*new presentation* Over The Navy Annex featuring Terry Morin, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 10:16 AM by CameronFox
reply to post by SPreston



Spreston... yes YOU WIN!!

Your graphics are not accurate are they? Check em again!

We are going by what he saw. He did not ever say that he lost sight of the plane over the Annex... he lost sight behind some trees.


reply posted on 5-1-2009 @ 10:51 AM by SPreston
posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to
post by CameronFox



You are not being civil and you are not staying on topic.

This thread is not about what side of the citgo station the plane flew nor is it about the Pentagon flyover.

It is about whether or not the plane flew over the navy annex.

It appears as though you agree with Morin on this point so thank you for admitting that 9/11 was an inside job.

Have a great day.


Is CameronFox on our side now?

Nah. I think he is still dragging his feet.

Give him another week until the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY sinks completely into the quicksand its foundations were built upon.


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:52 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



If the plane was ONA it fatally contradicts all official reports, data, and physical damage proving the plane did not hit the Pentagon.

Since it proves the 9/11 official narrative false there is no question that such a complex black operation couldn't have been pulled off without involvement of those with access to and control of the resources of U.S. military and intelligence.

It has nothing to do with the Navy specifically or any of our armed forces.

It was a psychological black operation of mass murder as a strategic pretext for permanent global war.


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 01:29 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by adam_zapple



Since it proves the 9/11 official narrative false there is no question that such a complex black operation couldn't have been pulled off without involvement of those with access to and control of the resources of U.S. military and intelligence.

I really don't know how I can be any more clear.

It was a covert black operation.

Illegal war crimes happen all the time throughout the world but this one happened here and was on such a massive scale that it could not have happened without military resources.


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 03:00 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by adam_zapple



Easily.

The people in control of the military utilized its resources illegally and covertly without using the troops.


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 03:15 PM by adam_zapple
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to
post by adam_zapple



Easily.

The people in control of the military utilized its resources illegally and covertly without using the troops.


A military deception with no troops?
Without troops to operate planes, weapons, etc....what resources did they have?

Who, specifically, are these "people in control"?

What evidence do you have of the involvement or actions of these individuals?


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 03:29 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by adam_zapple



Yes the operation could have been accomplished without any troops.

For the necessary human resources they would have most likely utilized mercenaries, double-agents, or operatives without any sworn commitments to the USA since of course participating in such a war crime would be high treason.

I'll admit you are forcing me into the realm of speculation as it's also possible that some troops were used as well.

However the independent evidence I provide simply proves the official narrative false.

The OP of this thread and many others that I have posted here addresses this evidence. Feel free to search them or visit our website where it is all compiled, cataloged, and presented for you to view in full at no cost.

www.thepentacon.com...

I don't claim to know exactly who was involved with physically executing the attack.

I only claim to have evidence proving the official narrative false.

But I also strongly believe that the operation could not have been completed without the resources of U.S. military and intelligence.

If you feel this is a leap of logic fair enough, we will have to agree to disagree on that point.

Moving forward if you wish to continue participating in this thread I respectfully request that you stick to the evidence presented in the OP as the rules of this forum require.

Thanks.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags