posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 01:25 AM
Originally posted by skoalman88
Since Obama hase never produced any verification of where he was born, who are they believing then?
he has provided proof. Thats not the issue. The issue is that a small group of people refuse to accept his proof
The US supreme court accepts it, why cant you?
Believing he is eligible to serve with no proof is evidence of one not conducting the necessary investigation to see if he has proved his
What is ignorant and sweeping? Please explain to me how, by pointing out that Obama has not produced any evidence that he was born in the US is
ignorant or sweeping OR that those who believe he is eligible did not conduct any research
You keep repeating yourself. For the first part, see above. HE HAS PROVIDED PROOF!!! Second I have already explained why assuming that all
people who disagree with you are ignorant and that all people who disagree with you came to their individual conclusions, the exact same way, is
ignorantr and sweeping, but since you missed it the first time,NO TWO PEOPLE FELL THE EXACT SAME WAY ABOUT EVERYTHING. That is why it is ignorant and
sweeping to suggest so.
Thank for proving my point. The SCOTUS never said there was a lack of evidence, they simply refused to hear the appeal. The original case was thrown
out for lack of standing and appealed to the SCOTUS.
Your point was that there is no grounds to base your own claims on? That doesnt really help your case....
If more people would realize this is a Constitutional matter rather than a political matter, the issue would probably be solved. Never once did I
mention a political belief, a political affiliation, or anything political; I mentioned a Constitutional problem.
Never once.. hmm, I guess suggesting that everyone who believes different than you is a sheeple has nothing to do with your politcal beliefs?I
suppose that your attempt at accusing all Obama supportes of just beleving what they do because some celebrity said to, or just voted for obama
because the MSM said too, wasnt an indication of your political belief. hmm, I dont know, seems a bit political to me....
So there is a third way one can view the eligibility issue? Enlighten me! Regardless of how they reached the conclusion they are wrong and they, not
me, are ignorant.
I will gladly enlighten you on the fact that right there I was talking about your accusation that all people who support Obama only do so because the
MSM say so , and I was talking about , right there, your indication that everyone who supports obama has the exact same political beliefs. I will
gladly enlighten you on the fact that you completley misread what I said there. I would like to be enlightened on just how you know with 100%
certainty even though you your self have said your claims are baseless,that everyone else is wrong and you are right.... Stating something as fact
when YOU DONT KNOW FOR SURE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.. is ignorant. I have said that there is more evidence that he is okay to take office than there is
that he cant, and incidently, whether you meant to or not, you agreed by saying that your own claims are baseless.
Why do we need the SCOTUS to hear the case? Why does tax dollars have to go towards this? Why has Obama spent (last I read) 500k defending these
lawsuits? Why won't he just produce the document?
The reason it would need to be heard is because he HAS provided the proof required but some people refuse to accept it. The SCOTUS would just put the
accusation to rest. Thats why
Same to you.
[edit on 1-1-2009 by gimme_some_truth]