Whats going on at yellowstone?, page 466
Pages: <<  463    464    465    466    467    468    469  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 469 times


reply posted on 30-6-2009 @ 11:49 AM by Shirakawa
3.3 Magnitude earthquake in Yellowstone, occurred between YMR and YNR seismic stations.
That's the first significant earthquake in YNP since a good while:

www.seis.utah.edu...
3.3 2009/06/30 09:52:06 44.746N 110.791W 6.6 27 km (17 mi) ENE of West Yellowstone, MT


It looks like other smaller ones occurred but didn't get added yet to the list. This 3.3 one was probably too "big" to be added only by the discretion of YNP seismologists.
See how real events will show on most (if not all) webicorders.

[edit on 2009/6/30 by Shirakawa]


reply posted on 30-6-2009 @ 01:27 PM by Shirakawa
reply to post by brokenheadphonez



As I wrote, today's 3.3 magnitude earthquake is the most significant event occurred on Yellowstone since a good while.

Unless, that is, you're interested in seismic noise caused by cars, people, animals, weather, seismic network malfunction, or signals caused by distant earthquakes, etc. (things I wouldn't even bother to report, personally).

[edit on 2009/6/30 by Shirakawa]



reply posted on 30-6-2009 @ 05:20 PM by Moshpet
reply to post by Shirakawa



Gee, sarcastic much?

I've never ever said I was an expert seismologist, though if you look at the 16:38UTC quake, it doesn't show very well on many of the sensors, which could make it easy to discount as actually being a quake.

If YPP was animal created, wth hasn't that signal pattern showed up before now???

Also, unlike UoU I pay attention to the park on the weekend.

M.

[edit on 30-6-2009 by Moshpet]


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 11:21 AM by Moshpet
Originally posted by ressiv
okay.... new cluster...
question..is there a regulair time line in it....

if so.... wat cuases it...the sun ..planets....watever...


Well if you look at the prior signals @ YPP, on the 29th, 27th you can see the signal start off small, then grow over time to a max intensity, after which it starts to go lower again.

Then if you look at today's cluster there is a small spike a pause then a larger one. If you contrast that to the typical earth quake signal, there are some similarities, enough so that I would say it's a micro-quake (under 1.0), with a small after quake. Then a few moments later a second micro quake.

There has been a lot of rain in the past week or so, so it is not unlikely that a fault would get 'lubricated' from ground water and slip a little.

The University of Utah (UoU) has the responsibility for monitoring and evaluating the quakes with in the park, and a good portion of the Inter Mountain West. In time you will see that UoU does not work on the weekends, and that the only time we get reports on the weekends from the USGS site about quakes in Yellowstone, is if they are 3.0+ and are picked up by folks 'other' than the UoU. They will staff the monitors on the weekend if there is a excessive amount of activity, like say at the beginning of the year. If you take today's reports of quakes from Utah, I just recently got a email report stating there was a 1.0 in Utah... for 10:05 UTC... and it's several hours after that.

Personally I think it's kinda stupid to have to wait for UoU to have the time to decide what is a quake and what isn't. I also think that they are missing a crap load of interesting things. SO I am looking for the 'cool and odd' signals, trying to see if there is something happening.

What I do when looking at the sensors is first I look at the right hand side for the UTC time of the signal. Then I open a pair of new tabs, one showing the World Earth Quake list (3.0 & greater) then I open the US Earth Quake List (1.0) and greater. Then I look for events within 5 minutes of the signal on the 1.0+ USA list , that I am trying to figure out the cause of. If there is a reported event 5 minutes prior to the one I am checking the time of, it's related to that one.

Then looking at the World 3.0+ list it gets a bit trickier. Cali & Alaska events take 3-4 minutes to reach the park. Puerto Rico takes about 12-15 minutes, and so on. Basically if there is an quake listed within 20 minutes prior and it's within the South America Region you can discount that event.

Further out, the events if they are 5.0+ show up as Love waves, (sawtooth) but it takes a serious quake to generate them.

Largely it falls to you to decide what is noteworthy and to learn what the signals may be. The ATS motto is to deny ignorance, so read up, learn and ask questions.

M.


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 01:41 PM by Shirakawa
Monthly update from Yellowstone Volcano Observatory (YVO):

YELLOWSTONE VOLCANO OBSERVATORY MONTHLY UPDATE
Wednesday, July 1, 2009 12:09 MDT (Wednesday, July 1, 2009 18:09 UTC)




YELLOWSTONE VOLCANO (CAVW#1205-01-)
44.43°N 110.67°W, Summit Elevation 9203 ft (2805 m)
Volcano Alert Level: NORMAL
Aviation Color Code: GREEN

June 2009 Yellowstone Seismicity Summary

During the month of June 2009, 77 earthquakes were located in the Yellowstone region. The largest event was a magnitude 3.3 on June 30 at 9:52 AM MDT, located about 15 miles east northeast of West Yellowstone, MT. This event was part of an ongoing small earthquake swarm that includes 25 events on June 30, beginning with the M3.3 The magnitudes during the swarm ranged from 3.0 to -0.2.

