Argggg... Yes, the piece is biased. It is biased toward the creation of Zionism and it's founding principals - the purpose of the thread. Notice
how I stopped explaining the history around 1948, about the same time Israel became a nation!? I was trying to give the perspective of where this
thing started and why - not to slam the Jewish people or anything like that.
I will state again, from the point that Israel was formed, BOTH sides of the equation have committed atrocious acts against the other. Sadly, our
history lessons only seem to start at the end of WWII when it comes to Israel and that gives a very biased view in and of itself. There is
perspective here. There is greater understanding to be gained from having thte knowledge of where this started.
This is not something that just happened. It has evolved over time and there was a starting point. I have attempted to illustrate that starting
point by demonstrating how Zionists are different from Jews and what their political objectives were from the beginning.
So, yes, there is bias... warranted bias based on the topic being discussed.



Kozmo, From what I understand, the Zionists approached the British leadership about a year after the Lusitania was sunk and offered them a
proposition. The British were getting their butts kicked by the Germans at that time and were running out of food too. The Germans had cut off their
supply ships.