Originally posted by Byrd
Actually, everyone knew this at the time. This wasn't a real revelation.
Many people know it's going on today as well. But if someone was going up against it, in the public eye and was murdered and such for it, then
obviously there is conspiracy in it.
So while that fact in itself was no large revelation, it is a large revelation when one figures it out. But it is entirely different in what Jesus
did because he not only had this revelation, he went against it. If the revelation is no big deal, then where are the other stories of people
going against it like this?
I'll use Ron Paul for example. Goes up against the fed all the time. There is a big difference in those of us who know the truth, and him who goes
up against it and has for decades. If he was killed for it, then is that not a conspiracy?
Thus, his death is the conspiracy of someone going against the conspiracy.
Of course, this is only a small portion of what he did. He spoke other truths beyond just that of pointing out the problem that you say is no
revelation. He cut straight to the core roots of the problems - people's misguided beliefs. He undermined all of man's authority. And that is
the real reason for the murder. Thus why it is different than someone who just pointed it out, he actually showed people a better way.
Aren't you the same moderator who moved the only topic I made on these forums that pointed out that those who use heavy symbolisms are the ones who
are wolves in sheeps clothing - aka part of the conspiracy, and then told me that the topic had nothing to do with conspiracy?
Why are you even allowed to moderate in a forum like this when you have these kinds of opinions? Is this forum only designed so that religion is the
conspiracy, rather than conspiracy in religions? How can you moderate a conspiracy theory forum when you don't even know what the conspiracies are,
and then decide what is what?

to ATS on this one.
[edit on 3-1-2009 by badmedia]