Why is southern pride considered racism?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 09:20 AM by Ant4AU
reply to post by prevenge



You must have been beat up by some skin heads, or just had some ass in your family from the south. Dude what ever happened to you I am sorry, we are having a good discussion here so just piss of if you are not going to contribute. Wow, there really is nothing you can talk about without some one bringing up the illuminati. Just stay in your hole and everything will be ok.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 09:55 AM by Jemison
reply to post by daddyroo45





At that time a work mule would cost you $20,land sold for around $.25 an acre and a slave would cost around $1,000.


Where are you getting those figures? I'm sure I'll get abused for this but we have records of slave purchases and the cost of a slave was less than two pounds of bacon.

I'm proud of my southern aristocratic roots. We are still in touch with the descendants of the slaves that my ancestors owned. My family GAVE them property and real estate so that they had a place to live AND had additional real estate to rent for income. THEY attribute their success to my families generosity as it allowed the last several generations to easily afford college and have many opportunites that they wouldn't have otherwise had.

Not all slave owners were horrible and abusive, as a matter of fact, many of them were far more generous to their slaves than they were ever given credit for. They felt a personal responsibility to ensure that their former slaves were taken care of and provided for but you never hear about those stories.

Jemison


[edit on 31-12-2008 by Jemison]


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 11:13 AM by saturnine_sweet
Those who find it racist are letting their ignorance show. Slavery wasn't about race; there were slaves who were not black. It was about social status. At the time, the social status of slavery tended to be attached to blacks because they came from less advanced cultures where their enemies (who were also black) sold them into slavery. Slavery was part of a socio-economic order in the past, not some hateful atrocity, and the south supported it because the entire economy of the south was based upon it. The wealth of the south was in slaves, not banks, unlike the north. The Emancipation Proclamation was designed to cripple the South economically, more than anything else, and it was successful. So successful that there are large parts of states like Alabama that look pretty much like a third world country.

Tell me, if someone came and took all your wealth, your LEGAL wealth, and gave you no compensation, wouldnt you be angry? Every slave had a price for freedom, and it went unpaid. As rampant poverty struck the south as a result of all of this, who do you expect the locals to blame for their fall? A slave was not going to be free in their eyes until the wages of their freedom had been paid.

People need to get past their ignorance of history and become able to look at things through the lens of past social orders. Remember, too, that most of those slaves who were sold into slavery and brought to the Americas actually got a better life here than they would have had back in Africa. After all, if they hadn't been worth anything in the meat market, they would have been killed outright. Understand that, just because it offends your sensibilities, you cannot ignore reality.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 11:36 AM by asmeone2
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
reply to
post by asmeone2



I think it is safe to say that the segregation you describe exists all over the US and all over the world. In California, we have ethnic enclaves.


Oh, i didn't mean to imply that there weren't, but that for some reason people view them differently whether they are in the North or South.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 12:01 PM by daddyroo45
reply to post by Jemison



The decendents of the black families that were attached to my family before the war.Attended family reunions with us when I was a child.I remember the lady we all called Aunt Callie she was 96 years old in 1960. She remembered the first years after the war,and related stories told to her from her father,of the relations between our families.
As far as the cost of $1000 for a slave.That was a premium reserved for the finest and fittest.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 01:25 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by dooper


Were the slaves that went North, to the free states treated with respect? They were treated worse than the ones that decided not to leave the south. They were hated by the Northern People, and were put into slavery with a different name. But in reality it was still slavery. They were worked and their pay was a shack and food which was not of the best quality. They were not treated with very much respect. And if the Union had such a noble cause as freeing the slaves and punishing the South. Why then did General Sherman march on Atlanta burn it to the ground, rape the Black Slave Women, and kill the Black Men? I am a Southerner I love the south and all the people in it. And I for one say it would not be the South without both people Black and White. That is what makes this such a wonderful place. Just because we still hold on to the Stars and Bars does not mean that we are a bunch of racist idiots. Their were also Black Soldiers that fought for the Stars and Bars. I am not saying that slavery was right it wasn't. General Robert E. Lee did not approve of slavery,at all he was against slavery. He like most of Southerners loved the land that he lived on and swore to protect it from aggression from the Union State. Southern Pride is not a bad thing. We love our Southern Heritage NOT HATE.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 01:36 PM by saturnine_sweet
reply to post by sciencenewby



um because the north gave them freedom without having to pay for it?? Say youre a poor nobody...and someone came along and said they would make you a billionaire elite, if you fought for them...most people would jump at that, too. A chance to change their social status for the price of going to war.

All in all, your reply doesnt seem to even show a grasp of historical social structure, or the very concept of social structure at all.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 01:57 PM by Ant4AU
reply to post by Jemison



Weagle Weagle Weagle War Damn Eagle. Wow this stuff is great I am finding out things that I didn't know. I am glad to see that there are more people that feel the same as I. Thank you all for your comments.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 03:35 PM by redhead57
reply to post by OhZone



You can't be serious! Slavery was and is evil, man had and still has no right to own another. Being considered property and having your children sold away from you, rape by the owners and then they were so sick they enslaved their own children.

It is unfortunate that the Confederate Flag is associated with slavery, but that is just the way it is. The South wanted to removed itself from the Union of States so they could continue to profit from the blood, sweat and tears of men and women. I find that flag as offensive as the Nazi symbol.



reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 03:40 PM by Ant4AU
reply to post by redhead57




Have you even read this thread or researched. Slavery was not the reason. Please do a little more research.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 04:00 PM by daddyroo45
reply to post by redhead57



Every culture has endured slavery to a different culture at some point in history. The Bible is replete with reference to slaves and how they are supposed to treat their masters and vice versa.Life is a learning process,200 years ago slavery was common place world wide.We as the human race have learned slavery is wrong. Just because the institution of slavery is found unpaletable today,doesn't mean the people in those days weren't following cultural standards of the day.
Two hundred years ago young girls 10-12 years old would be considered marriage material.That was a common practice that would not be acceptable by todays standards. Had your great great great grandfather married a 12 year old girl would that make you a child molester?
My point is, time marches on.I have never been a slave to another nor have I ever held another as a slave.I'd be willing to bet that there is no one born in this country that has ever kept a slave or been a slave.
When will the stupitidy cease? In this country people are responsible for their own actions.Not their fore fathers actions.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 04:01 PM by Ant4AU
Source: www.progressiveu.org...

"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, not to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having that superior position assigned to the white race."

-Abraham Lincoln (Lincoln-Douglas debates, Sept 18, 1858)


[edit on 12/30/2008 by seentoomuch]

This is from the savior of the slaves. Why in the hell would he go to war over the slaves. While he states that they are inferior.

Stole your source toomuch hipoe you don't mind



[edit on 31-12-2008 by Ant4AU]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^