Gilgamesh, using a temple prostitute named Shamhat, lured Enkidu from his responsibilities and civilized him. His subjects, the animals of the Forest,
turned from him. After Gilgamesh caught Enkidu and his Realm, he and Enkidu went after Humbaba. It should be mentioned that Sumerian kings were most
often also Priests, to be certain they were probably priests before they became Kings.
When Gilgamesh and Enkidu encountered Humbaba, Gilgamesh tricks him by offering one of his daughters to the King. Gilgamesh obviously uses women in
this fashion quite often. It’s obvious that Humbaba is also a King, fully arrayed with Seven Radiances, the Crown of his Glory. After some talk and
lies, Humbaba is killed, but who actually landed the blow of death was never fully decided. Just like the Jews and Romans can figure out who murdered
Jesus...it some kind of repeating phenomenon in world history.
That explanation is not really proof, but as I wrote it down it became more obvious to me that the Epic of Gilgamesh is an detailed admission of
culpability in the murder of the man the western world came to know as Christ in its sacred literature. It also implicates in this murder, armed
robbery and home invasion the fallen King and half-brother to the anointed one, Enkidu otherwise known in the Western world as Cain. As promised I
will elaborate on the link between Humbaba and Enkidu. Humbaba knew that Enkidu was his half-brother (same father) and that is why he mocked Enkidu
for his lack of sight. It is generally understood that the Beast is blind in one eye. I call Gilgamesh the Serpent because of the SH in his name and
the name of the god he worshipped, Shamash. Gilgamesh is also a priest and uses women to take down powerful men, all traits of the Serpent in the
western tradition and in practice. I tried the best I could to illustrate how the story in Genesis, especially the Chapters regarding Adam, Eve and
the Serpent and the Cain and Abel are quite obviously linkable to the Sumerian tales, albeit, not in the manner most of you would have thought.
So I reassert that the Bible and the Sumerian tales are most likely mirror reflections of one another; differing only by PERSPECTIVE.
Just to be clear and fair, Gilgamesh is also a half-brother to Enkidu (same mother) and that is why the Bible attributes Adam’s fall to listening to
his wife. Be a man. Had Cain/Enkidu been more in tune to his masculine side. He could have still bedded Shamhat, wouldn’t have had a homosexual
relationship with Gilgamesh and wouldn’t have been involved with the murder of his brother.
After all of this Enkidu died…Estranged from both the forest and the city of Uruk.
The only thing I can offer you other than what I wrote is to say look deeper into the character of Gilgamesh. Judge his actions as you’d judge a man
today.
[edit on 1-1-2009 by huckfinn]






