Well if I had this amazing technology I would have used it in wars, but then again I'm not in the military so maybe they have good reasons not to do so. It just doesn't seem logical to me that these technologies have been hidden for decades, as this is not normal practice if I understand correctly.
The thing is we don't have anything here on earth that can match that performance that I know of today, let alone 20 years ago..
So covering up alien visitation could seem logical, covering up advanced secret tech for more than a few years does not.
I understand completely, if I hadn’t stumbled onto these videos on youtube I would be wondering the same. Basically Stan Deyo makes his point that until a global united government system is established, the technologies won’t be let out of the box.
(Do I believe what he says? – well it’s a theory that makes more sense then aliens)
Here some of it is transcribed –
You put yourself in the scientists position in the mid 50’s, what you see is that you’ve got a technology that if announced to the public would cause mass reactions in the economy in cultural reactions that could probably bring about the demise of the whole civilisation. A simple example would be this – as a scientist you come out in the mid 50’s and say we have a process which will allow us to get rid of tyres, allow us to get rid of the petrel engine, hence all the petrel, hence all the dependant industries. It will be available for you in 24 months time and will only cost you 3-4 thousand dollars. Now, what kind of person in their right mind would buy a new petrel engine car if you could have one of these new ones in 2 years that don’t need roads and run on electricity and no petrel necessary.
They’d all stop their buying trends that would then collapse the economies that would be building them in 24 months. If you had a central world authority, then you announced when you controlled all the nations and you announced we’ve got a new car that does this, nobody would panic because they know that if their industry become redundant they would be retrained and payed while they were doing it in some other supported industry.
We don’t have that sort of facility at the moment because we’re greatly disordered and many of the cultures fight against each other. Scientists, industrialists, engineers I guess found this problem in the mid 50’s. Now we’re playing their parts – we sit here and we say ‘how do we get world unity?’ The united nations, the league of nations had failed, you couldn’t get any 2 or 3 of them to turn the sovereignty over to a third party, you couldn’t come out and build an army from the united nations or the league of nations or even a corporate army and tell the people of earth you’re taking over, as some people have suggested that’s what the multinationals might do.
You can’t do that because mass resistance would be worse then the French resistance to Hitler, it would destroy the unity they were trying to get. So by peaceful discussion over the conference table and by force it wasn’t possible, yet as the scientific community looked at this new technology it reached into all human endeavour and touched many points of life, they said look, if we develop this, completely develop it into a social technological integrated model, away from the rest of people in islands or in backrooms, however we do it keep it quite even from the politicians. At some point latter after 1956-57, some point later we’ll have it ready to announce to the world as a global system. Then all we’ve got to do is figure out how to convince them to give it a try, a unity.
Scientists aren’t going to come out, industrialists aren’t going to come out and say ‘ ok here it is children, here you go, the new model for planet earth using this technology. It must be independent of any established government or order – it can’t be communists or capitalists, it has to be independent and the only way you can do it is an external culture. Whether it be from the ocean bottom or the Bermuda triangle or outer space, the public have got to see it in this way so that for a short time the masses will overlook their culture differences to unite to form this one world order. Then after 7 or 8 years you explain to them this is how we brought peace.
If you are not familiar with it let me know and I will post the links.
If you could please, thx.
and officially concluded they were not a direct threat to national security.
I remember watching a documentary where this was being said, so a thought: Could it be that because the technology we had back in the 40’s and 50’s was so primitive to what we have now, that what the government thought what were U.F.O’s unidentified flying objects – were really identified flying objects that they couldn’t identify at that the time because of the limits in technology?
Also, when observing photos of ufo’s spotted in the 50’s, you can’t but despair at the generally tacky design of the ufo’s that where photographed. You must agree with me at least on the similarities of the ufo’s in 50’s photos to the design of the technology that was being developed at the time?
The testemonies of credible wistleblowers also point in this direction (not counting the numerous charlatans).
And how exactly do you discern any difference between the two????? David Icke compared to the interviewees of the Camelot Project. They appear at least to me to hold the same level of credibility. Who in your mind holds more then others?
Yes I can see the disconect but then who or what is piloting these craft?
I haven’t the faintest clue but aliens of all assumptions just don’t seem right.
UFO sightings have been around long before we had aircraft ourselves.
Can you give me any examples – links maybe?
Unfortunately these reports can not be verified conclusively.
Exactly, and that’s no way to form an opinion based on such evidence.
Also the difference between the UFO/ET phenomenon and your example of god is that nobody ever tracked god on radar that I know of.
And we don’t know what it is we are traking on radar – so it’s best not to jump the alien conclusion straight away.
[edit on 6-1-2009 by andre18]
