It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by n1zzzn
I think it would be very rash and very detremental to one's self to act upon anti-Muslim feelings or those that could be derived from this thread (which just screams weak minded).
There doesn't seem to be a direct emphasis on discrediting or attacking Islam, the thread topic seems to have held true to the orignal hypothesis of Islam relating to Revelations.
To discredit the idea by attacking the topic as Anti-Muslim or the like doesn't really seem credibile.
And to refute something I saw earlier regarding the Bible and authenticity, you say it cannot be proven true based it may have been edited.
I offer you this in direct relation to the comment: you can't prove it false either.
Originally posted by arcnaver
Islam and other submissive religions will say, "We should get along, after all, its the same god we worship!"
No its not! They are worshiping the Moon God, Satan. BIG Difference their.
Want proof, look it up yourselves for a chance, thats the only way you will be convinced anyways.
Originally posted by antonia
These "takes" seem to come from a deep-rooted fear of Islamic people.
Originally posted by antonia
And to create an entire thread extrapolating on the idea Muslims are Satan spawn who are bringing about the end of the world doesn't exactly seem credible either.
Originally posted by antonia
Unfortunately this statement doesn't help your cause any. If you cannot prove the Bible to be correct (or even accurate), you cannot prove your theories to be correct, therefore this garbage about being "Non-PC" or "Talking about Revelation" is just a smokescreen for another agenda.
To sit there and proclaim "We need to bomb Iranians" based on something written 2000 years ago is insane.
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by VinceP1974
Iran says it's their role in this world to start a nuclear war. And it's been shown that Iran is deceitful negotiator but that is moot because Iran says the issue is not up for any more diplomacy. The question is.. what does one do about that?
Can you prove the Iranian government has made such claims?
Originally posted by n1zzzn
I don't view Muslims as "spawns of satan" and I don't think the thread promotes that.
Originally posted by antonia
The "bomb the Iranians" topic really doesn't need to be included in this thread as in my mind it takes away from the actual topic @ hand. I haven't advocated such action in regards to this statement so I won't make defensive comments about it.
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by VinceP1974
Iran says it's their role in this world to start a nuclear war. And it's been shown that Iran is deceitful negotiator but that is moot because Iran says the issue is not up for any more diplomacy. The question is.. what does one do about that?
Can you prove the Iranian government has made such claims?
Originally posted by antonia
Then you are going to need to explain why several people in this thread (the OP included) have said Allah is Satan.
Originally posted by DJMessiah
Proof? You mean something like this from the Quran?
Surrah 41:37 "Among His proofs are the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. Do not prostrate before the sun, nor the moon; you shall fall prostrate before the GOD who created them, if you truly worship Him alone. "
Surrah 35:6 "Verily Satan is an enemy to you: so treat him as an enemy. He only invites his adherents,that they may become Companions of the Blazing Fire."
So you say "Allah" means "Moon God" and then "Satan." So which is it? Since you're keen on giving us an Arabic lesson on etymology, do tell us what "Allah" means in Arabic and "illlah."
[edit on 2-1-2009 by DJMessiah]
Originally posted by n1zzzn
I see where the confusion comes from against what I've said.
If the Muslim version of Allah is indeed Satan that doesn't make the Islamic people "satanic".
On the bomb Iran comments.. I agree with you but I don't think it completely removes the core of the topic.
Originally posted by drock905
The reason the bible only mentions the
Middle East is because that was the only place the writers knew existed.
Those countries are where Islam began so it makes sense that those countries would be Islamic today.
The writers never mentioned present day UK, North/South America, Asia and Europe simply because they didn't know they existed.
Originally posted by antonia
Originally posted by n1zzzn
I don't view Muslims as "spawns of satan" and I don't think the thread promotes that.
Then you are going to need to explain why several people in this thread (the OP included) have said Allah is Satan.
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by VinceP1974
I don't want conjecture from biased think tank. I want the unaltered statements.