It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amuk
I hate to back Bush on anything but you got to admit if he was trying to use Iraq as a lightining rod to draw terrorists and other enemies into a area to fight a more or less pitched war on SOMEONE ELSES real estate he is not doing a bad job of it.
I was against the war to begin with and wished we had not invaded Iraq, but since we are already here That is the stratgy I would use at this point.
[Edited on 7-4-2004 by Amuk]
Originally posted by Amuk
I hate to back Bush on anything but you got to admit if he was trying to use Iraq as a lightining rod to draw terrorists and other enemies into a area to fight a more or less pitched war on SOMEONE ELSES real estate he is not doing a bad job of it.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
It's nice to see a liberal admit that Bush may be doing something right
Originally posted by J0HNSmith
Originally posted by Amuk
I hate to back Bush on anything but you got to admit if he was trying to use Iraq as a lightining rod to draw terrorists and other enemies into a area to fight a more or less pitched war on SOMEONE ELSES real estate he is not doing a bad job of it.
no no no you don't understand. He has created more terrorists with his actions, not drawn them into the area. Although there are a few Al Queda in the area the overwhelming amount of new terrorists are a direct result of Bushes actions.
Originally posted by dreamrebel
Amuk dude. I am getting my battle axe out and going over to support my clan when they charge the rival stronghold of Fallujah.. I look over and see my oldest son throwing two grenades through a window as a man in with a dark beard aims his AK 47 at my youngest. As he beads down the on him, I throw my axe and crush his skull!
Originally posted by Amuk
I hate to back Bush on anything but you got to admit if he was trying to use Iraq as a lightining rod to draw terrorists and other enemies into a area to fight a more or less pitched war on SOMEONE ELSES real estate he is not doing a bad job of it.
I was against the war to begin with and wished we had not invaded Iraq, but since we are already here That is the stratgy I would use at this point.
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
Originally posted by Amuk
I hate to back Bush on anything but you got to admit if he was trying to use Iraq as a lightining rod to draw terrorists and other enemies into a area to fight a more or less pitched war on SOMEONE ELSES real estate he is not doing a bad job of it.
I was against the war to begin with and wished we had not invaded Iraq, but since we are already here That is the stratgy I would use at this point.
Just now figuring this out? It's simple really. Do we want to fight them here or over there? Over there is better. They are used to it.
Originally posted by Ambient Sound
A Leader doesn't have to be smart as long as he listens to smart people. I've always thought Dick Chaney was running that show anyway.
Originally posted by Amuk
I hate to back Bush on anything but you got to admit if he was trying to use Iraq as a lightining rod to draw terrorists and other enemies into a area to fight a more or less pitched war on SOMEONE ELSES real estate he is not doing a bad job of it.
I was against the war to begin with and wished we had not invaded Iraq, but since we are already here That is the stratgy I would use at this point.
Originally posted by junglejake
Wow, different take I hadn't even thought of. That's a remarkably good idea, if that's what we're doing. And just because you don't think Bush was smart enough to come up with the idea, Slayer, doesn't mean someone on his administration couldn't!
Originally posted by Amuk
Originally posted by American Mad Man
It's nice to see a liberal admit that Bush may be doing something right
A liberal?
You got to be kidding.
That's the thing about being a Libertarian The Reps call you a lib and the dems call you a con.
How many Liberals are for no gun laws, no taxes, no welfare, etc?
Originally posted by Satyr
Originally posted by Amuk
Originally posted by American Mad Man
It's nice to see a liberal admit that Bush may be doing something right
A liberal?
You got to be kidding.
That's the thing about being a Libertarian The Reps call you a lib and the dems call you a con.
How many Liberals are for no gun laws, no taxes, no welfare, etc?
All "conservatives" throw that word around as if they have no unearthly idea what it even means. Anyone who doesn't agree with them completely, is a "Liberal".
[Edited on 4-7-2004 by Satyr]