Commercial Real Estate Industry Asks Treasury for Govt. Bailout , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times
Topic started on 26-12-2008 @ 11:03 AM by semperfortis
Commercial Real Estate Industry Asks Treasury for Govt. Bailout

(CNSNews.com) - The commercial real estate industry could face massive bankruptcies in 2009 if it does not receive “urgent” loans from the federal government, according to a November letter sent to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson from the top commercial real estate trade organizations.

In the letter to Paulson, the top real estate organizations predicted that $400 billion in commercial mortgages will mature and require refinancing in 2009. A tight credit market, in which banks are wary to lend money, could prevent many owners from receiving refinancing, the letter said.

CNS News

So....

It just keeps going and going and going... We need to stop calling it just the "Bail Outs" and start calling it the "Energizer Bunny Bailouts"

When will it stop?

When will the Government stop giving our money to bailout businesses that have made bad decisions?

Being a Capitalist, and proud of it, I accept that any business decision I make is fraught with risk. If it wasn't risky, the payoff would be lower. That is just business.

Apparently the rules have changed. Now you can make stupid decisions and "Big Brother" will step in and give you the money to continue operating; and making stupid decision.

Semper


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 06:48 PM by Sestias
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Finance your war, finance your bailouts, finance, finance finance. While middle class America goes down the drain, unemployment reaches dangerous levels, and many people can't even get a loan. Squeeze some more why don't ya.


The bailout of the automakers was supposed to benefit the middle class. Not just the autoworkers who would be unemployed by the thousands, but also those in related industries from auto parts manufacturers to steelmakers, to tire manufacturers, glassmakers, plastics industries, etc.--on and on into millions of jobs.

The bailout of the banks and one insurance company was to prevent a collapse of financial institutions that could lead to a depression as bad as the one in the 1930's. Herbert Hoover, the president at the time of the stock market crash, is remembered as the guy who advocated saving and not spending. The tent cities that sprung up from the many people who lost their homes were called "Hoovervilles."

Trouble is, while Congress has demanded a huge amount of oversight from the automakers (their CEO's have agreed to work for $1 a year), they haven't exercised any over the financial institutions. CEO's are still getting millions and AIG is even paying its shareholders.

FDR's plan of putting huge amounts of money into circulation to stimulate the economy eventually worked, though it took about ten years. Many economists believe this solution will work again, but the fact is nobody can be certain of that.

What we have here is a system in which profits are private but risks are socialized. It's a win-win solution for the banks, but only a "maybe" for the rest of the country.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 06:52 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by semperfortis



Real estate is easier, it can be auctioned off.

The only way these @#%! will get a bailout is if the banks demand they get assistance since they will be unable to pay back the remanding balance.

GM had to fight for 14 billion, I pray to god Congress sends these idiots crying to their mothers for asking $400 billion of tax funds.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 07:34 PM by Cool Hand Luke
Given it is the holiday season, we can look at the present situation in terms of christmas carols. Here's one called the Twelve Days of Bailouts.



If it wasn't so depressing, I would laugh. Ah what the heck,

Edit to add:

This picture really does sum up the situation pretty well.





[edit on 26-12-2008 by Cool Hand Luke]

[edit on 26-12-2008 by Cool Hand Luke]


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 07:44 PM by Cool Hand Luke
reply to post by semperfortis



I completely agree with you. It's unbelievable the thought process of these politicians. I have long been saying that their needs to be a seperation of economy and state. Look at the good that came from seperating church and state. I say a restraining order is long overdue where government must stay 500 feet away from the economy.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 01:04 AM by pteridine
reply to post by semperfortis


All bailout loans should be adjustable rate loans that have a one year fixed interest and readjust upwards, of course, every quarter thereafter. A taste of the common man's situation may do the overpriced executives some good.
While we are at it, executive compensation for all companies getting a bailout loan should be limited by Federal salary guidelines. I would put it at about $160k/yr, max.
Further, any company that is so big that it can affect the economics of the country, is too big. Divestiture will break companies into smaller pieces that can be allowed go bankrupt while increasing competition. Banks should be divvied up into commercial, investment, and gambling casino [futures, short selling, derivatives, etc.] types with no crossflow of money.
I would turn the IRS loose on the overpaid gluttons who have collaborated with their fellow board hogs to strip the cash from companies. I would provide incentive pay to the agents for any back taxes, indictments, convictions, and jail terms.
Lastly, I would interpret the anti-terrorism law to allow unrestricted wiretapping on brokers, traders, and stock exchange employees to control financial terrorism.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 03:14 AM by xpert11
reply to post by semperfortis



Such an outrageous act has already been committed at the local government level here in Christchurch.


Christchurch City Council has come under fire for neglecting its vulnerable tenants, instead opting to spend millions of dollars by helping a cash strapped property developer.

But the mayor of Christchurch, Bob Parker, is defending his council's decision to buy five properties from cash-strapped property developer Dave Henderson.

The council revealed it has bought the properties for $17 million.

The council says the purchase was necessary but critics are calling it a public bailout for a developer in financial trouble.

"It's a bail out for an individual and I do not believe council should be getting involved in that," said Yani Johanson, a Christchurch City councillor.



Source

Although not mentioned in the article the Public Bail Out of Henderson was panned by pretty much everyone on the political spectrum . The only thing these kinds of Bail Outs can achieve is to deny legitimate investors the chance to buy up bargains and reward bad business practices and decision making as per usual .

Make no mistake while I am mild manned on ATS the Bail Outs make my blood boil because the staggering amount of money that is being spend is dooming us all to ten years of a stagnate global economy or a depression .
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^