If you search "squibs" many, many threads show up. Tell me how it could NOT have been caused by air pressure?

Too violent they are. And some are hapenning much lower in the building.
Also in the video you will see other controlled demolitions from the top down, or from the middle down, for comparation.

[edit on 4-1-2009 by pai mei]

Originally posted by Blueracer
If you search "squibs" many, many threads show up. Tell me how it could NOT have been caused by air pressure?

Just a wonder, but would 40 floors below the collapse be effected by air pressure?

No idea, I'm just curious.

It still looks nothing, not even remotely like a controlled demolition.

Look at building controlled demolitions; they look nothing like the WTC. The WTC collapse was a mess and very far from controlled looking.

As said above, the squibs were most likely caused by air pressure

Mikey

If it was from the air pressure then it must have been more frequent, not just 1 or 2 occasions, but hundreds or thousands of them as the area in which the "air pressure" was kept inside was immense, the air pressure compensation is not going to happen with 1 or 2 broken windows out of several thousands.

You're asking the wrong person. I am not a proclaimed expert on this subject. I want to know how it 100% cannot be.

[edit on 1/4/2009 by Blueracer]

Originally posted by Mikey84
It still looks nothing, not even remotely like a controlled demolition.

Look at building controlled demolitions; they look nothing like the WTC. The WTC collapse was a mess and very far from controlled looking.

As said above, the squibs were most likely caused by air pressure

Mikey

Perhaps you can show us what a controlled demo does look like. Because to me and the main percentage of every other reader in the 911 threads it looks exactly like a controlled demo. The squibs are literally one of the many smoking guns.

One day you'll realize you have been hoodwinked by your beloved leaders you love, revere and trust so well Mikey84.

wZn

Ok, I don’t normally post on 911, but I need to know this. From what I’ve read it was an inside job to create terror and panic right?

So why in god’s name would they do a controlled demolition to cause less damage?

That doesn’t make sense. If it was an inside job the point would be to cause as much panic as possible, not contain the collapses.

Originally posted by Blueracer
If you search "squibs" many, many threads show up. Tell me how it could NOT have been caused by air pressure?

I'm assuming you understand how air pressure works. To accumulate enough pressure to be that destructive (like the "squibs" seen), where are you going to collect the air? Because it has to be an air-tight container. If there are leaks to the atmosphere where the air can decompress, like broken windows, or missing pieces of wall, or, say, the entire building being blown into small pieces floor-by-floor, then the air is simply going to escape before major pressure develops.

There were shafts going through each floor to channel air in the building. They were all within the core. So when you have squibs that are, for example, 50 stories below the collapse wave, how is there air getting that far down the building, without decompressing? How does all that pressure get from the core, to the exterior columns, still in the shape of a narrow enough current to cause the destruction seen? Pockets of extreme air pressure would have to move like a bullet like something out of Looney Toons.

There is too much that would not make sense if these were caused by air pressure. Busted water pipes is more believable to me but even that is not very believable.

Originally posted by bsbray11

Originally posted by Blueracer
If you search "squibs" many, many threads show up. Tell me how it could NOT have been caused by air pressure?

I'm assuming you understand how air pressure works. To accumulate enough pressure to be that destructive (like the "squibs" seen), where are you going to collect the air? Because it has to be an air-tight container. If there are leaks to the atmosphere where the air can decompress, like broken windows, or missing pieces of wall, or, say, the entire building being blown into small pieces floor-by-floor, then the air is simply going to escape before major pressure develops.

There were shafts going through each floor to channel air in the building. They were all within the core. So when you have squibs that are, for example, 50 stories below the collapse wave, how is there air getting that far down the building, without decompressing? How does all that pressure get from the core, to the exterior columns, still in the shape of a narrow enough current to cause the destruction seen? Pockets of extreme air pressure would have to move like a bullet like something out of Looney Toons.

There is too much that would not make sense if these were caused by air pressure. Busted water pipes is more believable to me but even that is not very believable.

Just a quick question could these squibs be caused by natural gas explosions?

Just thought would it be possible assuming they used natural gas in the building for heating (which I have no idea if they did or not) for that to ignite in such a way to go down the building from the top causing these squibs?

Maybe they used all electric I don't know but the thought just occurred to me.

[edit on 5-1-2009 by Darthorious]

Originally posted by Darthorious
Just a quick question could these squibs be caused by natural gas explosions?

If you mean the ones that stick out individually all over the place, I don't really know. But I would say "no" anyway, because I have also seen these things come out, row by row by row, or semi-spiraling around the buildings, at the collapse waves (they WERE the "collapse wave"). So all that stuff flying out floor-by-floor, really looks like these "squibs," if you can see past/through all the flying dust clouds and other debris. It's easiest to see near the beginning of the collapse and from the ground level. So that would have to be a LOT of gas explosions, enough to consider a significant part of the collapse if you ask me.

I don't know if they used natural gas or not. Someone more familiar with building codes probably has a better idea. I'm sure there would be plenty of safety regulations either way.