David Wilcock - Best theory on 2012 to date?

page: 3
79
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Solomons
Ok pine cone you are correct but david isnt,calcium does not build up in the pineal gland through fluoride consumption..there is no correlation,not saying his assumption is false just no scientific evidence which begs the question where he pulled that from....although i have a good hypothesis where he did.As for the pseudo science that i know about...i cant be bothered explaining,will take too long,say what you like about the fact i cant be bothered,research some unbiased sites and you will see right through this BS without batting an eyelid.Regurgitating things i have already repeated many times isnt my bag.


OT:
Lol, so you can`t be bothered? Said twice even. If you can`t bother to post your side of it, then why bother us at all?




posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by lupusyonderboy
Whew. I can't deal with this he's too nutty. He strikes me as the type to be getting folks together on 2012 to drink some tainted kool aid.


OT:
Spoken no truer then from someone who doesn`t even know him or his work. Let`s all just get together and become fundamentalist Christians then.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by FiatLux

Originally posted by Solomons
Ok pine cone you are correct but david isnt,calcium does not build up in the pineal gland through fluoride consumption..there is no correlation,not saying his assumption is false just no scientific evidence which begs the question where he pulled that from....although i have a good hypothesis where he did.As for the pseudo science that i know about...i cant be bothered explaining,will take too long,say what you like about the fact i cant be bothered,research some unbiased sites and you will see right through this BS without batting an eyelid.Regurgitating things i have already repeated many times isnt my bag.


OT:
Lol, so you can`t be bothered? Said twice even. If you can`t bother to post your side of it, then why bother us at all?


Because its basic science and physics to anyone who actually attended school..if you cant grasp that i doubt me saying anything would change your mind.And like i said i cant be bothered...continue living in everything other than reality.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by FiatLux
Spoken no truer then from someone who doesn`t even know him or his work. Let`s all just get together and become fundamentalist Christians then.


this feels like taking lots of facts and theories and putting them into a washing machine... this movie would be the end result


I'm incredibly bored today so I'm actually watching the movie. I'm just amazed i have not seen the lion and Egyptian symbols when i visited the Vatican... then again it's a big place. and i don't believe in those crop circles thing, yes they are just a few people with planks (maybe a dozen or more in the case of complex circles).



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:30 PM
link   
Here is the truth about everything:

The Universe, everything, the planets, life, just is. And so are we. For a little while.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:34 PM
link   
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone can provide a link that has a synopsis of what this gentleman is stating.

I want to read about it before committing the hour or whatever in watching the films.

Thanks much



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:40 PM
link   
The '___' stuff is correct, though I am not brave enough to try it. Joe Rogan has and has talked about at at length.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by lupusyonderboy
Here is the truth about everything:

The Universe, everything, the planets, life, just is. And so are we. For a little while.


BTW before anyone gets upset I don't believe this, just felt like stealing something from George Carlin. I am pretty interested in this guy.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:51 PM
link   
David Wilcock is one of the few men in his field who I trust completely. That video in the OP - in its original Google Video entirety - recently was the number 1 watched video in the world according to Google.

The information in his video is really just a primer. He has a book available at his website free to read online called the Shift of the Ages. Every subject he touches on in the video he expands upon in this book, and he backs up all of his claims with scientific and historical proof. At the very least it is a pretty interesting read, and not a waste of time or full of rediculous theories.

His website is also called Divine Cosmos. There he has alot of information, mostly for free, that you can visit and see if you like what he's saying. Just a warning though, his forum kind of tends to attract some of those 'GFL people', if you know what I mean.

Other than that there really isn't much else I can say about the guy. If you want to know where he comes from check out his four part video series on YouTube with Project Avalon. Also there is an AMAZING video with him again with the Avalon crew, called Futuretalk 2 or something like that. Here is the link to this one as well. (Highly Recommended)



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Solomons
 



Ok, any time we have a science or physics based topic in the forum, i`ll come and get you so we can have an expert view point on it then. Wow, some people. Just like anything basic, it gets built upon over time. He`s not the only one who has done that. But then again, you would have to think beyond the basics. I`m not sure if you would do that.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:16 PM
link   
reply to post by TheStev
 


Thank you TheStev, I've actually heard about the nodes before, some of them supposedly seemed burned and become bulbous (which is weird), however I don't see that as a reason to jump to wild conclusions (such as ET or some bizarre Electro-magnetic phenomenon) and could somehow be caused by whatever process the hoaxers are using. Don't get me wrong, an explanation for all crop circles doesn't exist, I'm just saying I see no conclusive evidence that anything but human beings are involved in their making...

