Did you know the Keebler Elves have WMD's? Are you aware that Gilligan was seen swimming in Hawaii when they were supposed to be marooned?

EVERYTHING is a conspiracy if you WANT it to be.

Does our government tell us the truth? Simply put NO

This doesn't mean everything is a conspiracy? NO

Pretending to research something by looking for things that back up your preconceived ideas, IS NOT RESEARCH.

FACT planes were flown into the WTC towers.
FACT the WTC towers fell

If bombs were placed in the parking structure of the WTC why do people suspect the government did it instead of the terrorists? (Who by the way already set bombs off there in 93)

That would make too much sense

Instead we have conspiracies popping up which make no sense nor have any evidence whatsoever to back them up. A firefighter says the building 7 is going to come down. SO WHAT! Other people KNOW things BEFORE you do.

As far as research, I would be willing to look at ANY research that was actually done, (not clicking a mouse pretending to be a researcher that doesn't cut it with me)

Did we land on the moon in 69? Simply put NO

There is too much QUALITY evidence out there refuting the claim of landing.

As far as the WTC evidence? WEAK if you want to classify any of it as evidence.

I am reminded of the Y2K scare about the train switches being computer controlled. When the conspiracy nut made that claim NONE of the train switching was computer controlled. Some were remote controlled by the people on the train, as they got close enough to the switch
for the remote to work. the majority of switches in the US at that time were MANUAL. That means you had to GET OUT and switch it with muscle power.

This is just ONE example of nutcases taking things way too far based on emotions.
I used to believe we landed on the moon in 69. I don't anymore because someone said "hey look at this and tell me what you think"

Hmm interesting concept, " YOU TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK"

If you ask 10 people to tell you what they think after looking at the evidence, ( not listening to the monologue of emotional baggage) and someone says WAIT A MINUTE something isn't right. Then you might have something. I don't see that happening in this instance.

I believe the governments INACTION is the conspiracy. There are enough people around the world to carry out the mission who hate the US.
The government simply looked the other way.

I

Another point to consider...

If 9/11 WAS carried out by muslim extremists, wouldn't the 'success' of that mission spur even more terrorist attacks? Why stop there?

If they were as resourceful as we have been told (taking flying lessons in a Cessna to learn how to fly a Boeing jet), despite all the security being scaled up everywhere, surely by now they would have done something else just as dramatic.

It seems all too 'convenient' to me that the invasion of Afghanistan occurred soon after, at a time when Unocal were looking to place an oil pipeline across Afghanistan, when previously, the Taliban government had refused it.

And who is president of Afghanistan now? Why, Mr. Hamid Karzai, and who did he work for as a consultant previously to 9/11? Unocal!

Like I say. All too convenient.

So with all of this "evidence", then who are the people that should be on trial for all this? I don't want names of people who could be linked to it, but actual proof, that these so called people where responsible for this. Again, I'm not looking for theories, back-door ideas, "links", or anything of such, but actual, concrete PROOF! Whats ONE name of a person who set ONE of these so called bombs in the towers?

Give it to me, and I'll start to think otherwise, until then, I would think that you are crazy, that you are insane, that you are delusional until I see actual proof other then assumption and possible links. Thanks

[edit on 4-1-2009 by TravisT]

They say that if you claim to crazy, insane, delusional, brainwashed, you probably aren't. We are all sharing the experience of Alice as she journeyed down the rabbit hole. Having, reluctantly, been launched on Alice's journey in the early 1990s, I miss my previous naivete regarding the "known," accepted, and the "provable."

I am thankful that we can talk freely about these things, even if we never fully agree on what happened or what they mean.

I would not argue with one contributor here who could not accept video snippets from sites like, YouTube, or take them seriously. A documentary I would recommend certainly underscores that point (Century of the Self, a BBC documentary). Edward Bernays, a central person in that documentary (Sigmund Freud's nephew), and the Father of Public Relations, earned his wealth and reputation manipulating the media.

Polarbeardr