It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...
So far, I have agreed with most of Barnett’s arguments. She achieved her goal of clearly explaining water crisis to the public and that some way to fix it is by using technology to fix natural formations such as wetlands and by controlling water usage with inflation. Nonetheless, the latter itself is controversial, if the people pay more, then private corporations will only become richer which is exploitation and condemned by the public. Why should people give up more money to the bottling and utility companies already with billions in net worth? Should farmers pay more for irrigation as well? If they do not then why do “we” have to pay more? If they pay more for water then would not food prices spike throughout the world making first-world nations the only ones with food and water while the rest lack water AND food? The point is that Barnett did not introduce the possibility that the water crisis has been engineered by companies to earn even more profit. She seems to only cover the superficial government involvement with corporation to retain neutrality.
I learned a few new perspectives from the book, but nothing too dramatic. One thing developed nations must do is reduce irrigation for lawns and golf courses. Golf courses do not benefit the majority; golf is a way for rich people to waste time. As George Carlin would say, “Golf is like watching flies ****.” Lawns are to increase property value, but what if one does not want to spend the money or care too much about the environment? Then he/she will be fined; fined for petty disputes over property in a capitalist and free market society, hypocritical correct?
Another way to eliminate a large part of the water crisis internationally is by ultimately eliminating the for-profit privatization of water and those (The World Bank and Congress) responsible for its creation. Corporate control of water has been meddling with politics and water usage since technology allowed the control of water.
During my childhood in China and the recent visits, it can easily be seen that there is no “drinking” water; liquid, dirty or clean, is all I had access to. In water scarce and high population areas such as China and Haiti, there are not even enough un-bottled water to replace daily respiration. In industrializing nations, the only way to obtain “drinkable” water is expensively imported bottled beverages, whose Western based manufacturers intentionally/unintentionally caused the drought by draining all the regional water from the ground and surface to resale to the commoners without treatment and at unimaginable prices. Filtration systems are usually too expensive for average third-world citizens, a simple Brita pitcher is price gouged to cost about a quarter of their yearly salary.
In Beijing, a “foreigner” like me can actually taste and feel the texture of the chemicals and filth in the water from sinks; the last time I drank boiled water in Beijing, I was literally, physically unable to swallow the “water” because it felt like gravel at the back of my throat. However, these people have no choice, politicians are usually bribed into conceding to the corporations or are actual employees of the monopolies themselves. One question that can be asked is, do water-privatization sectors really want to fix the water problem which they could exploit without blame? We can see here that corporations are the real problem; they undetectably (to the average individual) promote water usage to further control water; and as Barnet said, water is the future oil and that whoever controls water controls the future.
During the five years of my life here in Florida, I have not seen any major coverage about water crises. To my amazement, I have not really even been concerned about water until after reading Mirage. The book is definitely a must read for all, especially the dim-witted politicians of the world whom we would expect to fully understand the water crisis but really do not.