|
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 05:52 AM by tac109
|
I wonder when the british people will grow a set and start a revolution in their country. Man o man they just bend over every time their government
tries something new. Its no wonder the queen took all their firearms.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 07:06 AM by PuterMan
|
Originally posted by BlackKnight7365
hehe they would hate mine lol first one needs to get through the multiple firewall and then figure out which sys on the network is the working one lol
. that is if they can trace my ip lol.
No problem to trace your IP, including the one behind any NAT router. Take a look at this site. You might be surprised.
www.auditmypc.com...
[edit on 5-1-2009 by PuterMan]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 07:56 AM by Frankidealist35
|
I'm sorry if I sound off topic but may I ask what the hell happened in Europe? I used to envy you guys because you had leaders that were more caring
of civil rights and leaders who made less arrogant decisions. I can't honestly believe that you're letting your governments do this to you. How
can you stand for this? Here in the USA the Bush administration only looks at emails and phone calls, but, you're going to be letting your
governments go one step further and looking at your personal stuff. I used to think Europe was cool. Now it's becoming too like the future that
Orwellian imagined.
I am outraged as to why you're just sitting there and just taking it. Do you let your governments do whatever they want to you? Why don't you just
let them walk in your home and take your stuff and inspect your personal belongings?
[edit on 5-1-2009 by Frankidealist35]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 08:08 AM by Exuberant1
|
reply to post by Frankidealist35
"Here in the USA the Bush administration only looks at emails and phone calls, but, you're going to be letting your governments go one step further
and looking at your personal stuff"
*I can't honestly believe that you are letting your government do this to you. How can you stand for this?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 08:13 AM by Frankidealist35
|
reply to post by Exuberant1
We don't stand for it. You should see the crowd of anti-Bush people we have here in the USA complaining about Bush's programs that infringe on our
national security. But the administration does nothing about it. The difference here is that it's just an administration thing really. Over there
in your place in Europe you let all the European governments do it so now they can spy on you whenever they want to. I feel sorry for you guys since
you let your governments stoop to the same level that our government did.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 08:27 AM by sty
|
I found this interesting program (open source, free):
www.truecrypt.org...
Main Features:
Creates a virtual encrypted disk within a file and mounts it as a real disk.
Encrypts an entire partition or storage device such as USB flash drive or hard drive.
Encrypts a partition or drive where Windows is installed (pre-boot authentication).
Encryption is automatic, real-time (on-the-fly) and transparent.
Provides two levels of plausible deniability, in case an adversary forces you to reveal the password:
1) Hidden volume (steganography) and hidden operating system.
2) No TrueCrypt volume can be identified (volumes cannot be distinguished from random data).
Encryption algorithms: AES-256, Serpent, and Twofish. Mode of operation: XTS.
I guess this can help..
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 08:38 AM by george_gaz
|
Wow, I am honestly gobsmacked. I cannot believe that the Home Office would do this. I believe that the UK is already the most surveyed country with
all of the CCTV etc but this is taking it a gigantic leap further.
I am sure that they will spin it as a counter-terrorist measure or a way to capture images of a pedophile nature but it will soon be reaching the far
corners of the Isles and infecting all of our machines.
Shocking
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 09:09 AM by Teknikal
|
Unless vista which I never plan to use anyway has a back-door built in I honestly can't see the police being able to hack anyone this seems to me
like something some bureaucrat has dreamt up.
Just in case though there are a couple of common sense but probably effective measures you can take and I would be a little surprised if most people
didn't do some of them already.
1 Turn your wifi router not to broadcast a SSID if they can't see you they probably won't try to hack you.
It would also be in your best interests to use at least WPA encryption, block all unneeded ports and only allow your own PCs mac addresses to
connect.
You could also use an open source firmware if your router supports it and your paranoid enough
2 Never open any email attachments from unknown sources and even be wary of known sources as email has always been incredibly easy to fake.
I guess it depends how they go about it really if they need physical access or have the ISP snoop I wouldn't personally class that as hacking and it
isn't very hard to check your keyboard once in a while or install TOR.
I have to say I find this whole thing very unlikely to be honest at least in real world usage.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 09:33 AM by JH80
|
Wireless networks will always be vulnerable. Preventing your router from broadcasting your network's SSID can help, but only to a certain degree.
There are numerous computer programs which will still detect 'invisible' networks.
With regards to the thread title, I find it totally unacceptable. If someone is suspected of committing 'cyber crime', fair enough - hack in. If
necessary, confiscate their computer. "Routine" searches, however, without justification, are an invasion of our privacy.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 09:36 AM by Frankidealist35
|
reply to post by JH80
You guys in the UK need your own version of the 4th amendment. Your government really dislikes your civil liberties and wants to get rid of of
whatever privacy you have right.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 10:15 AM by ipsedixit
|
Not long ago in Toronto there was a conviction related to child pornography that was connected to the use of Limewire (the file trading
application).
I thought at the time, reading about the case in the paper, that it was unusual in the sense that the criminal was apprehended, not on the basis of
his web surfing habits, where he might have stumbled into an online sting operation being conducted by the police, but instead, by what strikes me as
a greater degree of intrusion into what is going on with this person's computer.
It was never actually stated in the newspaper article just how this person was apprehended.
