Full Page Newspaper Ad Questioning Chem-trail Dangers, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 07:53 PM by doctordoom
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



Extremely important topic.

People have no idea the suffering that this has caused, and will cause.

Generations are going to suffer.


The closely watched annual health spending figures released today by the federal government were published, fittingly enough, in the January/February issue of the journal Health Affairs. Fittingly, because this month's issue is devoted to chronic illness, and about 75 percent of the $2.2 trillion the United States spends on healthcare goes toward treating chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. That $2.2 trillion works out to $7,421 per person

www.usnews.com...

Skeptics deny all you want. The truth will be known, weather you like it or not.



reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 08:56 PM by Exuberant1
reply to post by OzWeatherman



"The lab report stated that there were high levels of nasties but it was unlikely that the elements found were from an airborne source"

Well then where did the high levels of "nasties" come from?

All he did was a test a sample that was given to him right?

*He didn't collect it, so how did he come to this determination?


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:08 AM by Chadwickus
Ahhh Rense.com that alone should send warning bells off for most people.

So we got some lab test results, it doesn't really have too many specifics does it? Did they even use sterilised testing equipment? It would be good to know exactly how they performed the tests.

Moving on, it seems whoever wrote the article didn't do their homework:
The US military has openly stated it is their goal to "OWN THE WEATHER" by 2025.


Talk about beating a dead horse!
From
HERE

Disclaimer

2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government. This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only. This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared for public release.


_______________________________________________________________


I'm a firm believer that contaminated soil and water samples are caused not by chemtrails, but by industry and mining.

Here's a list of contaminated waste sites in Shasta and it's surrounding countys:

J.H. Baxter & CO

Grey Eagle Mine

Iron Mountain Mine

Celtor Chemical Works

Del Norte Pesticide Storage

Don't forget these are the known sites that have contaminated the environment around them.

I got this list from HERE

There are over a hundred contaminated sites in California alone.


Here's a link to a previous thread I started regarding industry emissions:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

From THIS site it shows in 2006 The state of California produced 2,547,883 pounds of barium and aluminium waste.


Still blaming contrails in the sky?





[edit on 7-1-2009 by Chadwickus]


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:10 AM by Exuberant1
reply to post by Chadwickus



"Ahhh Rense.com that alone should send warning bells off for most people. "

But doesn't he just link to other sources?

What sort of 'warning bells' should be set off by an article making it onto his website?


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:14 AM by Chadwickus
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to
post by Chadwickus



"Ahhh Rense.com that alone should send warning bells off for most people. "

But doesn't he just link to other sources?

What sort of 'warning bells' should be set off by an article making it onto his website?



The alarm bells are because he will post ANYTHING that he believes strengthens his "cause"

From inaccurate test results to misquoted documents.

Why don't you focus on the rest of my post rather than my dig at a disreputable website?

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags