post by HunkaHunka
how far away were you when you saw this "plane" no one is saying that nothing hit the pentagon.. but it was definetly not a boeng 757,perhaps you
should see testimony from an insiders account someone who lived thru the "crash"
By helping the attack succeed, defendants and their cohorts created a basis for the seizure of extraordinary power, and a pretext for launching the
so-called Global War on Terror, in the guise of which they were free to pursue plans for military conquest, “full spectrum dominance” and
“American primacy” around the world; as they have done,” reads the lawsuit.
Attorney William Veale says that if the lawsuit gets past a motion to dismiss, it may be the key which will unlock a plethora of disturbing questions
about 9/11.
“What they don’t want is for this to go into discovery,” William Veale told Raw Story. “If we can make it past their initial motion to dismiss
these claims, and we get the power of subpoena, then we’ve got a real shot at getting to the bottom of this. We’ve got the law on our side.”
The full text of the lawsuit is reprinted below.
—————————————————————————
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___
APRIL GALLOP, for Herself and as Mother and Next Friend of ELISHA GALLOP, a Minor, No. _____________
Plaintiff, Jury Trial Demanded
vs.
DICK CHENEY, Vice President of the U.S.A., DONALD RUMSFELD, former U.S. Secretary of Defense, General RICHARD MYERS, U.S.A.F. (Ret.), and John Does
Nos. 1– X, all in their individual capacities, Defendants.
__________________________________________
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSPIRACY, AND OTHER WRONGS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. This case arises from the infamous Attack on America of Sept 11, 2001, and especially on the Pentagon; and is premised on an allegation of broad
complicity in the attack on the part of key U.S. Government officials, beginning with and led from the top by Vice President Dick Cheney,
then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and Richard Myers, then acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The plaintiffs allege that these and
other government officials, whose identities will be ascertained from their proven or evident relevant roles and activities, and who are named herein
as ‘John Doe’ defendants, together with other known and unknown operatives and functionaries, official and otherwise, engaged in an unlawful
conspiracy, or a set of related, ongoing conspiracies, in which the concrete objective was to facilitate and enable the hijacking of the airliners,
and their use as living bombs to attack buildings containing thousands of innocent victims; and then to cover up the truth about what they had
done.
2. The defendants’ purpose in aiding and facilitating the attack, and the overall object of the conspirac(ies), was to bring about an unprecedented,
horrifying and frightening catastrophe of terrorism inside the United States, which would give rise to a powerful reaction of fear and anger in the
public, and in Washington. This would generate a political atmosphere of acceptance in which the new Administration could enact and implement radical
changes in the policy and practice of constitutional government in our country. Much of their intention was spelled out prior to their coming into
office, in publications of the so-called Project for the New American Century, of which defendants Cheney and Rumsfeld were major sponsors. There they
set forth specific objectives regarding the projection of U.S. military power abroad, particularly in Iraq, the Persian Gulf, and other oil-producing
areas. They observed, however, that the American people would not likely support the actions the sponsors believed were necessary, without being
shocked into a new outlook by something cataclysmic: “a new Pearl Harbor”. By helping the attack succeed, defendants and their cohorts created a
basis for the seizure of extraordinary power, and a pretext for launching the so-called Global War on Terror, in the guise of which they were free to
pursue plans for military conquest, “full spectrum dominance” and “American primacy” around the world; as they have done.
3. In pursuit of the goals of the conspiracy, the named and unnamed defendants knowingly and by agreement committed a series of acts and omissions
which were aimed at and did generally accomplish the following objectives:
+ To permit the men they later identified as the hijackers and any immediate accomplices to enter and remain in the country, and carry out the
activities, movements and communications needed in their preparations for the hijacking, free from interference by police or counter-terrorist
authorities; and then allow the groups of these men to book passage, all on the same day, and board the flights;
+ To cause normal operation of the regular off-course airline flight interception practice of the US Air Force, in cooperation with civil flight
control authorities, to be altered, suspended or disrupted in such a way as to remove its protections, at least on that day, and thus permit three of
the four apparently hijacked planes to reach their targets and crash into them (or appear to do so…);1
+ To cause the normal operation of ground and air defenses which guard the Pentagon from external attack to be altered, suspended or disrupted in such
a way as to remove or negate the building’s normal protections, and thus permit an airliner, believed to be hijacked by possible suicide bombers,
and following a forbidden, descending flight path, to reach the Pentagon undeterred;
+ To cause and arrange for high explosive charges to be detonated inside the Pentagon, and/or a missile of some sort to be fired at the building, at
or about the time the wayward airliner supposedly arrived there, to give the false impression that hijackers had crashed the plane into the building,
as had apparently happened in New York;
+ To arrange, thereafter, and fabricate, propound and defend, as part of the conspiracy, an elaborate, highly complex and sophisticated cover-up,
centering around the Report of the 9/11 Commission, and continuing to this day. To this end, defendants misappropriated the highest authority of
government to block, misdirect and otherwise evade any fair, independent investigation of the evidence, and officially if implausibly explain away the
evident wholesale failure of America’s defenses with misinformation, omissions and distortions, withheld and destroyed evidence, and outright
lies.
4. In the attack on the Pentagon, in particular, plaintiff avers that the official story, that a hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon and exploded
(causing the plaintiff’s injuries), is false. In fact, the bombing was accomplished another way, so as to limit the damage, protect the defendants,
and only make it appear that a plane had been crashed into the building. This claim is supported by data from the plane’s supposed “black box”,
released by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which indicate the plane passed over the building at very low altitude, just as an
explosion and fireball were engineered by other means, a planted bomb or bombs and/or a missile. This is supported by the lack of any photographic
evidence of a wrecked airliner at the Pentagon, compounded by the record of reported refusal by the U.S. Department of Justice to release some 85
video tapes from surveillance cameras in locations at or near the Pentagon, which it has declared exempt from Freedom of Information Act
disclosure.
5. Whatever way the bombing of the Pentagon was accomplished, however, and whatever else may or may not have been done by defendants to facilitate the
hijackings that day, it is clear the defendant top commanders would have had and did have, at a profound minimum, enough foreknowledge, on that day
