The Photograph that Contains Evidence of Life on Mars

page: 5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in


posted on Nov, 9 2012 @ 06:28 PM
reply to post by spikedmilk

After 'wasting' 30 minutes of enlarging the original photo,,or.r_gc .r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=54b121497f45df7d&bpcl=38093640&biw=1024&bih=591

and after zooming into 300%, it's Obvious that this is 'simply' shadows on the rocks creating an illusion of 'humanoid' 'Martian 'aLiEn' FoRmS..Studying Art Helps develop one's visual perception of Reality vs Fantasy based Imagination.

posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 04:13 PM
reply to post by born2BWild

Looking at it from this view, it is amazing they even saw the "Woman."

Do you see it?
Try again.

Looks like a mermaid to me, with a fish down below to her right.
edit on 10-11-2012 by spiritualarchitect because: (no reason given)

posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 04:22 PM
reply to post by JBAstro

Your last link does not work.

I wonder if they called it "Husband Hill" because the 'woman' is next to it?
Which came first, the woman or the husband?

posted on Nov, 10 2012 @ 04:35 PM
reply to post by Moz08

How can anyone call it a man when it clearly has breast?
And how can anyone call a longhaired naked woman a rock?
How can a rock have an arm and a hand sticking out and be so much darker than everything around it?

A shadow maybe, a rock no.

NASA people took 2 years studying this photo?
Why didn't NASA just take another photo of it from another view?

Or maybe they did, and it is a statue : )

new topics

top topics
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in