reply to post by IAF101
I'm sorry but I cant bother tearing the article down because should I start it would take me all day and maybe even a few days. Thats just too much
effort for something that I'm sure somebody else will regurgitate a few months later somewhere else!
I am not sure if that is true, that the British Government’s Official Correspondences and Public Records are actually some how controlled by the
Palestinians. I feel obliged to accept the British Government’s account at its word since they were in fact the lawful authority in Palestine and
being English and Angelical it would be hard to image them influenced or tainted by Islam. I have managed in my research to uncover some very
prominent Zionist British Lords like Lord Balfour and Lord Rothschild but to date no Arab Lords in the British Government or aristocracy.
I will conduct a search and see if I can uncover any Islamic, or Arab influences from within the British Government during this time frame just to
Thanks, in the meantime here is another example of the mentality involved by people like former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir as evidenced in
a Stern Gang Pamphlet from his era as the Stern Gang's leader:
A Stern Gang pamphlet found in Hadar Hacarrnel, Haifa, on May 7, 1947, illustrates their fanaticism and intellectual confusion: (1)
"Innocent blood will not be shed, but the blood of rioters, pogrom-heroes and murderers will be shed, for it is defiled. And so is the blood of each
Briton, ruling beyond the frontiers of his country. The British blood-sucker, to be a soldier, a constable, a clerk, so long as he obeys orders to
exploit and murder, he is indicted. He is here to guard the imperialist rule and prevent the rescue of the Jews. For this his blood will be shed.
It is unavoidable that in this war innocent blood will be shed as well, but there has never been a war or revolution 'with all comforts," without
privations, without destruction, without bloodshed. Let those among us who are afraid of bloodshed and destruction say openly that they surrender to a
New Munich, to each White Paper, which leads to a ghetto and ultimately to new gas-chambers a la Auschwitz. They sit in their homes waiting for the
day of the great slaughter which Bevin and his partner Kaukji are preparing for us, waiting for Jewish youth to be mobilized by the Anglo-Saxons in
their war against the Soviet Union. They cry over defiled British blood, but remain silent over the blood of innocent refugees. The blood of the
strong one must be protected, the blood of the weak one may be shed. Why don't they try to force the British to stop bloodshed, why do they force
Why are you shouting from your walls (Hahoma Wall) about innocent Jewish blood being shed by the "terrorists," while not admitting the murder of 230
innocent refugees of the "Patria"? How dare you accuse us of murder while you killed tenfold as many Jews on a single occasion? Reply!
Jewish blood is sacred and pure. The blood of Britons suppressing foreign countries is defiled. Therefore it will be shed to prevent innocent blood
from being shed."
It does seem to be fanatical and violent, and the British were lawful governors operating under United Nations authority in an agreement the Zionists
were actually a signatory and party too. Simply put the British weren’t firing rockets at the Zionists but simply trying to get them to honor the
Mandate agreements of accepting that 52% of the land was to be awarded to the Arabs and 48% to the Zionists and Jews, with Jerusalem to remain an open
and free city overseen by the Holy See in Rome in perpetuity.