reply to post by hawk123
I personally go for the answer of the astronomer.
Wow. Did you read it? How can you go for the guy who refuses to assess the other guys evidence? Clearly there's a bias at work here, both with you and the astronomer.
No offense, but I was shocked anyone would side with the kind closed-mindedness that is typified here. You can't refuse to look at evidence that challenges your viewpoint and still call yourself a scientist or an honest intellectual.
edit on 10-2-2011 by joechip because:
spelling
