reply to post by Zepherian
The arrogance and disregard to be seen among the chemtrail debunkers is that to be found in those incapable of the truth, or of any display of honor
or decency. Their very malignance proclaims their assertions utterly untrustworthy and specious.
There is every reason to believe, indeed, that those who call themselves debunkers are, in fact, shills for government, trying to keep the truth from
the people. They willingly admit to being considered that by many conspiracy theory examiners, and just as quickly - and without proof - dismiss the
accusation, but it seems very near the truth, if not the truth itself.
And this demonstrated malevolence of character, more so than much else, pronounces that conspiracy theories far from unreliable; indeed, anything but
unproved, or disproved.
And that includes chemtrails.
*The evidence is that, not only are chemtrails real, there seems to be a dedicated movement to try to dissuade those who acknowledge the existence of
chemtrails from following up on the subject.
Someone in government, it appears, doesn't want the people to think for themselves about what they see going on around them.
How come the chemtrail debunkers never try to explain what chemtrails 'are'.
Instead they just use insults, buzz words and tell you what chemtrails are 'not'.
The resident chemtrail Debunkers on ATS will usually offer themselves as 'experts' or 'authorities' on chemtrails and will always give you a
80-90% dose of real info layered in with their hidden propaganda message.
Another trait I’ve noticed from our debunkers is the the sheer volume of their presentation coupled with a lot of technical jargon, scientific
looking graphs and pictures to bolster the image of scientific validity and depth of investigation. When you read their posts, you can spot the party
line-loud and clear and will notice the data they supply is just another red herring and if only ever partially relevant.
This Newly Leaked Air-force “counter-blog” response plan explains alot:
Their first options are to either 1)Call you a Troll or 2)Pretend to agree with you whilst inserting their talking points into the rest of the post.
*And most importantly Always proclaim yourself to be an Authority on the Matter (ie. Pilot, Meteorologist etc.)
Examples 1 (Attack): -"I really should not feed ATS’s latest troll… "
-"Another ignorant Chemtrail Thread, just what I wanted for Christmas."
-"Or maybe they were trying to hide you from the nasty Ruskies? "
Examples 2 (Authority): -"I worked for years in this area in aviation and I have yet to see a single chemtrail"
This one is the best case yet:
"Me, an ex-airline supervisor.
Weedwhaker, an airline pilot (worked for the same Airlines as myself & flew into our station).
OztheWeatherman, a professional meteorologist (has his credentials posted if you look around for them).
Essan, a meteorologist.
OffTheStreet, a Boeing aircraft engineer.
Firepilot, a professional pilot.
Zaphod, a ex-military aircraft mechanic (and he worked for one of the companies I worked for, but at a different station). "
*These operations equate to a formal declaration of psychological warfare on the American people. The military is engaging in direct propaganda and
indoctrination.
[edit on 11-1-2009 by Exuberant1]