As for the video, I got around to watching the other parts and found some of his material humorously difficult to swallow, some of it, however, does sound plausible. The pine-cone symbolism and pineal gland dream-state stuff was fascinating but I find all the wild connections between reality and movies and stuff about ET, time travel, etc to be way out there and not at all credible... I come up with wild stuff similar to what this guy does all the time, mainly for Sci-Fi stories, perhaps I should start giving seminars



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:23 PM
link   
I've tripped on acid about 10 times and man. I took 2 hits and a gram of speed once and you can't even imagine where I went. I suppose if I talked about it people would think I am a nut. I am starting to get on board with him.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:25 PM
link   
How can you guys really be serious? This is total crap. Please slow down your thinking process and take each of this guy's statements apart for examination. He just throws a bunch of crap at you and expects you to build bridges between widely divergent ideas and realms of thought. Just start at video 1 for example and take his comparison with Cayce's life and his. I laughed outloud and I can't believe no one in the audience did. This is group-think at its worst. I thought the republicans had the corner on that. For gods sake people. Come on!!



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by and14263

I agree that some of his theories are good. He mentions things about the pineal gland that are interesting an dlink in with a lot of other things. I do however feel he is merely regurgitating studies of old with his own spin.


That was my impression as well. I kind of like the guy and he seems genuine in the fact that I believe *he* believes everything he is saying. That said, it does seem like a hodge podge of theories I have seen elsewhere all brought together.

I did find the aspect of the phi/golden ratio being tied to the 2012 'countdown' interesting. I'd like to find more information on that as it would, in theory, give one specific dates at which 'events' could be expected to occur, and occur more and more frequently as we get closer to 2012. A way to maybe validate the theory that 2012 is indeed going to equate to some radical change, good or bad.


[edit on 29-12-2008 by soma_pills]



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by FiatLux
reply to post by Solomons
 



Ok, any time we have a science or physics based topic in the forum, i`ll come and get you so we can have an expert view point on it then. Wow, some people. Just like anything basic, it gets built upon over time. He`s not the only one who has done that. But then again, you would have to think beyond the basics. I`m not sure if you would do that.


Sarcasm doesnt buy you respect.Just a tip....look into his love for the russian embryo dna to egg via light...then come back.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by lupusyonderboy
Here is the truth about everything:

The Universe, everything, the planets, life, just is. And so are we. For a little while.


Haha..excellent post.
I really can't believe that people can "scientifically" speak about the "divinity" of universe and such stuff. We think we are too clever to understand the universe, but could it be a trick of evolution that we should think that way? I think universe, or call whatever you want, doesnt give a damn # to our garbage consciousness.

[edit on 29-12-2008 by commodore64]



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:48 PM
link   
reply to post by King neptune117
 


Thank you very much. 2012 has always grabbed my attention.
But finally there is an explanation or theory that adds more to the 2012 doomsday theory.
I always enjoy hearing new twists or thoughts, especially on this topic.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 07:57 PM
link   
Wow.... that was long, and complicated. He had excellent research and I can tell he spent a lot of time on it. I don't know if its me, but some of the stuff sounded extreme outlandish, believalbe to a point. He had great connections and ideas and I applaud him for that.

I don't know whether what he said will come true or not, but I can be FOR SURE ON ONE THING:

That if things keep on accelerating at this pace, the Global Feeling will be extreme chaotic and crazy.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 08:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by paul76
These threads that involve watching hours upon hours of film really irritate the life out of me. I have absolutely no appetite to watch another Kook talking about complete drivel. I'm not even tempted to watch the first part, let alone ten


It would be much better if the Op was to give more details and background about the videos he was displaying. Not everybody has the time to watch these videos.



If you took 10 minutes of your time to watch the first part, you would WANT to watch the rest. I cant even explain his presentation there is so much to take in I dont even know where to start.

I love though that his theory is not a doomsday theory. There is NO evidence suggesting 2012 is bad. The mayan calendar ends, big whoop. This could mean anything. Just like David said, in the time travel experiment they hit a wall at 2012.

[edit on 29-12-2008 by King neptune117]



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 08:27 PM
link   
excellant topic, i loved watching the videos. Many thanks to the OP for this. I'm away now to see if i can find anything to substantiate it all, hehe.

Take care
Wayne





new topics
top topics
 
79
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join