The so called helpless man in question was another thuglife street punk that started a fight with a fellow comuter on the train when the fellow commuter defended his girlfriend who was being harrassed over her New Years Attire!

I was there saw the whole thing go down and I applaud B.A.R.T. police for a job well done!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by SKINWALKER2K9
The so called helpless man in question was another thuglife street punk that started a fight with a fellow comuter on the train when the fellow commuter defended his girlfriend who was being harrassed over her New Years Attire!

I was there saw the whole thing go down and I applaud B.A.R.T. police for a job well done!!!!!!!!!!!

So everyone look at this posters comments and I defy anyone to tell me this isn't the words of sheeple brain washing that will see in the NWO police state unhindered, nay welcomed!

Look poster I like you wish we didn't have these 'Thugs' your right but simply killing them isn't the correct response in any society. He's a product of your/our society, lack of parents (or parents just as ignorant as he clearly was if he was acting thuggishly - don't know wasn't there?) or prenatal love. But, isn't this just the sort of behaviour required from society to justify the defence budgets, the controls and removal of your human right to unhindered liberty? No, that ‘Thug’ wasn’t born a thug he was created.

i think they shot that guy cuz he told them "F you pigs!"

is it a coincidence hes black also? hope so

cuz this has the potential to cause some riots

Just remember Rodney King actually didnt die, but this kid here, died.

Originally posted by ALLis0NE
It is "typical" for a Negro to be in "involved" in a crime involving aggression.

If this victim in the video was not "involved", then he would still be alive today. So the reason he got shot? Because he was "involved", which is typical for a Negro statistically, and physiologically.

Still digging that hole I see

You should be halfway to China by now, keep up the good work mate

Originally posted by SKINWALKER2K9
The so called helpless man in question was another thuglife street punk that started a fight with a fellow comuter on the train when the fellow commuter defended his girlfriend who was being harrassed over her New Years Attire!

I was there saw the whole thing go down and I applaud B.A.R.T. police for a job well done!!!!!!!!!!!

That, by LAW does not justify shooting a subdued, unarmed man in the back. That, my unconscionable friend, is called cowardice, and murder in may states.

---

---

Originally posted by SKINWALKER2K9
The so called helpless man in question was another thuglife street punk that started a fight with a fellow comuter on the train when the fellow commuter defended his girlfriend who was being harrassed over her New Years Attire!

I was there saw the whole thing go down and I applaud B.A.R.T. police for a job well done!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, sorry people looked at the posters information. Nothing to see here its a deliberate baiting post from a virtually anonymous poster just trying to make us react the way I obviously did. Best Ignore this one

Originally posted by MoonMine

Originally posted by defcon5
Spitting at a police officer is a Felony in many states for this very reason.

Preposterous, HIV cannot be transmitted by spitting at someone.

Ever hear of gingivitis?

And blood surely can transmit HIV.

Originally posted by defcon5
I already covered this above somewhere, but to charge an officer with manslaughter you have to show that they did something intentionally negligent. Like if the guy modified his weapon, or was in the habit of handling it unsafely. Police are given a large amount of leeway in making mistakes, even when it costs someone their life. As I have already stated above though, it will most likely end his career as a police officer.

Well it's simple really.

Either he drew his weapon intending to use it given the situation unfolding, which then is criminally negligent homicide as there was no reason for him to pull the trigger - Or he drew his weapon bu accident and it discharged accidentally, which is then involuntary manslaughter - and yes, if his was only in fear of his safety based on the commotion around him, he was negligent in his care of duty in that situation as the kid was not a threat yet he still drew his weapon.

Also if you read my other posts, you will see that one of the other reasons I truly feel that he did not intend to use his firearm is because of the proximity to other officers who were struggling with the victim.

He still drew his weapon when it was not required. That is neglect. And it would be murder had the roles be reversed.

An officer is not going to discharge his weapon when the person could easily pull one of his fellow officers into the line of fire at the last second, or where the shot could ricochet off the floor and strike another officer.

Therefore, involuntary manslaughter. Neglect not only in that he drew it, but he was in close proximity of his fellow officers and put them at real risk of death or serious injury also.

Basically, I see absolutely no case in which he CAN NOT be charged with a crime, BUT I know what sort of world we live in, and I know that it will be swept as much under the carpet as possible. Cops are above the law, don't you know.

As to your remark about the other case, I guess I just don't get it.

Get what? I was referring to the same case, I only mentioned the perth trains because the atmos here can be exactly as rowdy as it appeared on that video, and would lead to no good outcome if you mix with it an inexperienced cop who has no ability to step back from the situation and consider his next actions very carefully.

The whole HIV convo is a destraction. It doesn't matter.

There are multiple diseases, infections, and viruses, that could be spread through saliva, or spit. No matter what, spitting on someone is equivalent to defecating on someone.

It's assault in today's world