Earthquake activity in the Yellowstone region is at relatively normal background levels.

Ground Deformation Summary: Through June 2009, continuous GPS data show that uplift of the Yellowstone Caldera has slowed but may be continuing. The WLWY station, located in the northeastern part of the caldera, has undergone a total of ~23 cm of uplift since mid-2004. Its record can be found at:
pboweb.unavco.org...

The currently observed reduction in uplift rate may be related to seasonal changes related to snowmelt and groundwater recharge. In several of the past 5 years, such changes have caused decreased uplift or slight subsidence, but were followed later in the year by continued uplift. The general uplift of the Yellowstone caldera is of scientific importance and will continue to be monitored closely by YVO staff.

An article on the current uplift episode at Yellowstone and discussion of long-term ground deformation at Yellowstone and elsewhere can be found at: volcanoes.usgs.gov...



reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 03:21 PM by Shirakawa
reply to post by Moshpet



Most of the "energetic" activity was probably due to human source - cars or something else.
Local earthquakes on webicorders have an almost instant attack, a flat spot if they're big enough to saturate the seismometer, and exponential decay.


reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 09:34 AM by Moshpet
Originally posted by Shirakawa
reply to
post by Moshpet



Most of the "energetic" activity was probably due to human source - cars or something else.
Local earthquakes on webicorders have an almost instant attack, a flat spot if they're big enough to saturate the seismometer, and exponential decay.


No offense dude, but seriously, put the following information into Google Earth, and tell me exactly what human source is going to be there.

YPK

Identifier: YPK
Name: Parker Peak, Yellowstone Park, WY
Latitude: 44° 43' 54.60"
Longitude: 109° 55' 19.19"
Elevation: 9,504' 6.9"

If you don't want to bother to look to look for yourself, I will tell you there are no freaking roads there, not to mention it is on a ridge line.

I swear you only think there is any kind of real seismic activity going on in the park if it shows up in the USGS site. If you read the report for last month even UoU/YVO recognized there were over a hundred micro-quakes.

Frankly I don't trust UoU's monitoring of the park, on the basis that they don't work on the weekends.

M.


reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 02:28 PM by Shirakawa
Originally posted by Moshpet

No offense dude, but seriously, put the following information into Google Earth, and tell me exactly what human source is going to be there.

YPK

Identifier: YPK
Name: Parker Peak, Yellowstone Park, WY
Latitude: 44° 43' 54.60"
Longitude: 109° 55' 19.19"
Elevation: 9,504' 6.9"

If you don't want to bother to look to look for yourself, I will tell you there are no freaking roads there, not to mention it is on a ridge line.


Even better: I have downloaded seismic data from that period of time and tried to analyse it and I can tell you that the source of the signal is most certainly not geologic (by the way, don't you think that such energic signals would have been detected at least by nearby seismometers?)

Yes, you are right in saying it's not directly due to car traffic, given the remote location (but it's not that vehicles can't get there... an offroad car could easily reach that place). Also signals like those in spectrograms usually look like tones which fade in, then out.

After seeing them more in detail, I say that the "energic" signals you saw on YPK seismometer are probably due to poking by animals or humans (due to maintenance?). But again, definitely not of geologic origin.

I swear you only think there is any kind of real seismic activity going on in the park if it shows up in the USGS site. If you read the report for last month even UoU/YVO recognized there were over a hundred micro-quakes.


I assure you I don't.

The problem here is that you probably should learn how to better decipher seismograms/webicorders. But your situation is understandable since usually nothing special happens in Yellowstone and YVO doesn't release much information about what happens in the park (yes, here you're right).

If for example you followed Redoubt and its ongoing eruption like I did since January you would have learned a lot more about this matter, thanks also to AVO's openness to disclose information and data, and the volcano's very variable conditions over all these months.

About the micro-quakes in last month's report, wasn't there a mini earthquake swarm two months ago?

Frankly I don't trust UoU's monitoring of the park, on the basis that they don't work on the weekends.
M.


You are probably right about UoU, but seismometers are (almost) always active and cannot be easily manipulated to lie and/or show bogus data.
By the way, most of the AVO staff and people from University of Alaska Fairbanks who collaborate with AVO don't work on weekends either.

[edit on 2009/7/5 by Shirakawa]

Pages: <<  463    464    465    466    467    468    469  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 10 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 17 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 6 days ago with 134 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 10 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 8 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 18 days ago with 73 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 93 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 70 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies