Whats going on at yellowstone?, page 240
Pages: <<  237    238    239    240    241    242    243  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 469 times


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:31 PM by quakewatcher
It looks like these are showing up on the Lake Butte sensors now:


www.seis.utah.edu...

If you look at the last two "geyser eruptions", they show up as increased activity on this one as well.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:32 PM by Mushussu
reply to post by UnklFungus



Thanks.
Sometimes I think we get going so fast here with info and posts we risk loss of things.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:36 PM by Mushussu
reply to post by sageturkey



Good morning !
You still willing to do the hot foot dance for us up at Y?

Or, would that be the fast version of the Turkey Trot?


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:41 PM by Anonymous ATS
www.geyserstudy.org...

According to this website, 35 minutes is at the far end of the curve and very rare. Also, it says that if the duration of an eruption is, say, 5 minutes, than your going to have a longer interval than an eruption with a duration of 1 minute.

Right now, according to the graph of today's activity, there is both increasing duration as well as decreasing interval. This should not be happening.

Any thoughts?


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:42 PM by Ponyboy_86
reply to post by sageturkey



hey guys ive been looking at this thread since the beginning and here's what i think is happenning. i think the tectonic pacific plate is moving to the left
first, look at this map:
hisz.rsoe.hu...
and also open this in another tab
www.learner.org...
now look at the line all the earth quakes are making on rsoe edis all the quakes are along the line of the pacific tectonic plate. now look how if the plate was moving to the left, it would push on the eurasian plate and make it move left and create all the shock in italy and all those swarm of earthquakes because thats where eurasian plate collides with african plate.. just thoughts. any comment?
not only the earthquakes but also consider the erupting volcanoes in that line. it all goes along the tectonic plate line

[edit on 6-1-2009 by Ponyboy_86]


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:42 PM by Shirakawa
reply to post by Mushussu



Ok, then I'll modify the way it's calculated on my chart, thanks.

To everybody, I think we may have missed the last event which was supposed to start at around 12:12-12:15. On Lake Butte it shows up as a faint signal at 12:16. When do you think it started and finished on LKWY?


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:46 PM by sageturkey
Originally posted by Mushussu
reply to
post by sageturkey



Good morning !
You still willing to do the hot foot dance for us up at Y?

Or, would that be the fast version of the Turkey Trot?


Mornin Back! Hope you got some sleep!

Yeah, I was driving North this morning to go pick up some work (dead computer) and had the biggest urge to just keep goin! I think we could all use a good laugh and I'd love to be the one to provide. It's a couple hours away and we don't really know what a superhighway is here in Wyoming so it's not really do-able. Gad - calls won't stop! Wah wah, I can't play my game, I can't get on ATS, wah!!!


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:50 PM by Indy
reply to post by RFBurns



I don't mean any disrespect but something isn't right about you are telling us. Perhaps you didn't understand what your friend was saying or perhaps your friend doesn't really understand how the whole network operates (IT related not how to read a seismograph) and was simply coming up with an answer for the sake of answering your questions. We all have had that happen to us where you ask someone a question and you can see they are basically making up an answer. I suspect that to be the case here.

There is nothing logical about what your friend said. Absolutely nothing. The information the scientists use to interpret the data are not tied to the web servers. Generating the web reports we see is a low power operation. It doesn't require a great deal of cpu resources or bandwidth. The data doesn't have to be redirected for further analysis. That would imply that on a daily basis the data is in jeopardy because it is going out to the web instead of to the scientists. Anyone with a personal weather station at home knows how this works. I don't have to disable my uplink feed to better analyze changing weather conditions. My weather software feeds the data to the net basically in the background. I'd go so far as to say my weather software uploads more data per station than those seismographs and I can run that easily on a home computer and home internet connection. I guarantee you the USGS has the resources to keep feeding data to their web servers.

There is no need to redirect or deflect data. It is simply not a logical solution to the puzzle.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:51 PM by Mushussu
reply to post by Ponyboy_86



Not to step on Sageturkeys toes, but he is or was off line now.
The thoughts you have brought up have been talked about a lot here.
General consensus is that yes it is all connected.


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:52 PM by sageturkey
reply to post by Ponyboy_86



Could very well be. It's definitely a global event, I think we can all agree on that. The question is, where's it going to unleash first. I'd still be watching the coast in my opinion. We're hearing about Yellowstone finally because there's many less people to panic. Start small, get them aware, break it to them gently...


reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 01:53 PM by operation mindcrime
reply to post by Indy



Please drop the freaking subject and watch the charts Shirakawa has put together....If this keeps up ,by morning that thing will be blowing nonstop.
Great job Shirakawa and please keep it up.

Ps : here's what USGS has to say bout it them selfs...

Why do some earthquakes disappear?
The earthquake data shown here is automatically generated and despite our best efforts some glitches will create bogus earthquakes. When we find a bogus event, usually by studying the seismograms, we delete it and careful observers may notice that an earthquake has disappeared. This often happens after a large earthquake when our systems don't realize that all of the seismograms were created by a single event. In this case, one earthquake will turn into multiple "events" on the maps. In other cases problems in our telemetry systems that bring the data from our seismometers to our computers create glitches that also can create bogus events. For these reasons it is very important to remember that this data is preliminary and when events disappear they weren't real to begin with.



Seems like the sensors are putting it dirctly to the site and then it is reviewed by scientists

[edit on 6/1/2009 by operation mindcrime]
Pages: <<  237    238    239    240    241    242    243  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 6 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 13 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 2 days ago with 122 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 3 days ago with 120 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 7 days ago with 107 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 4 days ago with 84 member flags
Perth Storms 21/01/2012 (Pics)
  Posted 19 days ago with 76 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 10 days ago with 75 member flags