The Photograph that Contains Evidence of Life on Mars

reply to post by spikedmilk


After 'wasting' 30 minutes of enlarging the original photo,

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

www.google.ca...=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=http:%2F%2Fphotojournal.jpl.nasa.gov%2Fjpeg%2FPIA10214.jpg+++&oq=http:%2F%2Fphotojournal.j pl.nasa.gov%2Fjpeg%2FPIA10214.jpg+++&gs_l=hp.3..0i30.5687.5687.1.11672.1.1.0.0.0.0.282.282.2-1.1.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.mJxX9z1j9sA&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc .r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=54b121497f45df7d&bpcl=38093640&biw=1024&bih=591


and after zooming into 300%, it's Obvious that this is 'simply' shadows on the rocks creating an illusion of 'humanoid' 'Martian 'aLiEn' FoRmS..Studying Art Helps develop one's visual perception of Reality vs Fantasy based Imagination.

reply to post by born2BWild


Looking at it from this view, it is amazing they even saw the "Woman."

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

Do you see it?
Try again.

img.dailymail.co.uk...


Looks like a mermaid to me, with a fish down below to her right.


img.dailymail.co.uk...

reply to post by JBAstro


Your last link does not work.

I wonder if they called it "Husband Hill" because the 'woman' is next to it?
Which came first, the woman or the husband?

reply to post by Moz08


How can anyone call it a man when it clearly has breast?
And how can anyone call a longhaired naked woman a rock?
How can a rock have an arm and a hand sticking out and be so much darker than everything around it?

A shadow maybe, a rock no.

NASA people took 2 years studying this photo?
Why didn't NASA just take another photo of it from another view?

Or maybe they did, and it is a statue : )