Originally posted by dooper
Hey, if your terrorists wear silver-thread short pants, turpentine rags around their ankles, shave their heads, and wear purple hats, then by God,
it's common sense that you keep an eye on everyone who wears silver-thread short pants, wraps turpentine rags around their ankles, shaves their
heads, and wears purple hats.
So as long as people wear military uniforms ( American, Israeli, etc) and act on the orders of western governments , or western puppets, we can sit
next to them as long as they have not branded us terrorist?
You don't think Palestinian suicide bombers would rather fly nice F-16
s and other fighter bombers to blow up their targets? Any chance your going to help fund such planes so they too can become deserving of your
'respect'?
Probably staged to enable a lawsuit anyway.
So your a paranoid capitalist? Figures...
Or, just good, common sense.
Common sense and support of state terrorism over individual terrorism hardly goes hand in hand.
Originally posted by dooper
Well, let's see. I didn't see Christians flying planes into buildings.
No, the Christians or Jewish people drop bombs and call it 'wars in the interest of creating 'stable democracies'. Obviously the terrorist just
blow things up because they are strangely not motivated by typical human driving forces such as 'independence', 'security'. Basically Christians
and Jewish 'reasons' for causing deaths are almost always believed while Muslims are never allowed to even suggest that they have reasons. God
forbid people may discover that they too employ reasoning before killing themselves or others! God forbid they may look human!
I didn't see Sikhs flying planes into buildings.
Nor Wiccans, nor Taoists,Muslims.
It has not been proved that Muslims piloted the planes or planned the attacks of 9-11. Obviously you can't consider or believe that so can i at least
offer up the fact that there where no Palestinians or Iraqi's on the planes? Would you stand for Russia attacking bombing and or invading the US
because they happen to believe that some French Christians were responsible for staging terrorist attacks on Russia? Any chance you can see how
illogical all of this is?
So who would I look to and be naturally suspicious?
To those you have been propagandized to be suspicious of naturally. Well done for being such a typical puppet.
This isn't all that hard to understand.
Who was the male adult in the Belway sniper team.
Oh. That's right John Muhammed.
Yup, it makes perfect sense to attack foreign nations because of domestic terrorism. I mean i stopped sitting next to Christians after the Timothy
McVeigh affair; just can't trust that mass/church going fanatics.
But don't anyone worry about Muslims. They are a peaceful religion.
I don't know of a peaceful monotheistic religion but and i don't know if that says something about monotheism or about my knowledge of such
religions.

What i just don't see is how Islam is a more violent religion than Christianity when the modern ( or ancient, Christianity became the
state religion of Imperial Rome) imperial powers who laid waste to much of world where all Christian.
Then again i think this is about politics and power with religions merely being employed to further the same old imperial ends.
Until you turn on the TV or read the papers.
And depending on where you live the state religion/media will paint you a nice picture of how a terrorist looks. The difference seems to be that it's
almost exclusively Christian pilots dropping bombs on Islamic states or broadcasters.
If you can make Christians seem to be the victims in all of this you are truly a artist of note and i look forward to observing your mental gyrations.
Stellar