Whats going on at yellowstone?, page 127
Pages: <<  124    125    126    127    128    129    130  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 469 times


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:22 PM by NostradamusWasHere
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady



SEL,

This is a great little video for those of us who have not been to Yellowstone (yet). The scenes really "bring home" the volatile character of the park. He suggests that the Yellowstone "hotspot" is the remnant of the of massive volcanic activity on Pangea which led to the Permian extinction event (the largest in the history of the planet), 500 million years ago. He is the first person I have heard suggest that this ancient vulcanism was due to a metorite impact - interesting. Out of curiosity I will try to find out if that portion of North America was once the area of Pangea which underwent the massive eruptions.

Thanks.


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:23 PM by dustystrings
reply to post by Not Authorized





Not to take the wind out of everybody's sails, but you have to realize you're dealing with wind conditions of 23mph with 39mph gusts across one of the largest altitude freshwater lakes in America that is currently flat as a board by being frozen over. Plus a winter storm coming that will create a ton of noise on the recorders not protected to the elements. Speaking of which the LYWY seismograph is stationed in nothing more than a concrete pillar. Want proof? Here's the seismograph from utah edu itself: external image Please tell me you don't think that the wind isn't effecting it?


Have you looked here? theinterveners.org...

Tell my why 5 years of archived data from multiple areas of YVO don't have wind contamination please?

[edit on 2-1-2009 by dustystrings]


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:24 PM by xsamaelx
reply to post by Not Authorized



Thanks for clearing that up. Are there any pictures of the YML station?

So most likely the increased activity happening at Mary Lake's just a consequence of strong winds?



reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:24 PM by toast317
reply to post by TXTriker



I'm not sure...but if he is just a private geologist...then they better get a USGS one and make it official!


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:24 PM by SevenandFive
Originally posted by beefytee
Originally posted by SevenandFive
reply to
post by iamcamouflage



Jet stream:

www.wunderground.com...


right to washington DC...THE SUPERVOLCANO IS A TERRORIST!!!


*Edit*

OH!!!
Ha-ha-ha!!!





[edit on 1/2/09 by SevenandFive]

[edit on 1/2/09 by SevenandFive]


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:25 PM by toast317
reply to post by beefytee



Hahaha, that made me laugh

I bet the terrorists are causing it to go off...they outsmarted us this time!


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:27 PM by Mushussu
reply to post by TXTriker



So,
are we hearing the familiar words of any scary movie...
"Get....out!"



reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:29 PM by Not Authorized
Originally posted by LoneInDarkness
reply to
post by Not Authorized



Maybe wind would cause some noise but not the kind we are seeing. We have already discussed the wind possibility. What we are seeing on the graphs is by far not wind.


Then maybe you can explain why YUF shows absolutely no harmonics, and is closer to the swarm than other more exposed seismographs? Apparently you didn't' look at the external picture of the exposed seismograph at Lake Yellowstone.

Quick answer: Because YUF is not exposed to the elements and shows techtonic movement only. The same with the Old Faithful recorder located in the visitor center there.

www.seis.utah.edu... _SHZ_WY.2009010200.gif


But hey, don't take my word for it. How about those that run the thing?

"Station BTU at Barney Top, Utah is sensitive to wind. This is several night-time hours of wind generated noise. Station ICU in Indian Springs Canyon, Utah and some of the Yellowstone National Park stations are also sensitive to wind. "

www.quake.utah.edu...


hmmm, some seismo's there sensitive to wind AND 39 mph gusts. Doesn't take a scientist to figure that one out.


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:30 PM by beaverg
reply to post by TXTriker



It seems like he is in fact a private geologist that also dabbles in medicinal marijuana and biofuels. Seems odd, he may have the credentials, but it doesn't seem like he has the expertise. In my own opinion anyway. The majority of the photos on his page are pot leaves so I personally think twice before saying his warning is worth heeding.


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:32 PM by NostradamusWasHere
Originally posted by xsamaelx
reply to
post by Not Authorized



Thanks for clearing that up. Are there any pictures of the YML station?

So most likely the increased activity happening at Mary Lake's just a consequence of strong winds?


I agree with DustyStrings. If the geologists at YVO don't know how to prevent and/or filter out the effects of wind on their seismograph readings, then they don't deserve to be employed there. They review all events before official posting...


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:33 PM by soma_pills
Originally posted by beaverg
reply to
post by TXTriker



It seems like he is in fact a private geologist that also dabbles in medicinal marijuana and biofuels. Seems odd, he may have the credentials, but it doesn't seem like he has the expertise. In my own opinion anyway. The majority of the photos on his page are pot leaves so I personally think twice before saying his warning is worth heeding.


Agreed. It felt to me like he was trying to drive traffic to his site based on a warning he knew a lot of people were looking for validation on. Just my opinion.


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:34 PM by Not Authorized
Originally posted by dustystrings
reply to
post by Not Authorized





Not to take the wind out of everybody's sails, but you have to realize you're dealing with wind conditions of 23mph with 39mph gusts across one of the largest altitude freshwater lakes in America that is currently flat as a board by being frozen over. Plus a winter storm coming that will create a ton of noise on the recorders not protected to the elements. Speaking of which the LYWY seismograph is stationed in nothing more than a concrete pillar. Want proof? Here's the seismograph from utah edu itself: external image Please tell me you don't think that the wind isn't effecting it?


Have you looked here? theinterveners.org...

Tell my why 5 years of archived data from multiple areas of YVO don't have wind contamination please?

[edit on 2-1-2009 by dustystrings]


Hey Look, it's wind. I didn't have to go back very far.

theinterveners.org... LKWY_SHZ_US.2007120100.gif

theinterveners.org... LKWY_SHZ_US.2007120200.gif

Shall I go find more?


reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:34 PM by xsamaelx
reply to post by dustystrings



It's amazing how you guys prove your point with solid evidence. It seems like the guy posting his wind theory won't post again =) .
Pages: <<  124    125    126    127    128    129    130  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 10 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 17 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 6 days ago with 134 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 10 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 8 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 18 days ago with 73 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 95 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 70 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies
Whitney Houston dead at 48
  Breaking General News, Posted 12 hours ago, 26 replies