|
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:35 PM by SevenandFive
|
reply to post by ressiv
Just about to post the same thing...
I just lost 2 stations on GEE. Anyone else? Something sizable just occurred.
[edit on 1/2/09 by SevenandFive]
[edit on 1/2/09 by SevenandFive]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:35 PM by Shirakawa
|
On station H18a on GEE something much bigger than normal just occurred at 18:33 UTC; H17a doesn't seem to receive any data. This seems big!
[edit on 2009/1/2 by Shirakawa]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:36 PM by xoxo stacie
|
here they come look at gee
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:37 PM by TrueAmerican
|
big event just happened, 300 on the gee meters, holy crap, that's gotta be at least a 3 if not 4. The 2.7 registered 100 on gee for comparison.
That just goes to show, if a 6+ were to hit, scale would show 1000 or better in Gee probably.
[edit on 2-1-2009 by TrueAmerican]
[edit on 2-1-2009 by TrueAmerican]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:37 PM by trusername
|
reply to post by Mushussu
oh lordy - classic too many chefs in the kitchen ruining the dinner.
ugh - this is exactly what I've seen several times in minor events.
really, there are a lot of great people that work in these places - but they're not at the top, usually. systems in general work amazingly well in
the US - and if you don't think so - travel. But in emergency, we're lazy and soft and we get burn out fast.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:37 PM by RFBurns
|
Originally posted by trusername
reply to post by RFBurns
I think it's great to talk to people there on the ground. You might also want to show them the charts.
I work a lot with the City here and I find it wise never to assume that departments are always in the know, or in excellent communication with each
other or state or federal.
I did send copies of some of the charts that have been posted in this thread along with other charts obtained directly from the USGS and Yellowstone
monitoring stations. What was surprising was when the local guy got them in his email he was excited to see so many out in the community watching the
readings and taking a great interest. I told him I was amazed as well. He did inform me that the USGS and the Wy. Geologists Association has far more
detailed siesmograph charts than are published on the websites but they are not that much different, basically those on the websites are less complex
for the general public use. They dont include much of the siesmology and geology jargon.
Im going to keep this contact info and check in with him regularly to see if they get any serious indications for a potential problem and pass it
along here. Since the charts available for the public use are general in the information provided, maybe I can get a "1 step ahead of the curve"
inside info from him and get it out to everyone if it becomes necessary.
Cheers!!!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:39 PM by Knobee
|
18:33 zulu -- All across the board. USGS reporting 3.4.. registered amplitude of 200+ on the microns/second -- and it shows up on all of the seismos
that I'm watching (H16A, H17A, H18A)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:41 PM by lernmore
|
Looks like a 3.4 just now
I guess it was waiting for me to get back to the computer.
earthquake.usgs.gov...
[edit on 2-1-2009 by lernmore]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:42 PM by SevenandFive
|
reply to post by Knobee
It showed up on TA.H19A as well.
Intensity picked up after the quake too...
[edit on 1/2/09 by SevenandFive]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:42 PM by Mushussu
|
reply to post by trusername
Oh, I have traveld!
Apathy and general dissintrest
Are as dangerous want and ignorace under the xmass present robe
Your quotes say it best!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:43 PM by spinkyboo
|
My widget tells me this one is a 3.1 - .30km - 10:32:49 PAC
Is this what other people are getting?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:43 PM by TrainDispatcher
|
I don't want to look through 2346 posts, but where do I download GEE?
Thanks again, Indy
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:44 PM by Telafree
|
showed up on the firefox addon as a 3.1, shows up Here as a
3.4
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:45 PM by Telafree
|
the USGS should see this thread. I think they'd be impressed.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:45 PM by ressiv
|
ashore norh beach off the lake
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:45 PM by Mushussu
|
USGS says that event was a 3.4
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:45 PM by SevenandFive
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:45 PM by Knobee
|
Originally posted by TrainDispatcher
I don't want to look through 2346 posts, but where do I download GEE?
Thanks again, Indy
www.seis.sc.edu...
Enjoy..
-K
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:46 PM by sageturkey
|
Originally posted by Telafree
showed up on the firefox addon as a 3.1, shows up Here as a
3.4
I'm getting 3.4 on USGS:
M 3.4, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming
Date:
Friday, January 2, 2009 18:32:49 UTC
Friday, January 2, 2009 11:32:49 AM at epicenter
Depth:
0.30 km (0.19 mi)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 12:49 PM by spinkyboo
|
Funny - widget just updated itself to a 3.4
Good widget....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |