It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by interestedalways
Why do I bother???
Yes, I have noticed the changes in the explanations as the old explanations no longer work based on other members with knowledge.
Originally posted by defcon5
Ill tell you what you'll find about aircraft, that most airlines flew B727's as their mainstay aircraft for a long time, and now are going to more fuel efficient types of aircraft. The main difference there is that the diameter on a 727 engine was about 4 feet, and those three engines where tightly packed on the tail. Now its all 737's, 757's, airbuses and the like, they all have much larger diameter engines that run more fuel efficiently and have larger intake fans. They are also almost all now lower-wing and separated by at least 30 or so feet, depending on the aircraft.
Originally posted by defcon5
As to the volume, first I want you to look at these photos:
If you notice the engines, they are all roughly the same small diameter on these aircraft. I believe that several of them used the exact same engine type. Either way, the common factors on these aircraft are 1) Small fan to engine diameter, and 2) they were the most numerous aircraft in the sky before the late 80’s. In the 90’s, we started to see the 727’s being retired and replaced with much more efficient aircraft families. Watch what happens to the engines sizes when this change takes place:
So as the fan in these engines has increased in size, so has the amount of air exposed to the heat of the running engine:
www.boeing.com/companyoffices/aboutus/wonder_of_flight/engine.htm
Originally posted by sensfan
No matter what evidence is shown that these are just regular contrails is always ignored, but they stick to the idea that it's some sort of poison being sprayed.
Originally posted by defcon5
Kind of puts a dent in your theory, and your supposed “experts” (more like BS artists from sites like carnicom) inside information having altered any real knowledge or truth I have shared, doesn't it?
Originally posted by interestedalways
Excuse me, but I don't recall having posed a theory, would you like to tell me about my theory because at this point I haven't one.
Originally posted by interestedalways
As I have said many times I have more questions than answers and don't except all the baby food I am being force fed by the wolf packs around here.
Originally posted by interestedalways
And for the record, Carnicom isn't where I get my information, I have spent many hours reading many different PDF's and exploring other information.
Originally posted by interestedalways
As a matter of fact one of my favorite ideas is one expressed by Beachcoma where he stated that the exhaust can't escape the atmosphere hence the lingering of the "cirrus" looking cloud cover.
Originally posted by interestedalways
I still don't own that theory, either. I am a seeker you see, I explore and don't stop at every potential explanation.
Originally posted by interestedalways
And you can pull up that old post I made about the Morgellens like you did before to discredit me if that is all you have in your arsenal, but not to worry, I did post something stupid, but I moved past those thoughts and regrounded myself so a few bad posts don't define me.
Originally posted by interestedalways
Originally posted by sensfan
No matter what evidence is shown that these are just regular contrails is always ignored, but they stick to the idea that it's some sort of poison being sprayed.
This is part of the problem, people who question the sky being covered in unnatural clouds are all lumped together as believers in poison being sprayed.
This isn't my hypothisis, but I will continue to question the existance of what is going on above my head in my sky!