Originally posted by Divas4Truth
This video explains what the twin pillars of Freemasonry really mean and the ways in which Freemasons go against the tenets of Christianity, while
claiming that one has to believe in a God to become a Freemason.
Please let me know your thoughts on it.
In the first 6 seconds I can already spot a fault. It says: One main tenet of Freemasonry is the twin pillars" This is wrong. The 3-tenets of
Freemasonry are: Brotherly Love, Relief, and Truth.
At 17 seconds, it says, "And they are clearly seen on the First Degree Masonic Tracing Board." First of all it's Trestle board, not tracing board.
Second, these particular are embedded in all the degrees of Freemasonry since Freemasonry has much to do with King Solomon's Temple. All pieces of
architecture and operative masonry corresponds with today's speculative Freemasonry.
At 25 seconds it shows a mural of 3-pillars, these are not the twin pillars, Jachin or Boaz. Honestly you can read about Jachin and Boaz in the
From 36 seconds to 54 seconds, that quote is laughable and this conspirator seems to have some pent up sexual thoughts.
At 1:07, this is written, "Columns, obelisks, standing stones, the stocks of trees, towers, & even crosses are representations of the virile
member". I laughed hard at this. I'd hate to see a penis that looks like a cross! OW! Same for the comment at 1:27.
At 1:44, the make of this film took an image too literal. Since many Masons are a follower of one of the Abrahamic religions, they believe what is
prescribed in their Holy Book.
At 2:31 the author makes a claim that Albert Pike said it was okay for man to worship the penis, but shows no evidence of it.
As a whole, the author of the video misinterpreted everything from rudimentary to Masonic images. I'd say a few more years in school would do them
better. As for the message, I am guessing the author thinks the Freemasons are just a big sex cult? if that is the case where is this sex taking
place? I'm the Worshipful Master damn it! Where's my sex?!
The video connected no dots, nor proved there were any dots in the first place to be connected. A 5th grader could have made a better presentation
and with facts. Ah, and as I see the video end, it is Divas4Truth is the author. Well, your credibility is shot in my eyes.
Please do some research next time so you don't embarrass yourself.
[edit on 4-1-2009 by KSigMason]