 has been called for thousands of years, by many different cultures that had no communication with each other (that we can prove, at least). And every time the 2012 number pops up in those cultures, they don't speak of the end of times, they simply speak of a great change, a great enlightenment, a golden age, etc...no Armageddon.

Do I think the MSM and big business are currently trying to sensationalize 2012 into something it's not, for the sake of profit and to keep us afraid? You're darn tootin' I do. But all that does is make me come to the conclusion that the mainstream, corporate owned media cannot be trusted on the subject of 2012 (or any other subject for that matter), and that I should be doing my own objective, unbiased research on 2012; which would really tie in well with the motto of this site (Deny Ignorance, in case people have forgot, lol).

[edit on 8-1-2009 by matth]


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 03:42 PM by Anonymous ATS




reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 08:14 PM by Byrd
Since I was a computer programmer, I can answer this:

Originally posted by matth
When you eliminate all of the BS surrounding Y2K, the just of it was that we as a collective group panicked and freaked out over a hypothetical computer glitch that was hypothetically supposed to destroy our planet via nuclear bombs going off without warning and all computer systems crashing due to this hypothetical glitch. It was never explained how exactly something like this could happen simply because the year on a computer went from 1999 to 1901,


Actually, we DID explain it, and university trained computer programmers had dealt with it since 1980 or so (when I learned about it in a Cobol programming class.) We did have one system that was old and got caught in the Y2K bug... it happened to be the security system for the city jail. The program had been written by a company that was now out of business, and the locks wouldn't secure or unlock at the correct time.

We solved it by telling the computer that it was 1993 instead of 2000 and things worked just fine. We did replace the software with something else later on, but for a few hours on one day the security system was an issue.

2012 has been called for thousands of years, by many different cultures that had no communication with each other (that we can prove, at least). And every time the 2012 number pops up in those cultures, they don't speak of the end of times, they simply speak of a great change, a great enlightenment, a golden age, etc...no Armageddon.


Actually, they don't.

The Mayan calendar ends there, but they have inscription dates that stretch further into the future. Most ancient civilizations measured their years not from a fixed point but from the reigning year of the current monarch. So, 54 BC to the ancient Egyptians is "year 3 of the reign of Cleopatra VII". They had no way of enumerating a date 2,000 years in their future.

Same with the Babylonians and Sumerians. Many civilizations (Native Americans, Australian aborigines, Germans, Goths, Vikings) kept accounts of years but didn't have a starting point. Rome had a "year zero" that was set in what was believed to be the founding of the city of Rome (archaeological digs proved they were really really wrong about the date, but it didn't matter.)

The Hindu have a tradition of Great Cycles but none of them coincided with 2012.

Basically the whole thing was started by Jose Arguelles, who had another similar pronouncement about the "harmonic convergence" in the 1980's. When the 80's came and went and the predictions didn't come true, he switched them over so that they would happen "in 2012."

Unfortunately, people don't listen to historians. I'm afraid they listen to New Age writers. Now the "End Times" Christians have also snagged on the date, adding to the tension over this upcoming non-event.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 08:34 PM by Johnathanrs
reply to post by matth



Do I think the MSM and big business are currently trying to sensationalize 2012 into something it's not, for the sake of profit and to keep us afraid? You're darn tootin' I do. But all that does is make me come to the conclusion that the mainstream, corporate owned media cannot be trusted on the subject of 2012 (or any other subject for that matter), and that I should be doing my own objective, unbiased research on 2012; which would really tie in well with the motto of this site (Deny Ignorance, in case people have forgot, lol).

(One of the best paragraph's i've read all day. )
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russians know, We assume, NASA is silent ...
  Posted 10 days ago with 35 member flags
Sun flares affect our pineal gland, causing mass awakening?
  Posted 2 days ago with 34 member flags
Are we paying attention enough? Strange Sounds in the sky
  Posted 17 days ago with 33 member flags
Bring Your Toothbrush? A Journey To The Stars...
  Posted 8 days ago with 23 member flags
2012 Believers are the Definition of Sheeple
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
Tell me to stop
  Posted 7 days ago with 11 member flags
The Chevy Silverado 2012 Mayan Apocalpse Commercial
  Posted 7 days ago with 10 member flags