It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by worldwatcher
i think we all agree that Saddam was a bad man, however, instead of invading and submitting the country to shock and awe under the false pretense of WMD's threat, was not the way to go about removing him.Exactly, look how they removed Jessica Lynch, I know thats a weird example, but their intelligence is better then just dropping bombs like shock and awe, they could of removed him without shock and awe....
Covert operations, secret funding, instigating rebellions, that sort of tactic should have been used, allowing the Iraqi people to make the change for themselves if they really wanted it.
I agree.................. Everybody knows they saw the American gov/military/media/agencies as the Great White Satan, why would they now want them in there to set up a government when they don't like how them in the first place??? That's why I say American gov has an agenda, and they just simply have no regard for the people of Iraq..... Hence all the gun battles today.... Iraqi people are not going to give up their country to the "great white satan"
so by the way in which saddam was removed, it left the country in a worse situation that it was in while saddam was in office...understand what i'm trying to say?