AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Board Business & Questions discussion forum.  (rss)


I want to be a grammar Nazi for a minute.


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 09:10 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by InfaRedMan
ATS needs more grammar Nazi's!


i agreez... den we can fillup more threds policing spellin rather den deallin wit da issue's

Gude ideaz


Und leaf mine smilies alone





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 09:20 PM by they see ALL


That's what happens when you don't pay people to run a site . Ouch, did I say that publicly? I'm just kidding, I love this place! Anyway, I hate grammatical and spelling errors in posts and the like. Get Firefox people! Firefox will, at least, help cure spelling ailments. ATS should hire me, as I'm now an English major .





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 04:22 AM by Majic


Achtung! Vorsicht!

Henceforth, forthwith and hither to yon, ATS Big Threads shall be moderated with greater stricticity.

That is all.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 09:29 AM by drevill


Hello

I love that "English" as written language is changing. funny also that it partly seems reflective of centuries past.

Anyone, in my opinion, that is hung up on correct grammar has to take a look inside themselves and ask a few questions as it is quite a personality marker.

as grammar and spelling changes the actual meaning changes little or at all. I think its great! I agree the internet (early chat rooms?) have prompted this but with a lot of muscle thrown in by mobile texters. i cant understand my mum at all when she texts me.

what with little emote icons (is that the right word) the written english is turning hieroglyphicesque (best check the dictionary in this word) . its fascinating to watch and be a part of

david



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 09:52 AM by _Volt_


Originally posted by Dermo
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Speaking realistically, grammar has been in the hole for years. Ever since the internet and that famous first LOL was sent. New-speak has changed mostly everything, and especially in the english language.


Its evolution of the new global language.

I'd rather talk in grunts.. it'd be easier to understand everyone and there would be no need for small talk.

ugg!


Ugg!! Ugg!! *bash* Ugg?! *runs away*



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 10:12 AM by Skyfloating


Stricter Moderation: Means Moderation will get stricter.

More Strict Moderation: Means that there will be more of the Moderation that is already strict.




   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 10:35 AM by Badge01


reply to post by Majic



Sorry, no. It's Stricticality you're looking for, Majic.

Stricticity = Google hits, zero

Stricticality = 33 hits.

I think the appropriate aphorism is 'Neener, neener'.

HTH.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 02:10 PM by Teratoma


Originally posted by drevill

Anyone, in my opinion, that is hung up on correct grammar has to take a look inside themselves and ask a few questions as it is quite a personality marker.


To be fair, if anyone was actually "hung up" on any of this we wouldn't be able to stand it here - or anywhere else on this here innerweb thingamajig. You sound like you're taking the "nazi" reference in the title literally. It should be obvious that we're "having a go" at ourselves while simultaneously venting frustration at an annoyance.

Some people are perfectionists, some don't give a *snip*, and most fall somewhere in between.

Of course I don't really think that anyone at ATS is lacking in the mental capacity to "mind their Ps & Qs".

as grammar and spelling changes the actual meaning changes little or at all.



This is debatable. Like I said, the natural progression of a language is a good thing, but not at the cost of expressiveness. New words make a language grow but when they're forced into the collective vocabulary due to short-lived trends then material produced during those times loses its longevity. It'll sound dated. Certain grammatical distinctions are in place for a reason, and are something that gives a language (and language in general) its power.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 09:11 PM by they see ALL


Well, language is spoken first and subsequently written down. Thus, language, one can say, is constantly evolving. We shouldn't, however, abandon fundamental grammatical rules. Now that's being a grammatical Nazi!





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 10:32 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by Majic
Achtung! Vorsicht!

Henceforth, forthwith and hither to yon, ATS Big Threads shall be moderated with greater stricticity.

That is all.


Ach du Lieber

Now THAT is Nazism pure and simple

Ve haf vays of making you post correctly, ja?



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 08:03 AM by majestictwo


Originally posted by asmeone2
Just curious,

Why do the ATS Big Threads say "Subject to more strict moderation" instead of "Subject to stricter moderation?"

[edit on 4-1-2009 by asmeone2]


or in the profile section

(I didn't update this yet.)

instead of

I haven’t updated this yet



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 09:06 AM by whatukno


Hey man, I live in Detroit, let me tell you compared to most of the people I talk to on a daily basis, ATS and what is written here is Shakespeare!

If a true grammar Nazi ever came to this city, I think their head would explode!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 12:38 PM by Heike


Oh, cool, a place to gripe about our grammatical pet peeves!

Mine is "I would of done that."

The correct phrase is "I would have done that," which can be abbreviated to "I would've done that," which I know SOUNDS like "I would of done that" when speaking. But it's not!

Thank you.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>






















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.055 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.