Did a ufo hit wind turbine in Conisholme UK? See picture and news article.., page 28
Pages: <<  25    26    27    28    29  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 46 times


reply posted on 21-1-2009 @ 01:05 PM by Mr Green
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to
post by Mr Green



"Maybe its an invasion of alien sea creatures "

They appear to be a primitive life form normally only visible in the infrared and UV spectrums. The critters in the STS space tether incident are likely these bioforms.



Really my friend and I were joking about this being caused from an alien invasion of sea creatures, I had no idea things like this may exist.



reply posted on 21-1-2009 @ 01:05 PM by Phage
reply to post by free_spirit


Not sure what your point is.
Just to clarify, that video is of a wind farm in Watchfield and is from August of last year.

[edit on 1/21/2009 by Phage]


reply posted on 22-1-2009 @ 06:02 AM by rikgrimsby
uk.video.yahoo.com...

here is a video i took this week.as you can see what ever hit it moved it(all the other wind turbines are facing the same way).they still havnt fixed it...... it has been moved quit a bit as well by the looks of things

[edit on 22-1-2009 by rikgrimsby]


reply posted on 22-1-2009 @ 06:18 AM by Mr Green
reply to post by rikgrimsby



hey thanks for that, good to see it in its normal environment. It looks so sad and broken amongst all the others that are working. This case is really odd isnt it.


reply posted on 22-1-2009 @ 09:33 AM by Phage
Originally posted by rikgrimsby
uk.video.yahoo.com...

here is a video i took this week.as you can see what ever hit it moved it(all the other wind turbines are facing the same way).they still havnt fixed it...... it has been moved quit a bit as well by the looks of things

[edit on 22-1-2009 by rikgrimsby]


The operational turbines are facing the same direction because the turbine heads rotate according to the wind direction. The broken one, being broken, does not do so. That is why it is facing a different direction than the others, not because of anything that happened when it was damaged.



reply posted on 24-1-2009 @ 03:10 PM by tarifa37
Whats this another wind turbine hit by a UFO?



Those ufo's need to get some reversing sensors

[edit on 24-1-2009 by tarifa37]


reply posted on 28-1-2009 @ 05:24 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by SugarCube


A collision with a low flying 'object' with a rotating blade could certainly cause distortion, or damage to a fibreglass blade structure. Having lost one blade from the hub could readily cause a second blade to be thrown or ripped off the hub by centrifugal force and inbalance, hence the blade found on the ground adjacent to the mast.

An object to cause such damage to a rotating blade is likely to have been 'flying' horizontally rather than downwards, aided by gravity as a meteorite would likely be. So stick to the UAV concept. Small (well, relatively), fast and requiring remote control via a video link from a ground-based operator somwhere.

Don't waste your time thinking about the Red Arrows, they're far too busy keeping in formation to mess around with external devices. Also, they don't fly in the dark!

The wreckage from a UAV accident could be rapidly gathered and carried away on the back of a Land-Rover or 4x4 truck, both quickly and stealthily if required. Coloured lights - stick to the fireworks display account. Quit all the spurious explanations and think before you post!


reply posted on 29-1-2009 @ 03:35 AM by ignorant_ape
reply to post by tarifa37



IMHO - no and it amazes me that people can so quickly jump tp the " UFO / aliens did it " hurrdling over all the mundane posibilities

look at the vid - i cannot tell if they are free from any impact damage - but all 3 blades look ` significantly intact `

the seat of fire is clearly the generator hub , the cause of the fire could be any number of reasoins - electrical short curcuite or failure of a bearing being the two mist likley

look at this pic :



are you going to blamre a ufo for this too ????????????????


reply posted on 29-1-2009 @ 07:58 AM by TrueBrit
reply to post by ignorant_ape



Now , do you mean that the OP wind turbine is intact ? Because I can say with certainty, no it isnt .


reply posted on 29-1-2009 @ 08:22 AM by Wig
reply to post by TrueBrit



If you look at this post it says it is posted in reply to you in a clickable link of your username. If you click your username on my post you will be taken to your post, in other words you will be shown the post of yours that this post is a response to.

Now that you understand this, have another look at the ignorant_ape post to which you just replied. The answer to your question is there.


reply posted on 31-1-2009 @ 07:16 AM by ignorant_ape
reply to post by Mr Green




you also have to ask the question :

regardless of that the report says , will it be universally accepted ?

it they say mechanical failure - UFO hardliners will scream cover up

IF they say ` IMPACT , ORIGIN UNKNOWN ` then there are sadlly a few who will sing ` UFOs do not exist ` you bothched the investigation
Pages: <<  25    26    27    28    29  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 9 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 19 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags