David Wilcock - Best theory on 2012 to date?

page: 2
79
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by King neptune117
 


Instead of youtube, with their divided videos, lets use google video... one nice chunk and is not blocked by company web filters and blockers.

video.google.com...




posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 02:59 PM
link   
i will post another reply no doubt on here: but i thank you for posting the wonderful thread!


I am just a minute or so into the first movie and of course David Wilcox is a step ahead of many as i would put it. I am very excited and thrilled for the enigma of the future. I cannot wait and feel that im learning SO many new things about it each and every day.


Cant wait to see us all in the new light! Cheers



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 03:25 PM
link   
Nice presentation.What gives me pause however is the constant comparison with sci-fi tv shows.Hes a big stargate sg1 fan which is ok,its just a bit too much at times.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 03:59 PM
link   
These threads that involve watching hours upon hours of film really irritate the life out of me. I have absolutely no appetite to watch another Kook talking about complete drivel. I'm not even tempted to watch the first part, let alone ten


It would be much better if the Op was to give more details and background about the videos he was displaying. Not everybody has the time to watch these videos.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:01 PM
link   
Can someone please provide a synopsis of what this gentleman says in these videos.

Seems like its good from the replies but some clarification on what his views are of 2012 and the pineal gland would be much appreciated.

Or a link to somewhere that has a brief synopsis of his views on it.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:03 PM
link   
This guy is a discredited hack and youre a tool for even watching this spew.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:10 PM
link   
S+F

I Enjoyed this immensely covered a lot of topics, I agree with a lot of the stuff he said , some of it crosses into my own research and gave me useful insights.


my thoughts are best explained here on how we need to change our thoughts to positively influence the future.


How to save the World, and influence things


thank for great thread had a few bits that were new to me, i did waver slightly with the constant references to movies to prove his points but this has to be taken into context..

He was trying to hammer home the point of the truth is hidden in plain sight because that's the best way to keep it from the masses and safeguard the secret



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:28 PM
link   
reply to post by King neptune117
 


I watched the first video, there's nothing special about this guy or his theories, all this new-age stuff and pseudo-science really makes it hard to believe. The crop circle portion of the first video was silly, he keeps projecting his own interpretations onto them, there is no evidence that crop circles are anything more than hoaxers with wooden boards (though I'd like to believe otherwise). I don't buy into the whole 2012 thing, not after the ruse that was Y2K, so many people fell for that and it seems as though those same people are back to bite into 2012 hook, line and sinker... The Mayan prophecies are open to interpretation and certainly I can't rule out some sort of doomsday or revolution of consciousness but I have a feeling people are letting themselves be fooled yet again...



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
there is no evidence that crop circles are anything more than hoaxers with wooden boards

I'm afraid that's not entirely true. Read up about 'node elongation'. This link for example. This is about the strongest evidence against the wooden board theory out there. Personally I find the complexity of a lot of these designs, combined with the short time in which they have appeared, to be strong evidence too, but node elongation can be proven scientifically.

Sorry for the off-topic post, but I thought it was worth pointing out that there is a reasonable amount of evidence to prove that not all crop circles are hoaxers with boards.

I haven't had a chance to watch the vid yet, thinking I'll try and get through it today at work (I love working over the Christmas break when nobody is actually doing anything). Big ups to unite_life though, I was hoping there was a complete version of this video somewhere without having to worry about all the Youtube parts.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 04:55 PM
link   
I´ve seen this a while back ago and been very interested in this guys work. He does have a very positive message wich I think is much needed when there is so much information coming out now with a much darker tone. He seems very sure about the conclusions he makes, however personaly I think he´s reaserch can be most helpful when taking it in with a great variaty of other reaserchers as well.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:21 PM
link   
this video is well old now, some of his theories are ok but they are all taken from others, nassim harramien rips him to pieces.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Wel, he is close to the truth of it all. Not quite because is still somewhat spacy in tought but I'd say he is at 84% of the truth. That's good for humanity. If it is revealed humanity will reach an age of that is unrivaled in it's history.

Of course all this inversion does make one thing to wonder about...is there an inverted universal sphere and if so, have they discovered a simular truth...yes they have. Unfortunatly humanities golden age of 2012 will be stopped like a young bird having it's wings snapped off.

It two opposides exist and they both reach their form of perfection it is only perfect for them to become one...and that would be bad.


*Ugh...I hate uninvited guests

[edit on 29-12-2008 by AncientShade]



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Solomons
Yeah alot of his science is pretty much pseudo science...typical new ager.Id like to see his new career in 2013..like any conman he will move on to a new scene.


Ah yes. Spoken like a true judge. Can you please explain just how he is a conman?



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Solomons

Originally posted by mortje
I'm not that much into religions so maybe a bible fanatic can explain why there is a huge pineapple in the Vatican?

Do like the whole Iraq war thing, oil does seem to obvious. Maybe that is what Rice means in the other topic
.


Pineapple? im sure it was an acorn he was talking about,third eye and all that jazz...


No, it was a pine cone. That is why the little gland in our brains is called the pineal gland. Pine-al



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:42 PM
link   
hmmm this machine sounds like a tree of knowledge of sorts. "see your future (eat of this tree), and you shall surely die"...cause if you see your future you might try to change it which isn't in harmony with God...just tossin' it out there.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:43 PM
link   
To experience this transformation one's heart must be prepared.

An unforgiving heart that is filled with hatred, bitterness, wrath, vengeance, vindictiveness, strife, envying, callousness, cruelty, meanness, pride etc. will not experience this.

Those who seek to rid themselves of such dark elements and turn to the pure elements of the Divine nature are those that will experience the transformation.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by King neptune117
yea lol that Edgar Cacey thing makes no sense. His theories on other subjects are really well. The pineal gland he talks about in other videos makes quite a bit of sense also.


And the Edgar Cayce thing makes no sense because? Please, enlighten us. I need a good laugh today.

[edit on 29-12-2008 by FiatLux]



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 05:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tricky63
Nice presentation.What gives me pause however is the constant comparison with sci-fi tv shows.Hes a big stargate sg1 fan which is ok,its just a bit too much at times.


It`s more of a down to Earth picture of what it may look like is all. Some people may have trouble picturing in their minds what he is talking about. It`s just a tool to help them understand better.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:06 PM
link   
Ok pine cone you are correct but david isnt,calcium does not build up in the pineal gland through fluoride consumption..there is no correlation,not saying his assumption is false just no scientific evidence which begs the question where he pulled that from....although i have a good hypothesis where he did.As for the pseudo science that i know about...i cant be bothered explaining,will take too long,say what you like about the fact i cant be bothered,research some unbiased sites and you will see right through this BS without batting an eyelid.Regurgitating things i have already repeated many times isnt my bag.



posted on Dec, 29 2008 @ 06:09 PM
link   
Whew. I can't deal with this he's too nutty. He strikes me as the type to be getting folks together on 2012 to drink some tainted kool aid.





new topics
top topics
 
79
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join