More Chemtrails Over Chattanooga, Tn- 56k beware, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 04:01 PM by OzWeatherman
Its nice that you put the weather conditions at the surface, but you should really put the upper air weather conditions

Here's the latest radiosonde (weather balloon) sounding from Nahsville (closest upper air station to you).

weather.uwyo.edu...

weather.uwyo.edu...

The conditions described in the wetaher data from the weather balloon perfectly describe the conditions needed for persistant contrail development. I can guarantee the 58 (and greater) knot winds will have something to do with the spreading out of the trails


reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 04:04 PM by defcon5
Congrats you've located some Jet Routes...
VOR's


Originally posted by edgecrusher2199
As of 4:15
Sunny w/ chemtrails lol, 50*, 15mph winds, Humidity 25%, Dew Point 15*, visibility 9 miles

Sure....
Whats the conditions at each altitude level?


reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 04:13 PM by defcon5
reply to post by interestedalways



As many have explained to you multiple times, its not just the increase in the number of flights, but also the difference in engine types following the airlines changeover from 727's to the more fuel efficient 737's. The newer engines produce contrails under a wider set of conditions then the old ones did.



reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 04:51 PM by defcon5
Originally posted by interestedalways
Why do I bother???

Yes, I have noticed the changes in the explanations as the old explanations no longer work based on other members with knowledge.


I have explained the same thing on this site since I first started here in 2004, I dont know where you get that I have changed anything.

Here from a quick search:

2006:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by defcon5
Ill tell you what you'll find about aircraft, that most airlines flew B727's as their mainstay aircraft for a long time, and now are going to more fuel efficient types of aircraft. The main difference there is that the diameter on a 727 engine was about 4 feet, and those three engines where tightly packed on the tail. Now its all 737's, 757's, airbuses and the like, they all have much larger diameter engines that run more fuel efficiently and have larger intake fans. They are also almost all now lower-wing and separated by at least 30 or so feet, depending on the aircraft.


2007:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by defcon5
As to the volume, first I want you to look at these photos:






If you notice the engines, they are all roughly the same small diameter on these aircraft. I believe that several of them used the exact same engine type. Either way, the common factors on these aircraft are 1) Small fan to engine diameter, and 2) they were the most numerous aircraft in the sky before the late 80’s. In the 90’s, we started to see the 727’s being retired and replaced with much more efficient aircraft families. Watch what happens to the engines sizes when this change takes place:







So as the fan in these engines has increased in size, so has the amount of air exposed to the heat of the running engine:

www.boeing.com/companyoffices/aboutus/wonder_of_flight/engine.htm



These are just two I quickly found dating back years ago, I am sure you can find even more if you care to do a search under “chemtrail defcon5 727”: ATS Search

Kind of puts a dent in your theory, and your supposed “experts” (more like BS artists from sites like carnicom) inside information having altered any real knowledge or truth I have shared, doesn't it?


[edit on 1/1/2009 by defcon5]


reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 05:55 PM by defcon5
Originally posted by interestedalways
Excuse me, but I don't recall having posed a theory, would you like to tell me about my theory because at this point I haven't one.

Your theory that we have altered explanations because “chemtrail experts” have forced us to do so. My explanations have been pretty well the same since I started engaging in the Chemtrail debate, and are based on my years of working in the airline industry. The only person who ever even came close to disputing any of my information was the Chemist expert (who I suspect was really from carnicom or some other chemtrail site), who was using debate tactics to try and control the conversation. I finally gave up debating with him because it became pointless as he wanted to alter reality to fit his theories (wanted to say that it was possible to have stuff in the fuel, but avoided explaining any of the other Chemtrail related phenomenon (eg...patterns in skies, the diffusing into clouds, trails starting and stopping, etc)). You all constantly accuse me and other members as being paid debunkers, and he might have been the first actual one that I have ever encountered on ATS.

Originally posted by interestedalways
As I have said many times I have more questions than answers and don't except all the baby food I am being force fed by the wolf packs around here.

What baby food? Here on ATS you have some very knowledgeable people from various backgrounds who have told you the truth in relation to their fields of expertise, yet you simply refuse to hear them. Besides the sheer logistics of such an undertaking, the second best explanation as to why this is not happening is because aviation is very much based on visibility, and the FAA is certainly not going to allow anyone to intentionally cause a visibility hazard to run some ludicrous experiment in our sky everyday. Yes, planes can fly IFR, but not all pilots fly on the ATC system and depend on visibility to watch for traffic and other hazards.

As I have said over the years the best cure for Chemtrailmania is to educate yourself about aviation. You choose to ignore those with that education in light of what you think you see in the sky.

Originally posted by interestedalways
And for the record, Carnicom isn't where I get my information, I have spent many hours reading many different PDF's and exploring other information.

Carnicom is just the site I like to pick on the most, because it is the one most quoted on ATS. There are others and what I say applies to them all. You cannot trust sites like that, which are put up by a private individual and sell things about their topic, including advertising based on web hits. They have a conflict of interest in that if their pet theory dies, so does their source of income.

Originally posted by interestedalways
As a matter of fact one of my favorite ideas is one expressed by Beachcoma where he stated that the exhaust can't escape the atmosphere hence the lingering of the "cirrus" looking cloud cover.

Beachcoma, if I recall correctly was very anti-chemtrail.

Originally posted by interestedalways
I still don't own that theory, either. I am a seeker you see, I explore and don't stop at every potential explanation.

If that is the case then why do you open your first post with the remark that “it doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell something is amiss”. The implication being that those of us who have inside knowledge in related fields are idiots because we don't see this supposed thing that you do, and what we do see is normal.

Originally posted by interestedalways
And you can pull up that old post I made about the Morgellens like you did before to discredit me if that is all you have in your arsenal, but not to worry, I did post something stupid, but I moved past those thoughts and regrounded myself so a few bad posts don't define me.

I don't recall what you posted, there, and it certainly was not to discredit you other then to show why you have such a deep seated belief in the topic. Those trying to find an explanation for a disease are often the hardest to convinces of truth because they tend to self diagnose things based on their own knowledge and perception (which is more often then not incorrect). I know this from first hand experience in the medical field, and I see it on a daily basis.

spelling edit

[edit on 1/1/2009 by defcon5]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 17 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 15 days ago with 37 member flags
A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 109 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 11 hours ago, 94 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 13 hours ago, 50 replies