Limewire is a peculiar type of client in that it can take files or parts of files from numerous servers.
That fact made me wonder if simply running Limewire itself, might be enough probable cause for a judge to issue a warrant or for police to go ahead
and do a cyber reconnaisance without a warrant.
I told myself years ago just to assume that when I am online, that I am under surveillance, but still the idea of widespread police surveillance of my
computer use annoys me. Why? Just look at the history of your local police department. Have they ever had crooks, thugs, shysters, con men, perverts,
weasels, blackmailers, etc. on your police force? I know they have on mine. It only takes one.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 10:41 AM by songthrush
|
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
reply to post by JH80
You guys in the UK need your own version of the 4th amendment. Your government really dislikes your civil liberties and wants to get rid of of
whatever privacy you have right.
This is true. I see trouble over this and it will arrive in a flash, completely unplanned. More and more people are realising 'all that Alex Jones
stuff' is coming true, right before their eyes...
The Convention on Modern Liberty, Feb 28 2009
www.modernliberty.net...
We Brits need to attend this, to finally get off our fat rears and speak up, then maybe we mosey on over to Downing Street and voice our displeasure
AS WE HAVE A RIGHT TO DESPITE OFICER JACKBOOT AND HIS MP5 .
C'mon you armchair heroes, who is going?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 12:51 PM by Drexl
|
I don't know if it would help me any , but because I have a few pc's and laptops , all the data I ever download is put onto these external hard
drives ( they are the size of fat books , those ones ) and only applications as such sit on the actual internal drives . I suppose download history
etc would be held on an internal drive thou . But if they come for me , I'd pull the external drive out and hide it when they are banging at the door
. It's not like they'll say where's the external drive gone, they'll just take the pc.
If they do ask where these missing drives are at , I'll say they are USB flashdrives and lob a few of those at them to investigate .
When they kick at your front door
How you gonna come?
With your hands on your external hard drive
Or on the trigger of your gun
When the law break in
How you gonna go?
Shot down on the pavement
Or waiting on death row
edit : PS I use this program 'truecrypt' for data on the external drives, is this good enough encryption ? It is not like I have anything at the
moment that would be deemed illegal, but you know the way things are going .. orwellian and thought crime orientated , won't be long before it's a
crime to hold opinions or information contrary to the state propaganda.
I suppose this too is also relevant :
Page last updated at 16:32 GMT, Wednesday, 31 December 2008
A private company could be asked to run a huge database containing details of all telephone calls, emails and internet use, it has been reported.
The option to tender out the management of the database will be included in a consultation paper to be published next month, according to the
Guardian.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said access to such data was key to fighting terrorism but with proper safeguards.
Critics have said the idea poses a serious threat to civil liberties.
Former director of public prosecutions Sir Ken Macdonald reiterated his opposition to the plan in light of the Guardian's report, dismissing official
claims that additional legal assurances would ensure the information is not misused.
He told the paper: "All history tells us that reassurances like these are worthless in the long run. In the first security crisis the locks would
loosen."
The database, which critics claim would cost up to £12bn, is not intended to record the content of communications, but only the details of internet
sites visited and what emails and telephone calls have been made, to whom and at what times.
news.bbc.co.uk...
I think this woman Jacqui Smith is behind a lot of this , there is something suspect and unpleasant about her .
[edit on 5-1-2009 by Drexl]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 01:58 PM by solidshot
|
Originally posted by Drexl
I think this woman Jacqui Smith is behind a lot of this , there is something suspect and unpleasant about her .
[edit on 5-1-2009 by Drexl]
It isn't only Jackie Smith, it's the whole Nu Labour project that since it's inception has been doing every thing in it's power to destroy every
thing this country ever stood for and watering down the British population with ever increasing numbers of immigrants so that when the time comes for
them to force us further into Europe and remove Parliament/ give what little powers we have left to our European masters there will be no fight left
in our people and nobody will stand in the way.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 03:09 PM by buldog87
|
Its only fair they get to hack in to home user pc's, when you consider home users hack them hourly
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 03:15 PM by solidshot
|
It looks like our master have been keeping an eye on what the great unwashed have been doing for sometime.
UK police already do a "small number" of such operations under existing law.
BBC
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 03:33 PM by ArMaP
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 03:47 PM by ArMaP
|
reply to post by Anonymous ATS
Avast is Czech, Avira is German, AVG is Czech, BitDefender is Romanian, F-Prot is Icelandic, F-Secure is Finnish, NOD32 is Slovak, Panda is Spanish,
etc.
And if I were you I would be more worried with "Big Company" than with "Big Brother". You probably are not aware how relatively easy it is for a
company such as Google, with all those ADs on all those sites, to build a perfect map of where you have been today.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 05:08 PM by MrAnonUK
|
Originally posted by tac109
I wonder when the british people will grow a set and start a revolution in their country. Man o man they just bend over every time their government
tries something new. Its no wonder the queen took all their firearms.
We don't want firearms, and that is rich coming from somebody in a nation that accuses one another of being unpatriotic if you mention 9-11 in the
wrong vein. 'Man o man' you really need to reflect before commenting on other peoples homelands, you really do not have a leg to stand on.
Actually, that was pretty hilarious considering what side of the pond the submission is coming from.
Grow a brain.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |