Think the army won't turn on it's citizens?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 08:37 PM by Pfeil
reply to post by RFBurns



You just dont seem to get it do you? If people will fight over an empty parking space or empty shelf in a normal kind of day then what do you think they will do when everything comes crashing down? You also seem to have this idea that if you sit quietly in your house as army tanks and soilders lock down the USA that everything will be fine, that you will somehow be treated differently from the nut cases, you won't.

Personally, I dont like the idea of just sitting around letting the people that ran this country into the ground declare martial law and tell me how they want to rebuild it in their best interest.

So you just sit in your house and let those "in charge" tell you what to do. I would rather try to get a better America.

[edit on 27/12/08 by Pfeil]


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 09:49 PM by hvywgt250
reply to post by alyosha1981




May 4th 1970.....people seem to have forgotten what happened on that date.....Ohio national guard fired into a crowd at Kent State, killing 4 students.....



reply posted on 28-12-2008 @ 04:09 AM by DrumJunkie
reply to post by ecain



That's the big thing right there. Earlier in the thread was an active Army soldier saying they will follow lawful orders. And if the citizens were to show they were not willing to deal with the situation they will be dealt with by "his guys"

What the average U.S. citizen thinks is lawful and what an average soldier think might be two different things. If a ML situation was to happen and say the Army comes in and the big guys deicide that they need to disarm the population as happened in NO during the Katrina fiasco. I'd like to hear what the veterans and active military think of an order like that.Personally I would have a major issue with that. I might even think about resisting them when they come. What if the guys with the most fruit salad on their uniform say that those that resist giving up their weapons be arrested? Would that be a legal order?

I believe that it's things like this that the American people worry about when thinking that a ML situation might come to their doorstep. So..Soldiers both retired and active; I wish to ask what would you do in that situation?


reply posted on 30-12-2008 @ 05:37 AM by mf_luder
reply to post by DrumJunkie



I was that soldier and yes, "my guys" will follow lawful orders.

Now - in an ML situation - like I've said in other threads - you have to remember we're educated human beings such as most of you. That being said - we know the difference between right and wrong. If someone tells me that we're going to go directly against the US Constitution (the very document we all signed up and swore to uphold) by taking your 2nd amendment rights.... that # wouldn't happen.

What you forgot to mention in your post was that NO was put in the state it was because "people" were shooting at rescuers and aid workers from hidden positions and rooftops. Come on - are you serious? You fully expect either me or another soldier - not just US but ANY COUNTRY to just sit by and take that? "Oh, it's okay - it's that guy's right to shoot at me - it's his gun." Yeah. Sure. They better hope they get me with the first round, because I won't miss.

---- EDIT TO ADD ----

And yes - that does prove a point. If someone provokes me - I'm going to retaliate. Simple as that. You can call that "military brutality", "harming people" - whatever. But I serve to defend the people of the US - if those people turn on me - then that goes out the window in my mind. But that's if provoked. I don't think in a serious full scale - nation wide - martial law situation we'd be forced to give up all of our weapons. There may very well be checkpoints and stuff where you aren't allowed to bring weapons into certain areas, but I don't see a need to take civilians' weapons from their homes.

As a matter of fact, that's the main reason I don't worry about the US being invaded by another army - (well, except for San Fran). I think people in the US would be the ones out there shooting the invaders before we were ever mobilized. I could be wrong - everyone could just run away, but I think that a lot of people would stick it to em.

[edit on 30-12-2008 by mf_luder]


reply posted on 30-12-2008 @ 07:30 AM by Gorman91
reply to post by jhill76



The military IS the citizens. The second a dictator arises, the army would be the first to revolt.

You know that 20% lowest approval in decades the government has going? military is the same. Not many soldiers support the gov.


reply posted on 31-12-2008 @ 01:20 AM by DrumJunkie
reply to post by mf_luder



I'll agree NO was not a great example but we really don't have a lot to draw on.

I guess what I'm trying to get to is for the U.S. military to come in and occupy an area to instill curfews many citizens will take exception to that.I'm sure if you were a civilian and had people come in to tell you when you could leave your home and when you could not you might not like that much. Are you wrong for opting to resist such action? who is the patriot and who is the bad guy in that scenario? The American people are not used to being told what to do in that type of situation. We are used to moving freely throughout the country.

Say the place being occupied by the army doesn't believe that anything happened there to justify their rights to free movement about the country? They don't believe they need be punished with as curfew. The government says they've been bad but the locals disagree. And those occupying don't see the bad thing that the brass says transpired? What do the army people do then? By your admission all the population has to do is be aggressive. But to them they are being repressed by their own government. That's the sticky situation I'm sure a lot of people would like to believe that the soldiers would not try and repress them further. But in reality you are telling me that the reason for you coming wont matter as much as what they do once you get there. That in itself is a little unsettling.


reply posted on 3-1-2009 @ 02:00 AM by ConMi27
reply to post by mf_luder



FELLOW PEOPLE this man obviously knows what he's talking about. Pay more attention to the previous, or now, U.S. soldiers and what their saying before jumping to anymore conclusions because they know first hand how orders and people work.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



I finally solved a great mystery! I think I see now...
  Posted 19 days ago with 72 member flags
Finally! MSM Coverage - Legal Challenges to Fed - The End is Near
  Posted 18 days ago with 48 member flags
‘Barcode everyone at birth’
  Posted 4 days ago with 20 member flags
Pentagon Source Alludes to Martial Law Around July 1st, 2012
  Posted 3 days ago with 19 member flags
FBI Seize Email server, then return it
  Posted 16 days ago with 16 member flags
Bilderberg Scheme To Save The Euro
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags